Clinical Impact of External Carotid Artery Remodeling Following Carotid Artery Stenting.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Dorota Łyko-Morawska, Michał Serafin, Julia Szostek, Magdalena Mąka, Iga Kania, Wacław Kuczmik
{"title":"Clinical Impact of External Carotid Artery Remodeling Following Carotid Artery Stenting.","authors":"Dorota Łyko-Morawska, Michał Serafin, Julia Szostek, Magdalena Mąka, Iga Kania, Wacław Kuczmik","doi":"10.3390/jcm14186682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a common revascularization approach for carotid artery stenosis. While its impact on the internal carotid artery (ICA) has been extensively studied, the effects on the external carotid artery (ECA)-a key collateral pathway for cerebral perfusion-remain insufficiently explored. This study aimed to assess structural changes in the ECA following CAS and their clinical significance. <b>Methods</b>: A retrospective observational cohort study of 963 patients treated with CAS between 2018 and 2024 was conducted. Demographic data, comorbidities, and procedural characteristics were collected. Pre- and postprocedural ICA and ECA diameters were measured via angiography. Spearman's correlation, regression modeling, and receiver operating curver (ROC) analysis were used to identify predictors of ECA narrowing and occlusion and their relationship with neurological outcomes. <b>Results</b>: The median ECA diameter decreased post-CAS (from 4.7 mm to 3.8 mm, <i>p</i> < 0.001). ECA overstenting occurred in 96.4% of cases, with 71.7% exhibiting diameter reduction. De novo ECA occlusion occurred in 2.5% of patients and was associated with a higher incidence of stroke, transient ischemic attack, and in-stent restenosis (ISR). Multivariate analysis identified preoperative ECA diameter (<i>p</i> < 0.001), ICA diameter (<i>p</i> = 0.001), and second-generation stents (<i>p</i> = 0.02) as independent predictors of ECA narrowing. ROC analysis confirmed that a preoperative ECA diameter ≤ 3.05 mm strongly predicted occlusion (Area under the curve (AUC) = 0.93, <i>p</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions</b>: CAS frequently leads to ECA remodeling, including occlusion, compromising collateral perfusion and contributing to adverse ischemic incidences and ISR. Preprocedural ECA assessment may aid in optimizing patient selection and procedural planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186682","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a common revascularization approach for carotid artery stenosis. While its impact on the internal carotid artery (ICA) has been extensively studied, the effects on the external carotid artery (ECA)-a key collateral pathway for cerebral perfusion-remain insufficiently explored. This study aimed to assess structural changes in the ECA following CAS and their clinical significance. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study of 963 patients treated with CAS between 2018 and 2024 was conducted. Demographic data, comorbidities, and procedural characteristics were collected. Pre- and postprocedural ICA and ECA diameters were measured via angiography. Spearman's correlation, regression modeling, and receiver operating curver (ROC) analysis were used to identify predictors of ECA narrowing and occlusion and their relationship with neurological outcomes. Results: The median ECA diameter decreased post-CAS (from 4.7 mm to 3.8 mm, p < 0.001). ECA overstenting occurred in 96.4% of cases, with 71.7% exhibiting diameter reduction. De novo ECA occlusion occurred in 2.5% of patients and was associated with a higher incidence of stroke, transient ischemic attack, and in-stent restenosis (ISR). Multivariate analysis identified preoperative ECA diameter (p < 0.001), ICA diameter (p = 0.001), and second-generation stents (p = 0.02) as independent predictors of ECA narrowing. ROC analysis confirmed that a preoperative ECA diameter ≤ 3.05 mm strongly predicted occlusion (Area under the curve (AUC) = 0.93, p < 0.001). Conclusions: CAS frequently leads to ECA remodeling, including occlusion, compromising collateral perfusion and contributing to adverse ischemic incidences and ISR. Preprocedural ECA assessment may aid in optimizing patient selection and procedural planning.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

颈动脉支架植入术后颈外动脉重构的临床影响。
背景:颈动脉支架植入术是治疗颈动脉狭窄的常用方法。虽然其对颈内动脉(ICA)的影响已被广泛研究,但对颈外动脉(ECA)-脑灌注的关键侧枝通路的影响仍未得到充分探讨。本研究旨在评估CAS后ECA的结构变化及其临床意义。方法:对2018 - 2024年间963例CAS患者进行回顾性观察队列研究。收集了人口统计数据、合并症和手术特征。术前和术后通过血管造影测量ICA和ECA直径。采用Spearman相关、回归模型和受试者工作曲线(ROC)分析来确定ECA狭窄和闭塞的预测因素及其与神经预后的关系。结果:cas后中位ECA直径减小(从4.7 mm降至3.8 mm, p < 0.001)。96.4%的病例发生了ECA过度支架置入,71.7%的病例表现为内径缩小。2.5%的患者发生了新的ECA闭塞,并且与较高的卒中、短暂性脑缺血发作和支架内再狭窄(ISR)发生率相关。多因素分析发现术前ECA直径(p < 0.001)、ICA直径(p = 0.001)和第二代支架(p = 0.02)是ECA狭窄的独立预测因素。ROC分析证实术前ECA直径≤3.05 mm对闭塞有较强的预测作用(曲线下面积(Area under curve, AUC) = 0.93, p < 0.001)。结论:CAS经常导致ECA重构,包括闭塞,损害侧枝灌注,导致不良的缺血发生率和ISR。术前ECA评估有助于优化患者选择和手术计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信