Association Between Patient-Specific Factors and the Therapeutic Relationship in Direct Access Physiotherapy for Higher Education Students-An Observational Cross-Sectional Study.
Heidi Emilia Riska, Jaro Ilari Karppinen, Mia Eveliina Heikkala, Riku Petteri Nikander, Jari Juhani Villberg, Arto Jorma Hautala
{"title":"Association Between Patient-Specific Factors and the Therapeutic Relationship in Direct Access Physiotherapy for Higher Education Students-An Observational Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Heidi Emilia Riska, Jaro Ilari Karppinen, Mia Eveliina Heikkala, Riku Petteri Nikander, Jari Juhani Villberg, Arto Jorma Hautala","doi":"10.1002/pri.70112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain is a common issue among higher education students and is often linked to poor physical function and a high psychosocial burden. In direct access physiotherapy, a patient-centered approach is essential for building a strong therapeutic relationship. While therapist attributes are known to influence this relationship, this study aimed to explore whether patient-specific factors, including psychosocial burden, physical function, and chronic pain, are associated with students' perception of the therapeutic relationship during their first physiotherapy visit.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational cross-sectional study included 326 higher education students with MSK pain (median age: 26 years) visiting direct access physiotherapy in Finnish Student Health Service (FSHS). The Experience of the Therapeutic Relationship questionnaire was used to assess the therapeutic relationship. Patient-specific factors included psychosocial burden and psychological distress, measured with the Short Form Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (ÖMPSQ-SF) and the Mental Health Index (MHI-5), respectively; physical function evaluated using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), and chronic pain derived from the ÖMPSQ-SF. Additional baseline data, including the level and field of study, FSHS region in Finland, and gender and age, were collected. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to examine the associations between the therapeutic relationship and patient-specific factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Psychological distress (ß = 0.30, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.58) and poorer self-rated physical function (ß = -0.13, 95% CI -0.24 to -0.02) were associated with a more negative perception of the therapeutic relationship. However, no significant associations were found for psychosocial burden (ÖMPSQ-SF moderate-risk ß = -0.19, 95% CI -0.50 to 0.12; high-risk ß = -0.02, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.30) or chronic pain (ß = 0.004, 95% CI -0.22 to 0.22).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Psychological distress and impaired physical function appear to be negatively associated with students' perception of the therapeutic relationship. Integrating these factors into patient-centered care could potentially enhance therapeutic interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":47243,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Research International","volume":"30 4","pages":"e70112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12474762/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Research International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pri.70112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose: Musculoskeletal (MSK) pain is a common issue among higher education students and is often linked to poor physical function and a high psychosocial burden. In direct access physiotherapy, a patient-centered approach is essential for building a strong therapeutic relationship. While therapist attributes are known to influence this relationship, this study aimed to explore whether patient-specific factors, including psychosocial burden, physical function, and chronic pain, are associated with students' perception of the therapeutic relationship during their first physiotherapy visit.
Methods: This observational cross-sectional study included 326 higher education students with MSK pain (median age: 26 years) visiting direct access physiotherapy in Finnish Student Health Service (FSHS). The Experience of the Therapeutic Relationship questionnaire was used to assess the therapeutic relationship. Patient-specific factors included psychosocial burden and psychological distress, measured with the Short Form Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (ÖMPSQ-SF) and the Mental Health Index (MHI-5), respectively; physical function evaluated using the Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), and chronic pain derived from the ÖMPSQ-SF. Additional baseline data, including the level and field of study, FSHS region in Finland, and gender and age, were collected. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to examine the associations between the therapeutic relationship and patient-specific factors.
Results: Psychological distress (ß = 0.30, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.58) and poorer self-rated physical function (ß = -0.13, 95% CI -0.24 to -0.02) were associated with a more negative perception of the therapeutic relationship. However, no significant associations were found for psychosocial burden (ÖMPSQ-SF moderate-risk ß = -0.19, 95% CI -0.50 to 0.12; high-risk ß = -0.02, 95% CI -0.34 to 0.30) or chronic pain (ß = 0.004, 95% CI -0.22 to 0.22).
Discussion: Psychological distress and impaired physical function appear to be negatively associated with students' perception of the therapeutic relationship. Integrating these factors into patient-centered care could potentially enhance therapeutic interactions.
期刊介绍:
Physiotherapy Research International is an international peer reviewed journal dedicated to the exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to specialist areas of physiotherapy theory, practice, and research. Our aim is to promote a high level of scholarship and build on the current evidence base to inform the advancement of the physiotherapy profession. We publish original research on a wide range of topics e.g. Primary research testing new physiotherapy treatments; methodological research; measurement and outcome research and qualitative research of interest to researchers, clinicians and educators. Further, we aim to publish high quality papers that represent the range of cultures and settings where physiotherapy services are delivered. We attract a wide readership from physiotherapists and others working in diverse clinical and academic settings. We aim to promote an international debate amongst the profession about current best evidence based practice. Papers are directed primarily towards the physiotherapy profession, but can be relevant to a wide range of professional groups. The growth of interdisciplinary research is also key to our aims and scope, and we encourage relevant submissions from other professional groups. The journal actively encourages submissions which utilise a breadth of different methodologies and research designs to facilitate addressing key questions related to the physiotherapy practice. PRI seeks to encourage good quality topical debates on a range of relevant issues and promote critical reflection on decision making and implementation of physiotherapy interventions.