Comparative Analysis of Root Canal Microbiota in Patients with Diabetes and Systemically Healthy Individuals: A Pilot Next-Generation Sequencing Study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Nazife Maide Dayıcan, Sevinç Aktemur Türker
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Root Canal Microbiota in Patients with Diabetes and Systemically Healthy Individuals: A Pilot Next-Generation Sequencing Study.","authors":"Nazife Maide Dayıcan, Sevinç Aktemur Türker","doi":"10.3390/jcm14186643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The aim of this study is to assess the influence of diabetes mellitus on the microbial flora involved in root canal infections through a comparative analysis with that of systemically healthy individuals. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 39 participants, including 21 patients with diabetes mellitus and 18 systemically healthy individuals (controls), were enrolled in the study. In the diabetic group, 12 teeth were diagnosed with secondary/persistent endodontic infections (SEIs) and 9 with primary endodontic infections (PEIs). In the healthy group, 12 teeth presented with SEIs and 6 with PEIs. Root canal samples were obtained using sterile paper points. The V3-V4 hypervariable regions of 16S rDNA from both sample types were amplified and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Microbial richness and diversity were assessed using alpha diversity indices and beta diversity metrics. <b>Results:</b> Faith's Phylogenetic Diversity showed a significant difference between diabetic patients with SEIs and healthy individuals with PEIs (<i>p</i> = 0.02). Both weighted and unweighted UniFrac beta diversity analyses indicated significant differences in microbial composition and phylogenetic structure between diabetic patients with SEIs and healthy individuals with PEIs (<i>p</i> = 0.01 and <i>p</i> = 0.02, respectively). Within the diabetic patient group, significant differences were observed between SEI and PEI groups based on alpha (Fisher's alpha, <i>p</i> = 0.04) and beta diversity analyses (Bray-Curtis and Weighted UniFrac <i>p</i> = 0.02 and <i>p</i> = 0.01, respectively). <b>Conclusions:</b> Diabetic patients showed different microbial profiles compared to healthy individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186643","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study is to assess the influence of diabetes mellitus on the microbial flora involved in root canal infections through a comparative analysis with that of systemically healthy individuals. Methods: A total of 39 participants, including 21 patients with diabetes mellitus and 18 systemically healthy individuals (controls), were enrolled in the study. In the diabetic group, 12 teeth were diagnosed with secondary/persistent endodontic infections (SEIs) and 9 with primary endodontic infections (PEIs). In the healthy group, 12 teeth presented with SEIs and 6 with PEIs. Root canal samples were obtained using sterile paper points. The V3-V4 hypervariable regions of 16S rDNA from both sample types were amplified and sequenced using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Microbial richness and diversity were assessed using alpha diversity indices and beta diversity metrics. Results: Faith's Phylogenetic Diversity showed a significant difference between diabetic patients with SEIs and healthy individuals with PEIs (p = 0.02). Both weighted and unweighted UniFrac beta diversity analyses indicated significant differences in microbial composition and phylogenetic structure between diabetic patients with SEIs and healthy individuals with PEIs (p = 0.01 and p = 0.02, respectively). Within the diabetic patient group, significant differences were observed between SEI and PEI groups based on alpha (Fisher's alpha, p = 0.04) and beta diversity analyses (Bray-Curtis and Weighted UniFrac p = 0.02 and p = 0.01, respectively). Conclusions: Diabetic patients showed different microbial profiles compared to healthy individuals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

糖尿病患者和全身性健康人根管微生物群的比较分析:新一代测序试验研究
目的:本研究的目的是通过与健康个体的比较分析,评估糖尿病对根管感染相关微生物菌群的影响。方法:共纳入39例受试者,其中21例为糖尿病患者,18例为全身健康者(对照组)。在糖尿病组中,12颗牙被诊断为继发性/持续性牙髓感染(SEIs), 9颗牙被诊断为原发性牙髓感染(PEIs)。健康组有12颗牙出现SEIs, 6颗牙出现PEIs。用无菌纸点获得根管样品。利用Illumina MiSeq平台对两种样品的16S rDNA的V3-V4高变区进行扩增和测序。采用α多样性指数和β多样性指标评价微生物丰富度和多样性。结果:糖尿病合并SEIs患者与健康合并PEIs患者的系统发育多样性差异有统计学意义(p = 0.02)。加权和未加权的UniFrac beta多样性分析均显示,糖尿病合并SEIs患者与健康合并PEIs患者的微生物组成和系统发育结构存在显著差异(p = 0.01和p = 0.02)。在糖尿病患者组中,基于α (Fisher's α, p = 0.04)和β多样性分析(Bray-Curtis和Weighted UniFrac p = 0.02和p = 0.01), SEI组和PEI组之间存在显著差异。结论:与健康个体相比,糖尿病患者具有不同的微生物谱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信