{"title":"Emotions in Nursing Care Prioritisation Decisions: A Critical Incident Debriefing Study of Missed Nursing Care.","authors":"Mirit Cohen,Yosur Massalha,Anat Drach-Zahavy,Einav Srulovici","doi":"10.1111/jan.70239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\r\nTo examine the decision-making processes underlying missed nursing care.\r\n\r\nDESIGN\r\nA qualitative study using Critical Incident Debriefing interviews.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nFifteen nurses from inpatient wards in a general hospital participated in semi-structured interviews following their morning shifts. Interviews focused on care prioritisation incidents leading to missed nursing care. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nAnalysis revealed a central theme of emotions as crucial determinants in care prioritisation decisions. Two subthemes emerged: emotions as drivers of care prioritisation decisions and emotions as responses to these decisions. Positive emotions motivated nurses to prioritise care for specific patients, while negative emotions sometimes led to care delays. Successful care completion generated professional satisfaction, while care omissions produced complex emotional responses, including guilt, frustration and helplessness.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe dual emotional processes identified in this study-emotions functioning as both drivers and responses in care decisions-challenge purely structural explanations of missed nursing care. This perspective reframes nurses as emotionally engaged decision-makers who actively navigate care priorities rather than passively react to contextual constraints, offering a more comprehensive framework for understanding the complexity of clinical judgement in real-world settings.\r\n\r\nIMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE\r\nThis study positions emotions as legitimate components of clinical decision-making rather than cognitive biases. For nursing practice, this necessitates integrating emotional awareness into professional development. For patient care, recognising emotional underpinnings may promote equitable care distribution through interventions that engage with the emotional realities of nursing work.\r\n\r\nIMPACT\r\nThis study addressed limited understanding of decision-making in missed nursing care, particularly emotions' role. Findings reveal how emotions influence nurses' prioritisation decisions and wellbeing, with implications for nurses, educators and administrators seeking interventions addressing structural and emotional dimensions.\r\n\r\nREPORTING METHOD\r\nThis study adhered to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) guidelines (Appendix S1).\r\n\r\nPATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION\r\nNo patient or public contribution.","PeriodicalId":54897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70239","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AIM
To examine the decision-making processes underlying missed nursing care.
DESIGN
A qualitative study using Critical Incident Debriefing interviews.
METHODS
Fifteen nurses from inpatient wards in a general hospital participated in semi-structured interviews following their morning shifts. Interviews focused on care prioritisation incidents leading to missed nursing care. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.
RESULTS
Analysis revealed a central theme of emotions as crucial determinants in care prioritisation decisions. Two subthemes emerged: emotions as drivers of care prioritisation decisions and emotions as responses to these decisions. Positive emotions motivated nurses to prioritise care for specific patients, while negative emotions sometimes led to care delays. Successful care completion generated professional satisfaction, while care omissions produced complex emotional responses, including guilt, frustration and helplessness.
CONCLUSION
The dual emotional processes identified in this study-emotions functioning as both drivers and responses in care decisions-challenge purely structural explanations of missed nursing care. This perspective reframes nurses as emotionally engaged decision-makers who actively navigate care priorities rather than passively react to contextual constraints, offering a more comprehensive framework for understanding the complexity of clinical judgement in real-world settings.
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE
This study positions emotions as legitimate components of clinical decision-making rather than cognitive biases. For nursing practice, this necessitates integrating emotional awareness into professional development. For patient care, recognising emotional underpinnings may promote equitable care distribution through interventions that engage with the emotional realities of nursing work.
IMPACT
This study addressed limited understanding of decision-making in missed nursing care, particularly emotions' role. Findings reveal how emotions influence nurses' prioritisation decisions and wellbeing, with implications for nurses, educators and administrators seeking interventions addressing structural and emotional dimensions.
REPORTING METHOD
This study adhered to the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) guidelines (Appendix S1).
PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION
No patient or public contribution.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Advanced Nursing (JAN) contributes to the advancement of evidence-based nursing, midwifery and healthcare by disseminating high quality research and scholarship of contemporary relevance and with potential to advance knowledge for practice, education, management or policy.
All JAN papers are required to have a sound scientific, evidential, theoretical or philosophical base and to be critical, questioning and scholarly in approach. As an international journal, JAN promotes diversity of research and scholarship in terms of culture, paradigm and healthcare context. For JAN’s worldwide readership, authors are expected to make clear the wider international relevance of their work and to demonstrate sensitivity to cultural considerations and differences.