Emotions in Nursing Care Prioritisation Decisions: A Critical Incident Debriefing Study of Missed Nursing Care.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Mirit Cohen,Yosur Massalha,Anat Drach-Zahavy,Einav Srulovici
{"title":"Emotions in Nursing Care Prioritisation Decisions: A Critical Incident Debriefing Study of Missed Nursing Care.","authors":"Mirit Cohen,Yosur Massalha,Anat Drach-Zahavy,Einav Srulovici","doi":"10.1111/jan.70239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\r\nTo examine the decision-making processes underlying missed nursing care.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nA qualitative study using Critical Incident Debriefing interviews.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nFifteen nurses from inpatient wards in a general hospital participated in semi-structured interviews following their morning shifts. Interviews focused on care prioritisation incidents leading to missed nursing care. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAnalysis revealed a central theme of emotions as crucial determinants in care prioritisation decisions. Two subthemes emerged: emotions as drivers of care prioritisation decisions and emotions as responses to these decisions. Positive emotions motivated nurses to prioritise care for specific patients, while negative emotions sometimes led to care delays. Successful care completion generated professional satisfaction, while care omissions produced complex emotional responses, including guilt, frustration and helplessness.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe dual emotional processes identified in this study-emotions functioning as both drivers and responses in care decisions-challenge purely structural explanations of missed nursing care. This perspective reframes nurses as emotionally engaged decision-makers who actively navigate care priorities rather than passively react to contextual constraints, offering a more comprehensive framework for understanding the complexity of clinical judgement in real-world settings.\r\n\r\nIMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE\r\nThis study positions emotions as legitimate components of clinical decision-making rather than cognitive biases. For nursing practice, this necessitates integrating emotional awareness into professional development. For patient care, recognising emotional underpinnings may promote equitable care distribution through interventions that engage with the emotional realities of nursing work.\r\n\r\nIMPACT\r\nThis study addressed limited understanding of decision-making in missed nursing care, particularly emotions' role. Findings reveal how emotions influence nurses' prioritisation decisions and wellbeing, with implications for nurses, educators and administrators seeking interventions addressing structural and emotional dimensions.\r\n\r\nREPORTING METHOD\r\nThis study adhered to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) guidelines (Appendix S1).\r\n\r\nPATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION\r\nNo patient or public contribution.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70239","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AIM To examine the decision-making processes underlying missed nursing care. DESIGN A qualitative study using Critical Incident Debriefing interviews. METHODS Fifteen nurses from inpatient wards in a general hospital participated in semi-structured interviews following their morning shifts. Interviews focused on care prioritisation incidents leading to missed nursing care. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS Analysis revealed a central theme of emotions as crucial determinants in care prioritisation decisions. Two subthemes emerged: emotions as drivers of care prioritisation decisions and emotions as responses to these decisions. Positive emotions motivated nurses to prioritise care for specific patients, while negative emotions sometimes led to care delays. Successful care completion generated professional satisfaction, while care omissions produced complex emotional responses, including guilt, frustration and helplessness. CONCLUSION The dual emotional processes identified in this study-emotions functioning as both drivers and responses in care decisions-challenge purely structural explanations of missed nursing care. This perspective reframes nurses as emotionally engaged decision-makers who actively navigate care priorities rather than passively react to contextual constraints, offering a more comprehensive framework for understanding the complexity of clinical judgement in real-world settings. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE This study positions emotions as legitimate components of clinical decision-making rather than cognitive biases. For nursing practice, this necessitates integrating emotional awareness into professional development. For patient care, recognising emotional underpinnings may promote equitable care distribution through interventions that engage with the emotional realities of nursing work. IMPACT This study addressed limited understanding of decision-making in missed nursing care, particularly emotions' role. Findings reveal how emotions influence nurses' prioritisation decisions and wellbeing, with implications for nurses, educators and administrators seeking interventions addressing structural and emotional dimensions. REPORTING METHOD This study adhered to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) guidelines (Appendix S1). PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION No patient or public contribution.
护理优先级决策中的情绪:对错过护理的关键事件述评研究。
目的:探讨忽视护理的决策过程。设计一个使用关键事件汇报访谈的定性研究。方法某综合医院住院病房的15名护士参加了早轮班后的半结构化访谈。访谈的重点是护理优先事件导致错过护理。采用专题分析对数据进行分析。结果分析揭示了情绪作为护理优先级决策的关键决定因素的中心主题。出现了两个副主题:情绪作为护理优先级决定的驱动因素,以及情绪作为对这些决定的反应。积极情绪会促使护士优先照顾特定的病人,而消极情绪有时会导致护理延误。成功的护理完成产生了职业满意度,而忽视护理则产生了复杂的情绪反应,包括内疚、沮丧和无助。结论本研究发现的双重情绪过程——情绪在护理决策中既起驱动作用又起反应作用——挑战了对错过护理的纯粹结构性解释。这一观点将护士重新定义为情感参与的决策者,他们积极引导护理优先事项,而不是被动地对环境约束作出反应,为理解现实世界中临床判断的复杂性提供了更全面的框架。本研究将情绪定位为临床决策的合理组成部分,而不是认知偏见。对于护理实践来说,这需要将情感意识融入到专业发展中。对于病人护理来说,认识到情感基础可以通过干预护理工作中的情感现实来促进公平的护理分配。影响:本研究解决了对错过护理中决策的有限理解,特别是情绪的作用。研究结果揭示了情绪如何影响护士的优先级决定和福祉,对护士、教育工作者和管理人员寻求解决结构和情感层面的干预措施具有启示意义。报告方法本研究遵循定性研究报告标准(SRQR)指南(附录S1)。病人或公众捐款:没有病人或公众捐款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.90%
发文量
369
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy. All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信