Optimizing Perioperative Glycaemic Control with Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregestational Diabetes: Feasibility and Comparative Analysis of Two Systems: A Pilot Study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik, Aleksandra Urban, Paweł Bartnik, Piotr Świderczak, Aneta Malinowska-Polubiec, Aleksandra Bender, Ewa Romejko-Wolniewicz, Krzysztof Czajkowski, Jacek Sieńko
{"title":"Optimizing Perioperative Glycaemic Control with Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Pregestational Diabetes: Feasibility and Comparative Analysis of Two Systems: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik, Aleksandra Urban, Paweł Bartnik, Piotr Świderczak, Aneta Malinowska-Polubiec, Aleksandra Bender, Ewa Romejko-Wolniewicz, Krzysztof Czajkowski, Jacek Sieńko","doi":"10.3390/jcm14186670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has changed the clinical practice in diabetes management during pregnancy; however, its application during caesarean section remains understudied. This feasibility study evaluates the performance, reliability, and clinical utility of two CGM systems-FreeStyle Libre 2 and Medtronic Guardian Connect-during caesarean delivery and the early postpartum period in a patient with pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM). <b>Methods</b>: A prospective, single-patient study was conducted. A 32-year-old woman with type 1 diabetes underwent elective caesarean section at 38 weeks of gestation. Both CGM systems were applied over 18 h prior to surgery and monitored continuously through the intraoperative and five-day postpartum period. Glucose data, device performance, and usability were assessed. <b>Results</b>: Both CGM systems provided uninterrupted, high-quality glucose data throughout the perioperative period, including during spinal anaesthesia, surgical manipulation, and postoperative recovery. No sensor displacement nor signal loss occurred. Glycaemic readings remained within the normoglycaemic range (90-100 mg/dL) during surgery, with mild elevations observed during anaesthesia initiation. Postoperatively, both systems showed comparable glucose trends, with slightly lower readings from FreeStyle Libre 2. <b>Conclusions</b>: CGM is feasible and reliable during caesarean section in PGDM patients. These findings support the integration of CGM into obstetric surgical care and highlight the need for larger studies to validate clinical benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12471142/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186670","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has changed the clinical practice in diabetes management during pregnancy; however, its application during caesarean section remains understudied. This feasibility study evaluates the performance, reliability, and clinical utility of two CGM systems-FreeStyle Libre 2 and Medtronic Guardian Connect-during caesarean delivery and the early postpartum period in a patient with pregestational diabetes mellitus (PGDM). Methods: A prospective, single-patient study was conducted. A 32-year-old woman with type 1 diabetes underwent elective caesarean section at 38 weeks of gestation. Both CGM systems were applied over 18 h prior to surgery and monitored continuously through the intraoperative and five-day postpartum period. Glucose data, device performance, and usability were assessed. Results: Both CGM systems provided uninterrupted, high-quality glucose data throughout the perioperative period, including during spinal anaesthesia, surgical manipulation, and postoperative recovery. No sensor displacement nor signal loss occurred. Glycaemic readings remained within the normoglycaemic range (90-100 mg/dL) during surgery, with mild elevations observed during anaesthesia initiation. Postoperatively, both systems showed comparable glucose trends, with slightly lower readings from FreeStyle Libre 2. Conclusions: CGM is feasible and reliable during caesarean section in PGDM patients. These findings support the integration of CGM into obstetric surgical care and highlight the need for larger studies to validate clinical benefits.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

通过持续血糖监测优化妊娠糖尿病围手术期血糖控制:两种系统的可行性和比较分析:一项试点研究。
背景:连续血糖监测(CGM)改变了妊娠期糖尿病管理的临床实践;然而,其在剖宫产术中的应用仍有待进一步研究。本可行性研究评估了两种CGM系统(freestyle Libre 2和Medtronic Guardian connect)在妊娠期糖尿病(PGDM)患者剖宫产和产后早期的性能、可靠性和临床应用。方法:进行一项前瞻性、单患者研究。一位32岁的1型糖尿病女性在妊娠38周接受了选择性剖腹产手术。两种CGM系统均在手术前18小时应用,并在术中和产后5天期间持续监测。评估血糖数据、设备性能和可用性。结果:两种CGM系统在整个围手术期(包括脊髓麻醉、手术操作和术后恢复期间)均提供不间断、高质量的血糖数据。没有发生传感器位移和信号丢失。手术期间血糖读数保持在正常血糖范围内(90-100 mg/dL),麻醉开始时观察到轻度升高。术后,两种系统显示出相似的血糖趋势,FreeStyle Libre 2的读数略低。结论:妊娠期糖尿病患者剖宫产术中CGM可行、可靠。这些发现支持将CGM纳入产科外科护理,并强调需要进行更大规模的研究来验证临床益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信