Carotid Doppler Imaging as a Marker for Fluid Responsiveness.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Ankur Srivastava, Christopher Tam, Samir Sethi, Mario Gaudino, Brady Rippon, Joydeep Baidya, Sanya Rastogi, Alexandra Lopes, Avika Kasubhai, Kane Pryor, James Osorio
{"title":"Carotid Doppler Imaging as a Marker for Fluid Responsiveness.","authors":"Ankur Srivastava, Christopher Tam, Samir Sethi, Mario Gaudino, Brady Rippon, Joydeep Baidya, Sanya Rastogi, Alexandra Lopes, Avika Kasubhai, Kane Pryor, James Osorio","doi":"10.3390/jcm14186657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objective:</b> Identifying fluid-responsive patients is essential in managing hemodynamic instability. Traditional static measures like central venous pressure (CVP) are often unreliable. Prior studies suggest that cardiac ultrasound (US), particularly carotid Doppler point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), may correlate with pulmonary artery catheter (PAC)-derived cardiac output (CO), offering a noninvasive tool to assess fluid responsiveness. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between carotid ultrasound (US) parameters and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) derived measurements in post cardiac surgery patients. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a prospective cohort study on 50 postcardiac surgery patients from 2019 to 2022 in a single cardiothoracic ICU. Carotid US and PAC CO measurements were obtained at four intervals: pre- and post-passive leg raise (fluid challenge) on ICU admission, and one hour later. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a ≥10% increase in carotid blood flow, ≥7 ms increase in corrected flow time (FTc), or ≥10% change in respiratory peak carotid systolic velocity (ΔCDPV). Pearson's correlation and linear regression were used to assess associations between carotid US and PAC changes. Agreement in fluid responsiveness categorization (≥10% CO change) was evaluated using weighted Cohen's kappa. Significance was set at α = 0.05. <b>Results:</b> No significant correlation was found between changes in carotid US parameters and the PAC cardiac index (CI) at baseline or one hour for ΔCDPV, FTc, or carotid blood flow. A moderate correlation was observed between carotid blood flow and FTc at one hour (r = 0.41, <i>p</i> = 0.005). Regression and sensitivity analyses showed no significant associations. <b>Conclusions:</b> The carotid US parameters did not correlate with PAC-derived CO after passive leg raise. Further studies are needed to validate carotid POCUS in this setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12471214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186657","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objective: Identifying fluid-responsive patients is essential in managing hemodynamic instability. Traditional static measures like central venous pressure (CVP) are often unreliable. Prior studies suggest that cardiac ultrasound (US), particularly carotid Doppler point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), may correlate with pulmonary artery catheter (PAC)-derived cardiac output (CO), offering a noninvasive tool to assess fluid responsiveness. We aimed to evaluate the correlation between carotid ultrasound (US) parameters and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) derived measurements in post cardiac surgery patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study on 50 postcardiac surgery patients from 2019 to 2022 in a single cardiothoracic ICU. Carotid US and PAC CO measurements were obtained at four intervals: pre- and post-passive leg raise (fluid challenge) on ICU admission, and one hour later. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a ≥10% increase in carotid blood flow, ≥7 ms increase in corrected flow time (FTc), or ≥10% change in respiratory peak carotid systolic velocity (ΔCDPV). Pearson's correlation and linear regression were used to assess associations between carotid US and PAC changes. Agreement in fluid responsiveness categorization (≥10% CO change) was evaluated using weighted Cohen's kappa. Significance was set at α = 0.05. Results: No significant correlation was found between changes in carotid US parameters and the PAC cardiac index (CI) at baseline or one hour for ΔCDPV, FTc, or carotid blood flow. A moderate correlation was observed between carotid blood flow and FTc at one hour (r = 0.41, p = 0.005). Regression and sensitivity analyses showed no significant associations. Conclusions: The carotid US parameters did not correlate with PAC-derived CO after passive leg raise. Further studies are needed to validate carotid POCUS in this setting.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

颈动脉多普勒成像作为液体反应性的标志。
背景/目的:识别液体反应性患者对于治疗血流动力学不稳定至关重要。传统的静态测量方法如中心静脉压(CVP)往往不可靠。先前的研究表明,心脏超声(US),特别是颈动脉多普勒超声(POCUS),可能与肺动脉导管(PAC)衍生的心输出量(CO)相关,为评估液体反应性提供了一种无创工具。我们旨在评估心脏手术后患者颈动脉超声(US)参数与肺动脉导管(PAC)衍生测量的相关性。方法:我们对2019年至2022年在单一心胸ICU的50例心脏手术后患者进行了前瞻性队列研究。颈动脉US和PAC CO测量在四个间隔进行:ICU入院时被动抬高腿(液体刺激)前后和1小时后。液体反应性定义为颈动脉血流量增加≥10%,校正血流时间(FTc)增加≥7 ms,或颈动脉呼吸峰值收缩速度变化≥10% (ΔCDPV)。使用Pearson相关和线性回归来评估颈动脉US和PAC变化之间的关系。采用加权Cohen’s kappa评价流体反应性分类(CO变化≥10%)的一致性。显著性设为α = 0.05。结果:颈动脉US参数的变化与基线或1小时时的PAC心脏指数(CI) ΔCDPV、FTc或颈动脉血流量之间无显著相关性。颈动脉血流量与1小时FTc有中度相关性(r = 0.41, p = 0.005)。回归分析和敏感性分析显示无显著相关性。结论:被动抬腿后颈动脉US参数与pac源性CO无关。在这种情况下,需要进一步的研究来验证颈动脉POCUS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信