Personal Health and Well-Being Determinants Associated with the Day-to-Day Variability of Sedentary Behaviour in Community-Dwelling People with Stroke.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Lisa van Oirschot, Wendy Hendrickx, Martijn F Pisters
{"title":"Personal Health and Well-Being Determinants Associated with the Day-to-Day Variability of Sedentary Behaviour in Community-Dwelling People with Stroke.","authors":"Lisa van Oirschot, Wendy Hendrickx, Martijn F Pisters","doi":"10.3390/jcm14186560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> To improve personalized behavioural interventions for people with stroke, it is crucial to understand which factors influence fluctuations in sedentary behaviour. This study aimed to explore the association between health and well-being determinants and daily variability in sedentary behaviour over time within community-dwelling people with stroke. <b>Methods:</b> An n-of-1 study design was conducted to examine the associations between determinants and sedentary behaviour during the RISE-intervention randomized multiple baseline study. The percentage of sedentary behaviour was measured daily with the ActivPAL activity monitor. The Visual Analogue Scale scores of the determinants were collected with diaries. Dynamic regression modelling (time-series analysis) was performed, starting with univariable and followed by multivariable linear regressions. <b>Results:</b> The analysis included twelve community-dwelling people with stroke (median age 65 years), with daily sedentary behaviour ranging from 55.5 to 81.4 percent. Objectively measured sleep length was positively associated with the percentage of sedentary behaviour in three participants (<i>p</i> = 0.001, <i>p</i> < 0.0001, and <i>p</i> = 0.045), and negatively associated in one participant (<i>p</i> = 0.002). Subjective sleep length (<i>p</i> = 0.016), fatigue (<i>p</i> = 0.013) and pain (<i>p</i> = 0.0098) were exclusively associated with the percentage of sedentary behaviour in one participant. No significant associations were found for sleep quality, happiness, stress or time pressure in five participants. <b>Conclusions:</b> The findings indicate inconsistent association patterns between health and well-being determinants and the day-to-day variability of sedentary behaviour across participants. This highlights the need for a personalized approach, as the determinants associated with the daily variability of sedentary behaviour in one individual may differ from those influencing another individual.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186560","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To improve personalized behavioural interventions for people with stroke, it is crucial to understand which factors influence fluctuations in sedentary behaviour. This study aimed to explore the association between health and well-being determinants and daily variability in sedentary behaviour over time within community-dwelling people with stroke. Methods: An n-of-1 study design was conducted to examine the associations between determinants and sedentary behaviour during the RISE-intervention randomized multiple baseline study. The percentage of sedentary behaviour was measured daily with the ActivPAL activity monitor. The Visual Analogue Scale scores of the determinants were collected with diaries. Dynamic regression modelling (time-series analysis) was performed, starting with univariable and followed by multivariable linear regressions. Results: The analysis included twelve community-dwelling people with stroke (median age 65 years), with daily sedentary behaviour ranging from 55.5 to 81.4 percent. Objectively measured sleep length was positively associated with the percentage of sedentary behaviour in three participants (p = 0.001, p < 0.0001, and p = 0.045), and negatively associated in one participant (p = 0.002). Subjective sleep length (p = 0.016), fatigue (p = 0.013) and pain (p = 0.0098) were exclusively associated with the percentage of sedentary behaviour in one participant. No significant associations were found for sleep quality, happiness, stress or time pressure in five participants. Conclusions: The findings indicate inconsistent association patterns between health and well-being determinants and the day-to-day variability of sedentary behaviour across participants. This highlights the need for a personalized approach, as the determinants associated with the daily variability of sedentary behaviour in one individual may differ from those influencing another individual.

社区居住中风患者久坐行为的日常变化与个人健康和幸福决定因素相关
背景:为了改善对中风患者的个性化行为干预,了解哪些因素影响久坐行为的波动是至关重要的。本研究旨在探讨社区居住中风患者的健康和幸福决定因素与久坐行为的日常变化之间的关系。方法:在rise -干预随机多基线研究中,采用n-of-1研究设计来检查决定因素与久坐行为之间的关系。每天用ActivPAL活动监测器测量久坐行为的百分比。用日记收集决定因素的视觉模拟量表得分。进行动态回归建模(时间序列分析),从单变量开始,然后进行多变量线性回归。结果:分析包括12名社区居住的中风患者(中位年龄65岁),每天久坐的行为从55.5%到81.4%不等。客观测量的睡眠长度与三名参与者的久坐行为百分比呈正相关(p = 0.001, p < 0.0001和p = 0.045),与一名参与者负相关(p = 0.002)。主观睡眠时间(p = 0.016)、疲劳(p = 0.013)和疼痛(p = 0.0098)与一个参与者久坐行为的百分比完全相关。在五名参与者中,没有发现睡眠质量、幸福感、压力或时间压力有显著关联。结论:研究结果表明,健康和幸福决定因素与参与者日常久坐行为的变化之间存在不一致的关联模式。这突出了个性化方法的必要性,因为与一个人的日常久坐行为变化相关的决定因素可能与影响另一个人的决定因素不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信