Accuracy of Nutrition-Related Awareness Messages on Twitter (Rebranded as X) by the Nutrition Awareness Providers in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Validity Content Analysis.

IF 1.1
Duaa Alammari, Iman A Bindayel, Noura Althukair, Noura AlRomi, Khalid Aldubayan, Najla Khateeb, Ahmed Alabdrabalnabi, Banan Banamah
{"title":"Accuracy of Nutrition-Related Awareness Messages on Twitter (Rebranded as X) by the Nutrition Awareness Providers in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Validity Content Analysis.","authors":"Duaa Alammari, Iman A Bindayel, Noura Althukair, Noura AlRomi, Khalid Aldubayan, Najla Khateeb, Ahmed Alabdrabalnabi, Banan Banamah","doi":"10.2196/68128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the increasing use of social media, platforms like Twitter (rebranded as X in 2023) have become popular channels for disseminating health information. In Saudi Arabia, Twitter is widely used, making it an effective tool for health awareness. However, the accuracy of nutrition-related content on social media is often questioned.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to evaluate the accuracy and evidence-based quality of nutrition-related tweets posted by reputable Saudi health and nutrition awareness providers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A mixed methods content analysis was conducted on tweets published by 7 Saudi health organizations, examining content in Arabic and English over 12 months. Nutrition-related tweets were analyzed for accuracy, popularity, and evidence inclusion by a panel of experts in clinical nutrition, food science, and technology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 531 nutrition-related tweets were included in the study. Findings indicate that 445 (84%) of the tweets were accurate, of which only 17 (4%) included cited evidence. Yet, only 13 (2%) were inaccurate. The highest number of tweets are from Saudi Food and Drug Administration (SFDA) 96 (18%), Gulf Health Council (GHC) 91 (17%), Saudi Society for Clinical Nutrition (SSCN) 89 (16%), Kayl Association for Combating Obesity 83 (16%) and National Nutrition Committee (NNC) 80 (15%) and the lowest is Ministry of Health (MOH) 31 (5%). Significant relationships were observed between tweet accuracy and the source organization (P=.009, 95% CI 0.008-0.01), content type (P=.03, 95% CI 0.03-0.03), and tweet timing (P=.04, 95% CI 0.04-0.04). Governmental sources had higher popularity and were more frequently accurate compared to nongovernmental sources.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Reputable Twitter accounts in Saudi Arabia generally provide accurate nutrition-related content, though evidence citation is minimal. Users are encouraged to rely on reputable accounts for health information, and further research is suggested to explore the quality of evidence in such posts.</p>","PeriodicalId":74345,"journal":{"name":"Online journal of public health informatics","volume":"17 ","pages":"e68128"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12468160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Online journal of public health informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/68128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the increasing use of social media, platforms like Twitter (rebranded as X in 2023) have become popular channels for disseminating health information. In Saudi Arabia, Twitter is widely used, making it an effective tool for health awareness. However, the accuracy of nutrition-related content on social media is often questioned.

Objective: The study aims to evaluate the accuracy and evidence-based quality of nutrition-related tweets posted by reputable Saudi health and nutrition awareness providers.

Methods: A mixed methods content analysis was conducted on tweets published by 7 Saudi health organizations, examining content in Arabic and English over 12 months. Nutrition-related tweets were analyzed for accuracy, popularity, and evidence inclusion by a panel of experts in clinical nutrition, food science, and technology.

Results: A total of 531 nutrition-related tweets were included in the study. Findings indicate that 445 (84%) of the tweets were accurate, of which only 17 (4%) included cited evidence. Yet, only 13 (2%) were inaccurate. The highest number of tweets are from Saudi Food and Drug Administration (SFDA) 96 (18%), Gulf Health Council (GHC) 91 (17%), Saudi Society for Clinical Nutrition (SSCN) 89 (16%), Kayl Association for Combating Obesity 83 (16%) and National Nutrition Committee (NNC) 80 (15%) and the lowest is Ministry of Health (MOH) 31 (5%). Significant relationships were observed between tweet accuracy and the source organization (P=.009, 95% CI 0.008-0.01), content type (P=.03, 95% CI 0.03-0.03), and tweet timing (P=.04, 95% CI 0.04-0.04). Governmental sources had higher popularity and were more frequently accurate compared to nongovernmental sources.

Conclusions: Reputable Twitter accounts in Saudi Arabia generally provide accurate nutrition-related content, though evidence citation is minimal. Users are encouraged to rely on reputable accounts for health information, and further research is suggested to explore the quality of evidence in such posts.

沙特阿拉伯王国营养意识提供者在Twitter(更名为X)上的营养相关意识信息的准确性:有效性内容分析。
背景:随着社交媒体的使用越来越多,像Twitter(在2023年更名为X)这样的平台已经成为传播健康信息的流行渠道。在沙特阿拉伯,Twitter被广泛使用,使其成为提高健康意识的有效工具。然而,社交媒体上与营养有关的内容的准确性经常受到质疑。目的:本研究旨在评估沙特知名健康和营养意识提供者发布的营养相关推文的准确性和循证质量。方法:对7个沙特卫生组织发布的推文进行混合方法内容分析,检查12个月内的阿拉伯语和英语内容。临床营养、食品科学和技术专家小组对营养相关推文的准确性、受欢迎程度和证据纳入进行了分析。结果:共有531条与营养相关的推文被纳入研究。调查结果表明,445条(84%)推文是准确的,其中只有17条(4%)包含引用的证据。然而,只有13个(2%)是不准确的。推特数量最多的是沙特食品和药物管理局(SFDA) 96条(18%),海湾卫生委员会(GHC) 91条(17%),沙特临床营养学会(SSCN) 89条(16%),Kayl抗肥胖协会83条(16%)和国家营养委员会(NNC) 80条(15%),最低的是卫生部(MOH) 31条(5%)。推文准确性与来源组织(P= 0.009, 95% CI 0.008-0.01)、内容类型(P= 0.03, 95% CI 0.03-0.03)和推文时间(P= 0.04, 95% CI 0.04-0.04)之间存在显著关系。与非政府来源相比,政府来源更受欢迎,也更准确。结论:沙特阿拉伯信誉良好的Twitter账户通常提供准确的营养相关内容,尽管证据引用很少。鼓励用户依靠信誉良好的帐户获取健康信息,并建议进一步研究以探索此类帖子中证据的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信