The Value of Early Active Rehabilitation on Long-Term Functional Outcomes in Neer Type-4 Valgus Impacted Proximal Humeral Fractures Treated with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
{"title":"The Value of Early Active Rehabilitation on Long-Term Functional Outcomes in Neer Type-4 Valgus Impacted Proximal Humeral Fractures Treated with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Haiyan Zhou, Liming Cheng","doi":"10.3390/jcm14186660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The optimal rehabilitation protocol following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for Neer type-4 valgus impacted proximal humeral fractures (VIPHF) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the long-term efficacy and safety of early active mobilization versus conventional rehabilitation in these patients. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary hospital involving 128 patients who underwent ORIF for Neer type-4 VIPHF between January 2018 and December 2022. Participants were divided into two groups based on the rehabilitation protocol received: the Early Active Activation (EAA) group (<i>n</i> = 64), which initiated controlled active exercises on postoperative day 1, and the Conventional Rehabilitation (CR) group (<i>n</i> = 64), which followed a delayed protocol. The primary outcome was the Constant-Murley score at 24 months. Secondary outcomes included scores at 3, 6, and 12 months, pain VAS scores, active range of motion, fracture healing time, and complications. <b>Results:</b> The EAA group demonstrated significantly superior outcomes, including a higher 24-month Constant-Murley score (88.7 ± 6.5 vs. 75.3 ± 9.2, <i>p</i> < 0.001), lower VAS scores at all time points (<i>p</i> < 0.001), greater range of motion (<i>p</i> < 0.001), and shorter fracture healing time (10.2 ± 1.8 vs. 12.5 ± 2.3 weeks, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Complication rates did not differ significantly (4.7% vs. 6.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.718). <b>Conclusions:</b> For patients with surgically stabilized Neer type-4 VIPHF, early active rehabilitation initiated on postoperative day 1 was associated with significantly improved functional outcomes, accelerated recovery, and a favorable safety profile. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the retrospective design, single-center setting, and potential residual confounding. Further validation through prospective, multicenter studies is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470890/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186660","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: The optimal rehabilitation protocol following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for Neer type-4 valgus impacted proximal humeral fractures (VIPHF) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the long-term efficacy and safety of early active mobilization versus conventional rehabilitation in these patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary hospital involving 128 patients who underwent ORIF for Neer type-4 VIPHF between January 2018 and December 2022. Participants were divided into two groups based on the rehabilitation protocol received: the Early Active Activation (EAA) group (n = 64), which initiated controlled active exercises on postoperative day 1, and the Conventional Rehabilitation (CR) group (n = 64), which followed a delayed protocol. The primary outcome was the Constant-Murley score at 24 months. Secondary outcomes included scores at 3, 6, and 12 months, pain VAS scores, active range of motion, fracture healing time, and complications. Results: The EAA group demonstrated significantly superior outcomes, including a higher 24-month Constant-Murley score (88.7 ± 6.5 vs. 75.3 ± 9.2, p < 0.001), lower VAS scores at all time points (p < 0.001), greater range of motion (p < 0.001), and shorter fracture healing time (10.2 ± 1.8 vs. 12.5 ± 2.3 weeks, p < 0.001). Complication rates did not differ significantly (4.7% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.718). Conclusions: For patients with surgically stabilized Neer type-4 VIPHF, early active rehabilitation initiated on postoperative day 1 was associated with significantly improved functional outcomes, accelerated recovery, and a favorable safety profile. However, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to the retrospective design, single-center setting, and potential residual confounding. Further validation through prospective, multicenter studies is recommended.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals.
Unique features of this journal:
manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes.
There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.