Lessons Learned from Sepsis Microlearning Intervention.

IF 2.2 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-26 DOI:10.1055/a-2677-6012
Eduardo R Osegueda, Ben Webber, Tanvi Mehta, Deborah L Pestka, Joseph S Koopmeiners, Ivana Ninkovic, Genevieve B Melton, Timothy J Beebe, Michael G Usher
{"title":"Lessons Learned from Sepsis Microlearning Intervention.","authors":"Eduardo R Osegueda, Ben Webber, Tanvi Mehta, Deborah L Pestka, Joseph S Koopmeiners, Ivana Ninkovic, Genevieve B Melton, Timothy J Beebe, Michael G Usher","doi":"10.1055/a-2677-6012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Improving early recognition and treatment of sepsis is key to decreasing patient mortality. A large academic health system implemented several quality improvement initiatives, yet monthly compliance with sepsis best practices remained low.Develop and evaluate an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded microlearning intervention to address suboptimal adherence to sepsis care best practices.We conducted a randomized stepped-wedge trial of our microlearning intervention with randomization done at the nursing block level. Antibiotic delay and secondary outcomes extracted from the EHR were analyzed using mixed models to account for intracluster correlation.The microlearning intervention did not reduce antibiotic delay (mean difference = 0.71 hours; <i>p</i> = 0.49). Despite the alert firing over 30,000 times during the study period, the microlearning intervention was viewed only a total of 30 times.Our microlearning intervention did not improve sepsis care outcomes. We believe that although the content addressed key knowledge gaps, delivering the intervention through disruptive EHR alerts was not an accessible delivery channel to the nursing staff we targeted.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":"16 4","pages":"1165-1171"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12473517/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2677-6012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improving early recognition and treatment of sepsis is key to decreasing patient mortality. A large academic health system implemented several quality improvement initiatives, yet monthly compliance with sepsis best practices remained low.Develop and evaluate an electronic health record (EHR)-embedded microlearning intervention to address suboptimal adherence to sepsis care best practices.We conducted a randomized stepped-wedge trial of our microlearning intervention with randomization done at the nursing block level. Antibiotic delay and secondary outcomes extracted from the EHR were analyzed using mixed models to account for intracluster correlation.The microlearning intervention did not reduce antibiotic delay (mean difference = 0.71 hours; p = 0.49). Despite the alert firing over 30,000 times during the study period, the microlearning intervention was viewed only a total of 30 times.Our microlearning intervention did not improve sepsis care outcomes. We believe that although the content addressed key knowledge gaps, delivering the intervention through disruptive EHR alerts was not an accessible delivery channel to the nursing staff we targeted.

败血症微学习干预的经验教训。
提高败血症的早期识别和治疗是降低患者死亡率的关键。一个大型学术卫生系统实施了几项质量改进举措,但每月对败血症最佳实践的依从性仍然很低。开发和评估嵌入电子健康记录(EHR)的微学习干预措施,以解决败血症护理最佳实践的次优依从性问题。我们对我们的微学习干预进行了一项随机的阶梯形试验,在护理区水平进行了随机化。使用混合模型分析从电子病历中提取的抗生素延迟和次要结局,以解释簇内相关性。微学习干预没有减少抗生素延迟(平均差异= 0.71小时;p = 0.49)。尽管在研究期间警报发出超过3万次,但微学习干预总共只被观看了30次。我们的微学习干预并没有改善败血症的护理结果。我们认为,尽管内容解决了关键的知识差距,但通过破坏性的电子病历警报提供干预措施并不是我们所针对的护理人员的可访问的交付渠道。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信