Addition of androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors to standard of care in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Brigida Anna Maiorano, Chiara Mercinelli, Antonio Cigliola, Valentina Tateo, Giorgio Gandaglia, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Andrea Necchi
{"title":"Addition of androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors to standard of care in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Brigida Anna Maiorano, Chiara Mercinelli, Antonio Cigliola, Valentina Tateo, Giorgio Gandaglia, Alberto Briganti, Francesco Montorsi, Andrea Necchi","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To evaluate activity, safety and nuances of androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) with standard-of-care therapy (SOC), i.e., androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone or with docetaxel, for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have evaluated different agents in this setting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to better define the benefits and risks of combining ARPI with SOC in mHSPC. A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and meeting abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) was performed in April 2025. The study adhered to PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, with progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-progression of pain and PSA, and safety as secondary endpoints. Summary hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for survival outcomes, and risk ratios (RRs) for safety. Random- or fixed-effects models were applied based on study heterogeneity. Eight RCTs fulfilled the prespecified inclusion criteria. The combination of ARPI and SOC significantly improved OS (HR = 0.74; P < 0.00001) and PFS (HR = 0.50 for clinical PFS, HR = 0.49 for radiological PFS; P < 0.0001) compared to the SOC. The benefit was confirmed excluding docetaxel. We did not show heterogeneity among treatment efficacy and disease burden, onset timing or treatment strategy. Adverse events (AEs) were not increased after adding ARPI to SOC, except from hypertension and any grade cardiac AEs. This meta-analysis supports the addition of ARPI to SOC in mHSPC, significantly improving survival outcomes. Uncertainties persist regarding the role of triple therapies including docetaxel. Identifying prognostic and predictive biomarkers is critical to tailoring therapy for patients most likely to benefit from different approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.08.017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
To evaluate activity, safety and nuances of androgen-receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) with standard-of-care therapy (SOC), i.e., androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone or with docetaxel, for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Several randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have evaluated different agents in this setting. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to better define the benefits and risks of combining ARPI with SOC in mHSPC. A comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and meeting abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) was performed in April 2025. The study adhered to PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Overall survival (OS) was the primary endpoint, with progression-free survival (PFS), time-to-progression of pain and PSA, and safety as secondary endpoints. Summary hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated for survival outcomes, and risk ratios (RRs) for safety. Random- or fixed-effects models were applied based on study heterogeneity. Eight RCTs fulfilled the prespecified inclusion criteria. The combination of ARPI and SOC significantly improved OS (HR = 0.74; P < 0.00001) and PFS (HR = 0.50 for clinical PFS, HR = 0.49 for radiological PFS; P < 0.0001) compared to the SOC. The benefit was confirmed excluding docetaxel. We did not show heterogeneity among treatment efficacy and disease burden, onset timing or treatment strategy. Adverse events (AEs) were not increased after adding ARPI to SOC, except from hypertension and any grade cardiac AEs. This meta-analysis supports the addition of ARPI to SOC in mHSPC, significantly improving survival outcomes. Uncertainties persist regarding the role of triple therapies including docetaxel. Identifying prognostic and predictive biomarkers is critical to tailoring therapy for patients most likely to benefit from different approaches.
期刊介绍:
Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.