Endoscopic Management of Anastomotic Leaks Following Left-Sided Colectomy and Primary Colorectal Anastomosis: A Single-Institution Retrospective Review.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Kavita Jain, Shruthi R Perati, Louis F Chai, Hanna Labiner, David Millner, Ray Ramirez, Veena Bhagavathi, Avik Sarkar, Daniel L Feingold, Kristen Donohue, Nell Maloney Patel
{"title":"Endoscopic Management of Anastomotic Leaks Following Left-Sided Colectomy and Primary Colorectal Anastomosis: A Single-Institution Retrospective Review.","authors":"Kavita Jain, Shruthi R Perati, Louis F Chai, Hanna Labiner, David Millner, Ray Ramirez, Veena Bhagavathi, Avik Sarkar, Daniel L Feingold, Kristen Donohue, Nell Maloney Patel","doi":"10.1177/15533506251381980","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundPostoperative anastomotic leaks are the most common complications following colorectal surgery, with rates reaching 24%. Previous studies on endoscopic management of anastomotic leaks (eg, EndoClip, OverStitch, and stenting) have shown similar outcomes as reoperation. Implementation of these endoscopic strategies for anastomotic leak management remains limited given sparse data demonstrating integration of these methods with conventional practices.MethodsA single-institution, retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients who underwent a left-sided colectomy with primary colorectal anastomosis and developed clinically significant anastomotic leaks between 2018 and 2021. These patients were categorized as managed with surgery alone vs with endoscopic intervention, and patient demographics and anastomotic leak characteristics were analyzed.ResultsOf the 14 total patients identified, seven were managed with surgery alone and seven were managed with endoscopic intervention. When compared to patients managed with surgery alone, those managed endoscopically were more often hemodynamically normal; however, differences in bowel defect size or time to leak identification were not statistically significant. In three cases, the application of advanced endoscopic techniques prevented the need for further intervention. For three other patients, multidisciplinary management with endoscopy facilitated surgical creation of diverting loop ileostomy instead of a higher-morbidity end colostomy.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates a diversity of scenarios in which endoscopic management can be integrated into management of anastomotic leaks and, in some cases, avoid the need for reoperation. When feasible, a multidisciplinary approach including interventional gastroenterology should be utilized to potentially mitigate the need for end colostomy creation and optimize patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506251381980"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251381980","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundPostoperative anastomotic leaks are the most common complications following colorectal surgery, with rates reaching 24%. Previous studies on endoscopic management of anastomotic leaks (eg, EndoClip, OverStitch, and stenting) have shown similar outcomes as reoperation. Implementation of these endoscopic strategies for anastomotic leak management remains limited given sparse data demonstrating integration of these methods with conventional practices.MethodsA single-institution, retrospective chart review was conducted to identify patients who underwent a left-sided colectomy with primary colorectal anastomosis and developed clinically significant anastomotic leaks between 2018 and 2021. These patients were categorized as managed with surgery alone vs with endoscopic intervention, and patient demographics and anastomotic leak characteristics were analyzed.ResultsOf the 14 total patients identified, seven were managed with surgery alone and seven were managed with endoscopic intervention. When compared to patients managed with surgery alone, those managed endoscopically were more often hemodynamically normal; however, differences in bowel defect size or time to leak identification were not statistically significant. In three cases, the application of advanced endoscopic techniques prevented the need for further intervention. For three other patients, multidisciplinary management with endoscopy facilitated surgical creation of diverting loop ileostomy instead of a higher-morbidity end colostomy.ConclusionsThis study demonstrates a diversity of scenarios in which endoscopic management can be integrated into management of anastomotic leaks and, in some cases, avoid the need for reoperation. When feasible, a multidisciplinary approach including interventional gastroenterology should be utilized to potentially mitigate the need for end colostomy creation and optimize patient outcomes.

内镜下处理左侧结肠切除术和一期结肠吻合术后吻合口渗漏:一项单一机构的回顾性回顾。
背景术后吻合口瘘是结直肠手术后最常见的并发症,发生率达24%。先前的内镜下处理吻合口瘘的研究(如EndoClip、OverStitch和支架置入术)显示了与再次手术相似的结果。这些内窥镜策略对吻合口泄漏管理的实施仍然有限,因为稀疏的数据表明这些方法与传统实践相结合。方法对2018年至2021年间行左侧结肠切除术合并原发结肠吻合术并出现临床显著吻合口瘘的患者进行单机构回顾性图表回顾。将这些患者分为单独手术和内镜干预两组,并分析患者人口统计学和吻合口漏特征。结果14例患者中,7例单独手术治疗,7例内镜干预治疗。与单独手术治疗的患者相比,内窥镜治疗的患者血流动力学正常;然而,在肠缺陷大小或渗漏识别时间上的差异没有统计学意义。在三个病例中,应用先进的内窥镜技术避免了进一步干预的需要。另外三名患者,内镜下的多学科治疗促进了手术创建转袢回肠造口,而不是高发病率的末端结肠造口。结论:本研究表明,在多种情况下,内镜治疗可以整合到吻合口瘘的治疗中,在某些情况下,可以避免再次手术。在可行的情况下,应采用包括介入胃肠病学在内的多学科方法,以潜在地减少对末端结肠造口的需求,并优化患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信