Posterior Labral Repair With Capsular Plication Shows Enduring Mid-Term Outcomes and Return to Sports With Low Recurrence Rates.

IF 5.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Ignacio Pasqualini, Oguz Turan, Catalina Larrague, Ignacio Tanoira, Maximiliano Ranalletta, Luciano Rossi
{"title":"Posterior Labral Repair With Capsular Plication Shows Enduring Mid-Term Outcomes and Return to Sports With Low Recurrence Rates.","authors":"Ignacio Pasqualini, Oguz Turan, Catalina Larrague, Ignacio Tanoira, Maximiliano Ranalletta, Luciano Rossi","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate mid-term (>5-year) clinical outcomes, recurrence rates, and return to sports in a cohort of patients undergoing arthroscopic posterior labral repair and capsular plication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent isolated posterior labral repairs with capsular plication for posterior shoulder instability with a minimum follow-up period of 8 years. We included patients who (1) underwent arthroscopic posterior labral repair and capsular plication as the index procedure, (2) had minimum 8-year follow-up, (3) were older than 18 years at the time of final follow-up, and (4) had complete patient-reported outcome measures at final follow-up. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Rowe score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score at baseline, 1-year follow-up, and final follow-up. Recurrence rates, complications, and return to sports were also evaluated. The proportions of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) were calculated for each outcome measure using established thresholds.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age at surgery of 20.7 ± 4.1 years, and 87.2% were male patients. At a mean final follow-up of 10.2 years (range, 8.0-13.6 years), the mean Rowe, ASES, and SANE scores were 89.5 ± 13.0, 87.8 ± 12.8, and 83.8 ± 7.7, respectively, showing significant improvements from baseline. The MCID was achieved by 97.9% of patients for the Rowe score, 100% for the ASES score, and 85.1% for the SANE score. The PASS was achieved by 66% of patients for the Rowe score, 83% for the ASES score, and 68% for the SANE score. Three patients (6.4%) experienced recurrent instability, with a mean time to recurrence of 21.3 ± 1.5 months. Two patients underwent revision surgery. Most patients (91.5%) returned to sports, at an average time of 5.4 ± 1.0 months after surgery, with 78.7% returning at the same level as before the injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Arthroscopic repair for posterior shoulder instability yields favorable mid-term outcomes, with significant improvements in functional scores and a low recurrence rate at a mean follow-up of 10.6 years. A high proportion of patients achieved the MCID and PASS for all outcome measures, indicating clinically meaningful improvements in shoulder function and patient satisfaction. Most patients successfully returned to sports, with nearly 80% returning at their preinjury level. These findings support the durability and effectiveness of arthroscopic repair in managing posterior shoulder instability, helping patients maintain a high level of shoulder function and sports participation over an extended period.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, retrospective case series.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2025.07.040","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate mid-term (>5-year) clinical outcomes, recurrence rates, and return to sports in a cohort of patients undergoing arthroscopic posterior labral repair and capsular plication.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who underwent isolated posterior labral repairs with capsular plication for posterior shoulder instability with a minimum follow-up period of 8 years. We included patients who (1) underwent arthroscopic posterior labral repair and capsular plication as the index procedure, (2) had minimum 8-year follow-up, (3) were older than 18 years at the time of final follow-up, and (4) had complete patient-reported outcome measures at final follow-up. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Rowe score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score at baseline, 1-year follow-up, and final follow-up. Recurrence rates, complications, and return to sports were also evaluated. The proportions of patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) were calculated for each outcome measure using established thresholds.

Results: Forty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria, with a mean age at surgery of 20.7 ± 4.1 years, and 87.2% were male patients. At a mean final follow-up of 10.2 years (range, 8.0-13.6 years), the mean Rowe, ASES, and SANE scores were 89.5 ± 13.0, 87.8 ± 12.8, and 83.8 ± 7.7, respectively, showing significant improvements from baseline. The MCID was achieved by 97.9% of patients for the Rowe score, 100% for the ASES score, and 85.1% for the SANE score. The PASS was achieved by 66% of patients for the Rowe score, 83% for the ASES score, and 68% for the SANE score. Three patients (6.4%) experienced recurrent instability, with a mean time to recurrence of 21.3 ± 1.5 months. Two patients underwent revision surgery. Most patients (91.5%) returned to sports, at an average time of 5.4 ± 1.0 months after surgery, with 78.7% returning at the same level as before the injury.

Conclusions: Arthroscopic repair for posterior shoulder instability yields favorable mid-term outcomes, with significant improvements in functional scores and a low recurrence rate at a mean follow-up of 10.6 years. A high proportion of patients achieved the MCID and PASS for all outcome measures, indicating clinically meaningful improvements in shoulder function and patient satisfaction. Most patients successfully returned to sports, with nearly 80% returning at their preinjury level. These findings support the durability and effectiveness of arthroscopic repair in managing posterior shoulder instability, helping patients maintain a high level of shoulder function and sports participation over an extended period.

Level of evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

后唇包膜修补术显示持久的中期疗效和恢复运动,复发率低。
目的:本研究旨在评估一组接受关节镜下后唇修复和囊膜应用的患者的中期(5年)临床结果、复发率和重返运动。方法:回顾性分析对后肩部不稳定的患者进行了至少8年的随访,并进行了孤立的后唇修补术。我们纳入了以下患者:1)接受关节镜下后唇修复和囊膜应用作为指标手术,(2)至少进行了8年的随访,(3)在最后随访时年龄为bb0 - 18岁,(4)在最后随访时有完整的PROMs。临床结果采用Rowe评分、美国肩关节外科医生(ASES)评分和单一评估数值评估(SANE)在基线、1年和最终随访时进行评估。复发率,并发症和恢复运动也进行了评估。使用既定阈值计算每个结果测量中达到最小临床重要差异(MCID)和患者可接受症状状态(PASS)的患者比例。结果:47例患者符合纳入标准,平均手术年龄20.7±4.1岁,男性占87.2%。在平均10.2年(范围8.0至13.6年)的最终随访中,Rowe、ASES和SANE的平均评分分别为89.5±13.0、87.8±12.8和83.8±7.7,与基线相比有显著改善。Rowe评分97.9%的患者达到了MCID, ASES评分为100%,SANE评分为85.1%。66%的Rowe评分达到PASS, 83%的ASES评分达到PASS, 68%的SANE评分达到PASS。3例(6.4%)出现复发性不稳定,平均复发时间为21.3±1.5个月。2例患者接受了翻修手术。大多数患者(91.5%)在术后平均5.4±1.0个月恢复运动,其中78.7%恢复到伤前水平。结论:关节镜修复后肩不稳定的中期预后良好,功能评分显著改善,平均随访10.6年复发率低。很高比例的患者达到了所有结果测量的MCID和PASS,表明肩部功能和患者满意度有临床意义的改善。大多数患者成功地恢复了运动,近80%的患者恢复到受伤前的水平。这些发现支持了关节镜修复在处理肩部后部不稳定方面的耐久性和有效性,帮助患者在较长时间内保持高水平的肩部功能和运动参与。证据级别:IV -回顾性病例系列。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信