Nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin for previously untreated unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: an Asian subgroup analysis from the global phase 3 CheckMate 901 trial.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Yoshihiko Tomita, Ding-Wei Ye, Akifumi Fujii, Naohiro Takeuchi
{"title":"Nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin for previously untreated unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma: an Asian subgroup analysis from the global phase 3 CheckMate 901 trial.","authors":"Yoshihiko Tomita, Ding-Wei Ye, Akifumi Fujii, Naohiro Takeuchi","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the global phase 3 CheckMate 901 trial, nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin demonstrated significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, clinical benefit for patients from Asian countries remains unclear. Here, we analyzed outcomes in the Asian population from CheckMate 901.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with unresectable or metastatic UC were randomized to receive nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin or gemcitabine-cisplatin alone. Efficacy including OS and PFS and safety were evaluated in the Asian population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 133 patients (72 received nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin, and 61 received gemcitabine-cisplatin alone) were enrolled from China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore between January 2018 and September 2022. The median follow-up was 27.2 months. OS and PFS favored nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin over gemcitabine-cisplatin alone (median OS, 24.0 vs. 18.9 months; median PFS, 9.5 vs. 7.2 months) with hazard ratios of 0.69 for OS and 0.53 for PFS. Similar trends towards favorable OS and PFS was found in subgroups with tumor PD-L1 expression ≥1%, and regardless of tumor origin (bladder cancer or upper tract UC). The incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events was 63.9% with nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin and 61.4% with gemcitabine-cisplatin alone.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin showed a trend towards improved OS and PFS outcomes in the Asian population, suggesting that the combination therapy may serve as a new treatment option for patients from Asian countries who have unresectable or metastatic UC.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03036098.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the global phase 3 CheckMate 901 trial, nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin demonstrated significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC). However, clinical benefit for patients from Asian countries remains unclear. Here, we analyzed outcomes in the Asian population from CheckMate 901.

Methods: Patients with unresectable or metastatic UC were randomized to receive nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin or gemcitabine-cisplatin alone. Efficacy including OS and PFS and safety were evaluated in the Asian population.

Results: A total of 133 patients (72 received nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin, and 61 received gemcitabine-cisplatin alone) were enrolled from China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, and Singapore between January 2018 and September 2022. The median follow-up was 27.2 months. OS and PFS favored nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin over gemcitabine-cisplatin alone (median OS, 24.0 vs. 18.9 months; median PFS, 9.5 vs. 7.2 months) with hazard ratios of 0.69 for OS and 0.53 for PFS. Similar trends towards favorable OS and PFS was found in subgroups with tumor PD-L1 expression ≥1%, and regardless of tumor origin (bladder cancer or upper tract UC). The incidence of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events was 63.9% with nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin and 61.4% with gemcitabine-cisplatin alone.

Conclusions: Nivolumab plus gemcitabine-cisplatin showed a trend towards improved OS and PFS outcomes in the Asian population, suggesting that the combination therapy may serve as a new treatment option for patients from Asian countries who have unresectable or metastatic UC.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03036098.

Nivolumab联合吉西他滨-顺铂治疗先前未治疗的不可切除或转移性尿路上皮癌:来自全球3期CheckMate 901试验的亚洲亚组分析
背景:在全球3期CheckMate 901试验中,nivolumab联合吉西他滨-顺铂显示出对不可切除或转移性尿路上皮癌(UC)的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)的显著改善。然而,亚洲国家患者的临床获益尚不清楚。在这里,我们分析了来自CheckMate 901的亚洲人群的结果。方法:不可切除或转移性UC患者随机接受纳武单抗联合吉西他滨-顺铂或吉西他滨-顺铂单独治疗。在亚洲人群中评估了包括OS和PFS在内的疗效和安全性。结果:2018年1月至2022年9月,来自中国、日本、韩国、台湾和新加坡的133例患者(72例接受纳武单抗联合吉西他滨-顺铂治疗,61例单独接受吉西他滨-顺铂治疗)入组。中位随访时间为27.2个月。OS和PFS更倾向于纳武单抗联合吉西他滨-顺铂而不是单独吉西他滨-顺铂(中位生存期,24.0 vs. 18.9个月;中位生存期,9.5 vs. 7.2个月),OS和PFS的风险比分别为0.69和0.53。在肿瘤PD-L1表达≥1%的亚组中,无论肿瘤来源(膀胱癌或上尿路UC), OS和PFS都有类似的有利趋势。≥3级治疗相关不良事件发生率纳武单抗联合吉西他滨-顺铂组为63.9%,单吉西他滨-顺铂组为61.4%。结论:尼沃单抗联合吉西他滨-顺铂在亚洲人群中显示出改善OS和PFS结果的趋势,表明联合治疗可能作为亚洲国家不可切除或转移性UC患者的新治疗选择。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03036098。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信