Influence of social media on the choice of orthodontist and different types of orthodontic treatment.

IF 3.2
Amanda Rafaela Diniz, Dauro Douglas Oliveira, Lucas Guimarães Abreu, Ribeiro de Castro Ribeiro, Soraya de Mattos Camargo Grossmann
{"title":"Influence of social media on the choice of orthodontist and different types of orthodontic treatment.","authors":"Amanda Rafaela Diniz, Dauro Douglas Oliveira, Lucas Guimarães Abreu, Ribeiro de Castro Ribeiro, Soraya de Mattos Camargo Grossmann","doi":"10.2319/090424-727.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate, from the perspective of patients, the influence of social media (SM) on the choice of orthodontist and the acceptance of orthodontic treatment (OT) proposed by a professional.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire that contained 17 items distributed across four sections. Individuals older than 18 years, who were treated or sought OT, and who had SM accounts were included. Data were collected via Google Forms using the snowball technique and subsequently analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Effect size (ES) was calculated (small, moderate, or large).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 206 participants, 148 were women (71.8%), and 58 were men (28.2%), with a mean age of 37.3 ± 15.0 years. The most used SM applications were WhatsApp (95.1%), Instagram (92.2%), YouTube (56.8%), and Facebook (30.1%). Women respondents 36 years old or younger who were single and had no higher education showed a significant difference in choosing a professional and accepting OT on all questionnaire items (P < 0.001). Among SM platforms, Instagram was the one used most often to choose a professional and OT modality as well as considered important for revealing the professional's academic training. By contrast, WhatsApp was the least used for before-and-after posts, while YouTube was seldom used to evaluate posted comments. For variables with significant differences, the ES ranged from moderate to large.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SM, especially Instagram, can influence decision-making when choosing an orthodontist and accepting the recommendations for OT proposed by a professional.</p>","PeriodicalId":94224,"journal":{"name":"The Angle orthodontist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Angle orthodontist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2319/090424-727.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate, from the perspective of patients, the influence of social media (SM) on the choice of orthodontist and the acceptance of orthodontic treatment (OT) proposed by a professional.

Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire that contained 17 items distributed across four sections. Individuals older than 18 years, who were treated or sought OT, and who had SM accounts were included. Data were collected via Google Forms using the snowball technique and subsequently analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U-test. Effect size (ES) was calculated (small, moderate, or large).

Results: Of the 206 participants, 148 were women (71.8%), and 58 were men (28.2%), with a mean age of 37.3 ± 15.0 years. The most used SM applications were WhatsApp (95.1%), Instagram (92.2%), YouTube (56.8%), and Facebook (30.1%). Women respondents 36 years old or younger who were single and had no higher education showed a significant difference in choosing a professional and accepting OT on all questionnaire items (P < 0.001). Among SM platforms, Instagram was the one used most often to choose a professional and OT modality as well as considered important for revealing the professional's academic training. By contrast, WhatsApp was the least used for before-and-after posts, while YouTube was seldom used to evaluate posted comments. For variables with significant differences, the ES ranged from moderate to large.

Conclusions: SM, especially Instagram, can influence decision-making when choosing an orthodontist and accepting the recommendations for OT proposed by a professional.

社交媒体对正畸医生选择和不同类型正畸治疗的影响。
目的:从患者的角度,评估社交媒体(SM)对正畸医生选择和专业人员提出的正畸治疗(OT)接受度的影响。材料和方法:本横断面研究采用在线问卷进行,问卷包含17个项目,分布在四个部分。年龄在18岁以上,接受过治疗或寻求过OT,并且有SM账户的人也包括在内。使用滚雪球技术通过谷歌表格收集数据,随后使用Mann-Whitney u检验进行分析。计算效应量(ES)(小、中、大)。结果:206例患者中,女性148例(71.8%),男性58例(28.2%),平均年龄37.3±15.0岁。使用最多的短信应用是WhatsApp(95.1%)、Instagram(92.2%)、YouTube(56.8%)和Facebook(30.1%)。36岁及以下未受高等教育的单身女性受访者在选择专业和接受OT方面在所有问卷项目上都有显著差异(P < 0.001)。在SM平台中,Instagram是最常用于选择专业和OT模式的平台,并且被认为是揭示专业人员学术培训的重要平台。相比之下,WhatsApp用于前后对比的帖子最少,而YouTube很少用于评估发布的评论。对于差异显著的变量,ES的范围从中等到较大。结论:在选择正畸医生和接受专业人员建议的OT时,SM尤其是Instagram会影响决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信