Integrative Study of Dipsaci Radix and Phlomidis Radix: Nomenclature, Morphology, DNA-Based Authentication, and Comparative Effects on Osteoclastogenesis.

IF 4.8 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Pharmaceuticals Pub Date : 2025-09-20 DOI:10.3390/ph18091418
Jun-Ho Song, Yun-Soo Seo, Yeseul Kim, Sohee Jeong, Sungyu Yang, Goya Choi, Joong-Sun Kim, Inkyu Park
{"title":"Integrative Study of Dipsaci Radix and Phlomidis Radix: Nomenclature, Morphology, DNA-Based Authentication, and Comparative Effects on Osteoclastogenesis.","authors":"Jun-Ho Song, Yun-Soo Seo, Yeseul Kim, Sohee Jeong, Sungyu Yang, Goya Choi, Joong-Sun Kim, Inkyu Park","doi":"10.3390/ph18091418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Dipsaci Radix (<i>Dipsacus asper</i>) and Phlomidis Radix (<i>Phlomoides umbrosa</i>) are both traditional medicines used in Korea and China for various bone-associated diseases. However, the two are misused due to similarities in name and appearance. Additionally, <i>D. japonicus</i> root frequently contaminates Dipsaci Radix in Korean herbal markets. <b>Methods</b>: We examined morphological plant traits and performed a DNA barcoding analysis using ITS2 and <i>matK</i> sequences to differentiate between these three species. The effects of root extracts on bone resorption and osteoclast differentiation, measured as tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive cell formation, were evaluated using mouse (5 weeks male ICR mice) bone marrow-derived macrophages. Cytotoxicity assays were conducted to assess extract safety. <b>Results</b>: <i>Phlomoides umbrosa</i> is easily distinguished by its verticillaster inflorescences and 2-labiate corollas. <i>Dipsacus asper</i> and <i>D. japonicus</i>, which share globose inflorescences, are distinguishable by flower color and leaf lobation. The ITS2 and <i>matK</i> sequences clearly differentiated the three species, with haplotype analysis supporting their genetic distinctiveness, enabling robust species discrimination. All three extracts decreased osteoclastic bone resorption and inhibited TRAP-positive cell formations in a dose-dependent manner. Only the <i>D. japonicus</i> extract demonstrated toxicity. <b>Conclusions</b>: This integrative study provides the current scientific names of the original species and proposes their use in the Korean Herbal Pharmacopoeia. Moreover, a reasonable molecular method for authenticating medicinal materials is suggested. <i>Dipsacus japonicus</i> shows promise as an additional origin species in the Korean Pharmacopoeia. However, processing methods that reduce toxicity must be discovered.</p>","PeriodicalId":20198,"journal":{"name":"Pharmaceuticals","volume":"18 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12472938/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmaceuticals","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ph18091418","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Dipsaci Radix (Dipsacus asper) and Phlomidis Radix (Phlomoides umbrosa) are both traditional medicines used in Korea and China for various bone-associated diseases. However, the two are misused due to similarities in name and appearance. Additionally, D. japonicus root frequently contaminates Dipsaci Radix in Korean herbal markets. Methods: We examined morphological plant traits and performed a DNA barcoding analysis using ITS2 and matK sequences to differentiate between these three species. The effects of root extracts on bone resorption and osteoclast differentiation, measured as tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP)-positive cell formation, were evaluated using mouse (5 weeks male ICR mice) bone marrow-derived macrophages. Cytotoxicity assays were conducted to assess extract safety. Results: Phlomoides umbrosa is easily distinguished by its verticillaster inflorescences and 2-labiate corollas. Dipsacus asper and D. japonicus, which share globose inflorescences, are distinguishable by flower color and leaf lobation. The ITS2 and matK sequences clearly differentiated the three species, with haplotype analysis supporting their genetic distinctiveness, enabling robust species discrimination. All three extracts decreased osteoclastic bone resorption and inhibited TRAP-positive cell formations in a dose-dependent manner. Only the D. japonicus extract demonstrated toxicity. Conclusions: This integrative study provides the current scientific names of the original species and proposes their use in the Korean Herbal Pharmacopoeia. Moreover, a reasonable molecular method for authenticating medicinal materials is suggested. Dipsacus japonicus shows promise as an additional origin species in the Korean Pharmacopoeia. However, processing methods that reduce toxicity must be discovered.

白头翁和白头翁的综合研究:命名、形态、dna鉴定和对破骨细胞形成的比较作用。
背景/目的:韩、中两国均将双头仙(Dipsacus aspper)和双头仙(Phlomoides umbrosa)作为治疗多种骨相关疾病的传统药物。然而,由于名称和外观相似,两者被滥用。此外,在韩国草药市场上,黄芪根经常污染白头翁根。方法:利用ITS2和matK序列对三种植物的形态特征和DNA条形码进行区分。根提取物对骨吸收和破骨细胞分化的影响,以酒石酸抗性酸性磷酸酶(TRAP)阳性细胞形成来衡量,使用小鼠(5周雄性ICR小鼠)骨髓源性巨噬细胞进行评估。细胞毒性试验评估提取物的安全性。结果:伞形伞形花序和2唇状花冠易于鉴别。两种花序均为球形,可通过花色和叶裂来区分。ITS2和matK序列明确区分了三个物种,单倍型分析支持它们的遗传独特性,从而实现了强有力的物种区分。所有三种提取物均以剂量依赖的方式降低破骨细胞骨吸收并抑制trap阳性细胞形成。只有黄芪提取物显示出毒性。结论:该综合研究提供了原始物种的当前学名,并提出了其在韩国草药药典中的使用。提出了一种合理的药材分子鉴别方法。在韩国药典中作为一个额外的原产种显示出希望。然而,必须找到降低毒性的加工方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmaceuticals
Pharmaceuticals Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
1332
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pharmaceuticals (ISSN 1424-8247) is an international scientific journal of medicinal chemistry and related drug sciences.Our aim is to publish updated reviews as well as research articles with comprehensive theoretical and experimental details. Short communications are also accepted; therefore, there is no restriction on the maximum length of the papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信