Clinical feasibility of motor hotspot localization based on electroencephalography using convolutional neural networks in stroke.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Ga-Young Choi, Jeong-Kweon Seo, Kyoung Tae Kim, Won Kee Chang, Sung Whan Yoon, Nam-Jong Paik, Won-Seok Kim, Han-Jeong Hwang
{"title":"Clinical feasibility of motor hotspot localization based on electroencephalography using convolutional neural networks in stroke.","authors":"Ga-Young Choi, Jeong-Kweon Seo, Kyoung Tae Kim, Won Kee Chang, Sung Whan Yoon, Nam-Jong Paik, Won-Seok Kim, Han-Jeong Hwang","doi":"10.1186/s12984-025-01736-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is the optimal tool for identifying individual motor hotspots-specific regions of the brain that are essential for controlling voluntary muscle movements-it involves a cumbersome procedure that requires patients to visit the hospital regularly and relies on expert judgment. To address this, we propose an advanced electroencephalography (EEG)-based motor hotspot identification algorithm using a deep-learning and assess its clinical feasibility and benefits by applying it to EEGs for stroke patients, considering the noticeable variations in EEG patterns between stroke patients and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Motor hotspot locations were estimated using a two-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) model. We utilized various types of input data, depending on the five processing levels, the five types of input data, depending on the processing levels, to assess the signal processing capability of our proposed deep-learning model using EEGs of thirty healthy subjects measured during a simple hand movement task. Furthermore, we applied our proposed deep-learning algorithm to the hand-movement-related EEGs of twenty-nine stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean error distance between the motor hotspot locations identified by TMS and our approach for healthy subjects was 0.35 ± 0.04 mm when utilizing power spectral density (PSD) features. The mean error distance was 2.27 ± 0.27 mm for healthy subjects and 1.64 ± 0.14 mm for stroke patients, when using raw data without any feature engineering. Our proposed motor hotspot identification algorithm showed robustness concerning the number of electrodes; the mean error distance was 2.34 ± 0.19 mm when using only 9 channels around the motor area for healthy subjects, and 1.77 ± 0.15 mm using only 5 channels around the motor area for stroke patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We demonstrate that our EEG-based deep-learning approach can effectively identify individual motor hotspots, and the clinical feasibility of our algorithm by successfully applying the proposed approach to stroke patients. It can be used as an alternative to TMS for identifying motor hotspots, potentially enhancing the effectiveness of rehabilitation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"22 1","pages":"193"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465479/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01736-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is the optimal tool for identifying individual motor hotspots-specific regions of the brain that are essential for controlling voluntary muscle movements-it involves a cumbersome procedure that requires patients to visit the hospital regularly and relies on expert judgment. To address this, we propose an advanced electroencephalography (EEG)-based motor hotspot identification algorithm using a deep-learning and assess its clinical feasibility and benefits by applying it to EEGs for stroke patients, considering the noticeable variations in EEG patterns between stroke patients and healthy controls.

Methods: Motor hotspot locations were estimated using a two-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) model. We utilized various types of input data, depending on the five processing levels, the five types of input data, depending on the processing levels, to assess the signal processing capability of our proposed deep-learning model using EEGs of thirty healthy subjects measured during a simple hand movement task. Furthermore, we applied our proposed deep-learning algorithm to the hand-movement-related EEGs of twenty-nine stroke patients.

Results: The mean error distance between the motor hotspot locations identified by TMS and our approach for healthy subjects was 0.35 ± 0.04 mm when utilizing power spectral density (PSD) features. The mean error distance was 2.27 ± 0.27 mm for healthy subjects and 1.64 ± 0.14 mm for stroke patients, when using raw data without any feature engineering. Our proposed motor hotspot identification algorithm showed robustness concerning the number of electrodes; the mean error distance was 2.34 ± 0.19 mm when using only 9 channels around the motor area for healthy subjects, and 1.77 ± 0.15 mm using only 5 channels around the motor area for stroke patients.

Conclusion: We demonstrate that our EEG-based deep-learning approach can effectively identify individual motor hotspots, and the clinical feasibility of our algorithm by successfully applying the proposed approach to stroke patients. It can be used as an alternative to TMS for identifying motor hotspots, potentially enhancing the effectiveness of rehabilitation strategies.

脑卒中中基于卷积神经网络脑电图运动热点定位的临床可行性。
背景:虽然经颅磁刺激(TMS)是识别个体运动热点(大脑中控制随意肌肉运动的特定区域)的最佳工具,但它涉及到一个繁琐的程序,需要患者定期去医院就诊,并依赖于专家的判断。为了解决这一问题,我们提出了一种基于深度学习的先进脑电图(EEG)运动热点识别算法,并将其应用于脑卒中患者的脑电图,考虑到脑卒中患者与健康对照组之间脑电图模式的显著差异,评估其临床可行性和效益。方法:采用二维卷积神经网络(CNN)模型估计运动热点位置。我们利用不同类型的输入数据,根据五个处理水平,五种类型的输入数据,根据处理水平,评估我们提出的深度学习模型的信号处理能力,使用30名健康受试者在简单的手部运动任务中测量的脑电图。此外,我们将我们提出的深度学习算法应用于29例中风患者的手部运动相关脑电图。结果:利用功率谱密度(PSD)特征,经颅磁刺激识别的运动热点位置与我们的方法识别的运动热点位置的平均误差距离为0.35±0.04 mm。在未进行特征工程处理的原始数据中,健康受试者的平均误差距离为2.27±0.27 mm,脑卒中患者的平均误差距离为1.64±0.14 mm。我们提出的运动热点识别算法对电极数量具有鲁棒性;健康受试者仅使用运动区周围9个通道时,平均误差距离为2.34±0.19 mm;脑卒中患者仅使用运动区周围5个通道时,平均误差距离为1.77±0.15 mm。结论:我们基于脑电图的深度学习方法可以有效地识别个体运动热点,并通过将该方法成功应用于脑卒中患者,证明了该算法的临床可行性。它可以作为一种替代经颅磁刺激来识别运动热点,潜在地提高康复策略的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation considers manuscripts on all aspects of research that result from cross-fertilization of the fields of neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and physical medicine & rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信