On the Move to Surgery: A Scoping Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Preoperative Walking Into the Operating Theatre.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Sebastian Labenbacher,Sascha Hammer,Angelika Moser,Nikolaus Schreiber,Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti
{"title":"On the Move to Surgery: A Scoping Review of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Preoperative Walking Into the Operating Theatre.","authors":"Sebastian Labenbacher,Sascha Hammer,Angelika Moser,Nikolaus Schreiber,Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti","doi":"10.1111/jan.70264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\r\nAlthough healthcare infrastructure has improved in recent years, the preoperative journey of patients is often accompanied by anxiety. Allowing patients to walk to the operating theatre is a simple, yet underexplored strategy that may enhance their sense of autonomy and reduce anxiety. As patient-centred care gains importance, evaluating the effects of this approach on patient-reported outcomes may be more relevant than widely assumed.\r\n\r\nAIM\r\nIn this scoping review, we aim to analyse the published literature on preoperative walking into the operating theatre and patient-reported outcomes, such as anxiety and satisfaction.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nThis study was a scoping review that followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, Scoping Review extension guidelines.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nInclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing elective surgery and walking to the operating theatre. Data were extracted using a standardised form, and critical appraisal was performed by using ROBINS-I V2.0, RoB2 and ROB-E tools.\r\n\r\nDATA SOURCES\r\nEmbase, MEDLINE, Cochrane databases (OVID) and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) were searched up to 31st January 2025.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nOur search identified 958 articles, with seven trials included in the final analysis. The studies, published between 1994 and 2022, involved 3001 patients from North America, Asia and Europe. The interventions varied, but most patients reported improved satisfaction and reduced anxiety when walking to the operating theatre. No adverse events were reported, although patient preferences varied, with younger patients more likely to prefer walking.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nWalking to the theatre positively impacts patient satisfaction and autonomy. However, patient selection is key, as not all individuals are physically or mentally prepared for walking. Future research could explore unaccompanied walking and its effects on hospital resource utilisation. Preoperative walking is a beneficial intervention that enhances patient satisfaction and reduces anxiety, providing a feasible alternative to bed transport for many elective surgical patients.\r\n\r\nPATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION\r\nNo patient or public involvement.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70264","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Although healthcare infrastructure has improved in recent years, the preoperative journey of patients is often accompanied by anxiety. Allowing patients to walk to the operating theatre is a simple, yet underexplored strategy that may enhance their sense of autonomy and reduce anxiety. As patient-centred care gains importance, evaluating the effects of this approach on patient-reported outcomes may be more relevant than widely assumed. AIM In this scoping review, we aim to analyse the published literature on preoperative walking into the operating theatre and patient-reported outcomes, such as anxiety and satisfaction. DESIGN This study was a scoping review that followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses, Scoping Review extension guidelines. METHODS Inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing elective surgery and walking to the operating theatre. Data were extracted using a standardised form, and critical appraisal was performed by using ROBINS-I V2.0, RoB2 and ROB-E tools. DATA SOURCES Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane databases (OVID) and CINAHL (EBSCOhost) were searched up to 31st January 2025. RESULTS Our search identified 958 articles, with seven trials included in the final analysis. The studies, published between 1994 and 2022, involved 3001 patients from North America, Asia and Europe. The interventions varied, but most patients reported improved satisfaction and reduced anxiety when walking to the operating theatre. No adverse events were reported, although patient preferences varied, with younger patients more likely to prefer walking. CONCLUSION Walking to the theatre positively impacts patient satisfaction and autonomy. However, patient selection is key, as not all individuals are physically or mentally prepared for walking. Future research could explore unaccompanied walking and its effects on hospital resource utilisation. Preoperative walking is a beneficial intervention that enhances patient satisfaction and reduces anxiety, providing a feasible alternative to bed transport for many elective surgical patients. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION No patient or public involvement.
移动到手术:患者报告的范围回顾术前走进手术室的结果。
虽然近年来医疗基础设施有所改善,但患者的术前旅程往往伴随着焦虑。允许病人步行到手术室是一个简单的,但尚未被充分开发的策略,可以增强他们的自主意识,减少焦虑。随着以患者为中心的护理变得越来越重要,评估这种方法对患者报告结果的影响可能比普遍认为的更相关。目的:在本综述中,我们旨在分析已发表的关于术前走进手术室和患者报告的结果(如焦虑和满意度)的文献。本研究是一项范围审查,遵循乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法和系统审查和元分析的首选报告项目,范围审查扩展指南。方法入选标准为行择期手术并步行至手术室的成年患者。使用标准化表格提取数据,并使用ROBINS-I V2.0、RoB2和robs - e工具进行关键评估。检索截止到2025年1月31日的embase、MEDLINE、Cochrane数据库(OVID)和CINAHL数据库(EBSCOhost)。结果我们检索了958篇文献,最终分析了7项试验。这些研究发表于1994年至2022年间,涉及来自北美、亚洲和欧洲的3001名患者。干预措施各不相同,但大多数患者报告说,当走到手术室时,满意度提高了,焦虑减少了。没有不良事件的报道,尽管患者的偏好各不相同,年轻患者更倾向于步行。结论步行到手术室对患者满意度和自主性有积极影响。然而,病人的选择是关键,因为不是所有的人在身体上或精神上都为行走做好了准备。未来的研究可以探讨无人陪伴行走及其对医院资源利用的影响。术前行走是一种有益的干预,可以提高患者满意度,减少焦虑,为许多选择性手术患者提供了一种可行的替代床运输。患者或公众贡献:无患者或公众参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信