Evidence on Non-Invasive Respiratory Support During Flexible Bronchoscopy: A Narrative Review.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
María Hidalgo Sánchez, Manel Luján, Sergio Alcolea Batres, Julia Álvarez Del Vayo, Pablo Mariscal-Aguilar, Carlos Carpio, Rodolfo Álvarez-Sala Walther
{"title":"Evidence on Non-Invasive Respiratory Support During Flexible Bronchoscopy: A Narrative Review.","authors":"María Hidalgo Sánchez, Manel Luján, Sergio Alcolea Batres, Julia Álvarez Del Vayo, Pablo Mariscal-Aguilar, Carlos Carpio, Rodolfo Álvarez-Sala Walther","doi":"10.3390/jcm14186658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Flexible bronchoscopy (FB) is a widely used diagnostic and therapeutic procedure in patients with pulmonary disease, many of whom are at risk of gas exchange impairment. FB may exacerbate hypoxaemia due to increased airway resistance, alveolar derecruitment, and haemodynamic fluctuations. <b>Objectives:</b> To assess the effectiveness of non-invasive respiratory support strategies in preventing oxygen desaturation and respiratory complications during FB. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed and Cochrane databases, covering studies from 2000 to 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on adult patients undergoing FB with any form of non-invasive oxygen support. Twelve high-quality studies were selected, including randomised trials and prospective cohorts. <b>Results:</b> High-flow therapy (HFT) was more effective than conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in maintaining oxygenation and reducing procedure interruptions, especially in patients with moderate hypoxaemia or risk factors such as obesity and obstructive sleep apnoea. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) offered superior oxygenation and ventilatory support in patients with more severe respiratory or cardiac compromise. <b>Conclusions:</b> Non-invasive respiratory support should be individualised based on patient risk and procedural complexity. HFT benefits mild-to-moderate cases, while CPAP or NIV is preferable in more severe conditions. Further multicentre randomised trials are needed to establish formal guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470464/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186658","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Flexible bronchoscopy (FB) is a widely used diagnostic and therapeutic procedure in patients with pulmonary disease, many of whom are at risk of gas exchange impairment. FB may exacerbate hypoxaemia due to increased airway resistance, alveolar derecruitment, and haemodynamic fluctuations. Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of non-invasive respiratory support strategies in preventing oxygen desaturation and respiratory complications during FB. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using PubMed and Cochrane databases, covering studies from 2000 to 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on adult patients undergoing FB with any form of non-invasive oxygen support. Twelve high-quality studies were selected, including randomised trials and prospective cohorts. Results: High-flow therapy (HFT) was more effective than conventional oxygen therapy (COT) in maintaining oxygenation and reducing procedure interruptions, especially in patients with moderate hypoxaemia or risk factors such as obesity and obstructive sleep apnoea. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and non-invasive ventilation (NIV) offered superior oxygenation and ventilatory support in patients with more severe respiratory or cardiac compromise. Conclusions: Non-invasive respiratory support should be individualised based on patient risk and procedural complexity. HFT benefits mild-to-moderate cases, while CPAP or NIV is preferable in more severe conditions. Further multicentre randomised trials are needed to establish formal guidelines.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

柔性支气管镜检查中无创呼吸支持的证据:叙述性回顾。
背景:柔性支气管镜检查(FB)是一种广泛应用于肺部疾病患者的诊断和治疗方法,其中许多患者存在气体交换障碍的风险。由于气道阻力增加、肺泡萎缩和血流动力学波动,FB可能加剧低氧血症。目的:评价无创呼吸支持策略在体外循环术中预防氧饱和度降低和呼吸并发症的有效性。方法:使用PubMed和Cochrane数据库进行系统综述和荟萃分析,涵盖2000年至2024年的研究。纳入标准集中于接受FB的成人患者,并给予任何形式的无创氧支持。我们选择了12项高质量的研究,包括随机试验和前瞻性队列。结果:高流量治疗(HFT)在维持氧合和减少手术中断方面比常规氧疗(COT)更有效,特别是在中度低氧血症或肥胖和阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停等危险因素的患者中。持续气道正压通气(CPAP)和无创通气(NIV)为严重呼吸或心脏损伤患者提供了更好的氧合和通气支持。结论:无创呼吸支持应根据患者风险和操作复杂性进行个体化治疗。高频交易有利于轻度至中度病例,而CPAP或NIV更适用于更严重的病例。需要进一步的多中心随机试验来建立正式的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信