First toxicity profile of aminoindane-based new psychoactive substances: 2-aminoindane (2-AI, CAS: 2975-41-9) and N-Methyl-2-aminoindane (NM-2-AI, CAS: 24445–44–1) – comprehensive prediction of toxicological endpoints important from clinical and forensic perspective using in silico multi- approach
{"title":"First toxicity profile of aminoindane-based new psychoactive substances: 2-aminoindane (2-AI, CAS: 2975-41-9) and N-Methyl-2-aminoindane (NM-2-AI, CAS: 24445–44–1) – comprehensive prediction of toxicological endpoints important from clinical and forensic perspective using in silico multi- approach","authors":"Kamil Jurowski , Adrian Frydrych","doi":"10.1016/j.tiv.2025.106149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study provides the first toxicity profile of two aminoindane-based new psychoactive substances (NPS): 2-aminoindane (2-AI) and <em>N</em>-methyl-2-aminoindane (NM-2-AI), using a multi-method <em>in silico</em> approach. Tools including Percepta, ProTox 3.0, ADMETlab 3.0, VEGA QSAR, TEST, QSAR Toolbox, and STopTox were applied to evaluate acute toxicity, systemic organ effects, genotoxicity, skin and eye irritation, and cardiotoxicity. Both compounds were predicted to be acutely toxic <em>via</em> oral, dermal, and inhalation routes. Quantitative LD₅₀ values (rat, oral) ranged from 150 to 560 mg/kg (Percepta), 259.7–112.6 mg/kg (VEGA), and 326–360 mg/kg (ProTox 3.0). Health effect predictions indicated high probabilities of cardiovascular toxicity (2-AI: 80 %, NM-2-AI: 82 %) and pulmonary involvement (66 % and 65 %, respectively). NM-2-AI showed a higher likelihood of genotoxicity (Ames test) with a probability of 66.3 % (ADMETlab), compared to 2-AI (58.7 %). Both substances were predicted to be non-irritant to the eye, but skin irritation was probable for 2-AI (80 %, StopTox) and less so for NM-2-AI (60 %). hERG inhibition risk was low (IC₅₀: 391.7 μM for 2-AI; 126.9 μM for NM-2-AI). The <em>in silico</em> multi-tool strategy yielded convergent and interpretable data, supporting early toxicological characterization. These results are relevant for clinical management of NPS intoxications and for forensic interpretation in the absence of experimental data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54423,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology in Vitro","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 106149"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology in Vitro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0887233325001432","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study provides the first toxicity profile of two aminoindane-based new psychoactive substances (NPS): 2-aminoindane (2-AI) and N-methyl-2-aminoindane (NM-2-AI), using a multi-method in silico approach. Tools including Percepta, ProTox 3.0, ADMETlab 3.0, VEGA QSAR, TEST, QSAR Toolbox, and STopTox were applied to evaluate acute toxicity, systemic organ effects, genotoxicity, skin and eye irritation, and cardiotoxicity. Both compounds were predicted to be acutely toxic via oral, dermal, and inhalation routes. Quantitative LD₅₀ values (rat, oral) ranged from 150 to 560 mg/kg (Percepta), 259.7–112.6 mg/kg (VEGA), and 326–360 mg/kg (ProTox 3.0). Health effect predictions indicated high probabilities of cardiovascular toxicity (2-AI: 80 %, NM-2-AI: 82 %) and pulmonary involvement (66 % and 65 %, respectively). NM-2-AI showed a higher likelihood of genotoxicity (Ames test) with a probability of 66.3 % (ADMETlab), compared to 2-AI (58.7 %). Both substances were predicted to be non-irritant to the eye, but skin irritation was probable for 2-AI (80 %, StopTox) and less so for NM-2-AI (60 %). hERG inhibition risk was low (IC₅₀: 391.7 μM for 2-AI; 126.9 μM for NM-2-AI). The in silico multi-tool strategy yielded convergent and interpretable data, supporting early toxicological characterization. These results are relevant for clinical management of NPS intoxications and for forensic interpretation in the absence of experimental data.
期刊介绍:
Toxicology in Vitro publishes original research papers and reviews on the application and use of in vitro systems for assessing or predicting the toxic effects of chemicals and elucidating their mechanisms of action. These in vitro techniques include utilizing cell or tissue cultures, isolated cells, tissue slices, subcellular fractions, transgenic cell cultures, and cells from transgenic organisms, as well as in silico modelling. The Journal will focus on investigations that involve the development and validation of new in vitro methods, e.g. for prediction of toxic effects based on traditional and in silico modelling; on the use of methods in high-throughput toxicology and pharmacology; elucidation of mechanisms of toxic action; the application of genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics in toxicology, as well as on comparative studies that characterise the relationship between in vitro and in vivo findings. The Journal strongly encourages the submission of manuscripts that focus on the development of in vitro methods, their practical applications and regulatory use (e.g. in the areas of food components cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and industrial chemicals). Toxicology in Vitro discourages papers that record reporting on toxicological effects from materials, such as plant extracts or herbal medicines, that have not been chemically characterized.