Recovery bone formation over radiographic lingual bone dehiscence after mandibular molar distalization with microimplants.

IF 3.2
Ho-Jin Kim, Hyung-Kyu Noh, Hyo-Sang Park
{"title":"Recovery bone formation over radiographic lingual bone dehiscence after mandibular molar distalization with microimplants.","authors":"Ho-Jin Kim, Hyung-Kyu Noh, Hyo-Sang Park","doi":"10.2319/011625-58.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess mandibular lingual bone thickness changes after molar distalization with microimplants and during retention.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty-one patients (10 men, 11 women; mean age: 20.5 ± 4.9 years) who underwent mandibular molar distalization with microimplants were included. Cone-beam computed tomography images at pretreatment (T0), posttreatment (T1), and retention (T2) were used to measure posterior space available and lingual bone thickness distal to the mandibular second molar at 0-, 2-, 4-, and 6-mm levels apical to the root furcation. Repeated measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction was applied to compare T0, T1, and T2 measurements. Pearson's correlation analysis assessed the relationship between lingual bone thickness change and other variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mandibular second molar moved distally by 3.0 mm at crown level, and 1.2-1.8 mm at root level, after treatment. Posterior space available decreased significantly with root-cortex contact or radiographic lingual bone dehiscence observed at 6-mm root level. After retention, reduced cortical bone thickness increased significantly; however, T2 lingual bone thickness was less than T0. Although the decrease in lingual bone thickness at 6-mm root level correlated with crown and root distal movement after treatment, the increase in bone thickness during retention was not associated with tooth movement, patient age, or retention duration.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mandibular lingual bone thickness noticeably decreased after molar distalization with microimplants. After retention, significant bone recovery formation was observed at the thinned lingual cortex or radiographic bone dehiscence.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/011625-58.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess mandibular lingual bone thickness changes after molar distalization with microimplants and during retention.

Materials and methods: Twenty-one patients (10 men, 11 women; mean age: 20.5 ± 4.9 years) who underwent mandibular molar distalization with microimplants were included. Cone-beam computed tomography images at pretreatment (T0), posttreatment (T1), and retention (T2) were used to measure posterior space available and lingual bone thickness distal to the mandibular second molar at 0-, 2-, 4-, and 6-mm levels apical to the root furcation. Repeated measures analysis of variance with Bonferroni correction was applied to compare T0, T1, and T2 measurements. Pearson's correlation analysis assessed the relationship between lingual bone thickness change and other variables.

Results: The mandibular second molar moved distally by 3.0 mm at crown level, and 1.2-1.8 mm at root level, after treatment. Posterior space available decreased significantly with root-cortex contact or radiographic lingual bone dehiscence observed at 6-mm root level. After retention, reduced cortical bone thickness increased significantly; however, T2 lingual bone thickness was less than T0. Although the decrease in lingual bone thickness at 6-mm root level correlated with crown and root distal movement after treatment, the increase in bone thickness during retention was not associated with tooth movement, patient age, or retention duration.

Conclusions: Mandibular lingual bone thickness noticeably decreased after molar distalization with microimplants. After retention, significant bone recovery formation was observed at the thinned lingual cortex or radiographic bone dehiscence.

下颌磨牙微种植体远端化后舌骨裂的影像学恢复骨形成。
目的:评估下颌舌骨厚度在微种植体离体后和保留期间的变化。材料与方法:采用微种植体行下颌磨牙远端化的患者21例(男10例,女11例,平均年龄20.5±4.9岁)。使用预处理(T0)、处理后(T1)和保留(T2)时的锥束计算机断层扫描图像测量下颌第二磨牙远端0、2、4和6毫米水平的可用后牙空间和舌骨厚度,从根尖到根分叉。采用Bonferroni校正的重复测量方差分析比较T0、T1和T2测量值。Pearson相关分析评估舌骨厚度变化与其他变量之间的关系。结果:治疗后下颌第二磨牙在牙冠水平移动3.0 mm,在牙根水平移动1.2 ~ 1.8 mm。当根与皮质接触或舌骨x线片在6毫米根水平处出现开裂时,可用的后牙空间明显减少。保留后,减少的皮质骨厚度显著增加;T2舌骨厚度小于T0。虽然6毫米牙根水平舌骨厚度的减少与治疗后冠和根的远端运动有关,但固位期间骨厚度的增加与牙齿运动、患者年龄或固位时间无关。结论:采用微种植体进行磨牙远端化后,下颌舌骨厚度明显降低。保留后,在变薄的舌皮质或x线骨裂处观察到明显的骨恢复形成。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信