At-Home Urea Breath Testing Demonstrates Increased Patient Uptake, High Satisfaction Rates, and Reduction in Carbon Emission Due to Eliminated Hospital Attendances, While Maintaining Diagnostic Accuracy for H. pylori.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Conor Costigan, Edric Leung, Sandeep Sihag, Emmanuel Omallao, Deirdre McNamara
{"title":"At-Home Urea Breath Testing Demonstrates Increased Patient Uptake, High Satisfaction Rates, and Reduction in Carbon Emission Due to Eliminated Hospital Attendances, While Maintaining Diagnostic Accuracy for <i>H. pylori</i>.","authors":"Conor Costigan, Edric Leung, Sandeep Sihag, Emmanuel Omallao, Deirdre McNamara","doi":"10.3390/jcm14186598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Healthcare accounts for approximately 4.4% of global carbon emissions. Gastroenterology is a particularly heavy producer, with professional organisations outlining targets to move towards carbon neutrality. Missed hospital appointments, associated with poor medical outcomes, also represent physical and economic waste to the sector. COVID-19 expedited the shift toward virtual clinics, but tele-diagnostics have not expanded similarly. We aimed to assess the feasibility of a virtual C13 urea breath test clinic for <i>H. pylori</i> in Ireland. <b>Methods</b>: C13 urea breath test kits were provided to patients in the community, who were subsequently invited to book an online video appointment with a GI lab technician to assist them in performing the test at home. Completed tests were returned to the hospital via local GP, by post, or a specified hospital drop-off point, and analysed using our standard protocol. <b>Results</b>: 423 virtual appointments were reviewed. 135 (32%) were male, and the mean age was 42 years. The test positivity rate was 22%, similar to a matched in-person testing cohort (21%). In all, there were no non-attenders, and two cancellations. Virtual patients were more likely to attend their appointments (OR = 153.9, <i>p</i> = 0.0004) than in-person patients. Virtual UBT appointments saved 9943.5 Km of road journeys, equivalent to 254 person-hours of travel time and 1.24 metric tonnes of CO<sub>2</sub>. Additionally, 300 (71%) patients returned a feedback questionnaire, of which 276 (92%) rated the overall home breath test experience as 'good' or 'excellent'. <b>Conclusions</b>: Home testing for <i>H. pylori</i> is effective, acceptable, and reduces both reliance on invasive procedures such as endoscopy and carbon emissions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"14 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470295/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14186598","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Healthcare accounts for approximately 4.4% of global carbon emissions. Gastroenterology is a particularly heavy producer, with professional organisations outlining targets to move towards carbon neutrality. Missed hospital appointments, associated with poor medical outcomes, also represent physical and economic waste to the sector. COVID-19 expedited the shift toward virtual clinics, but tele-diagnostics have not expanded similarly. We aimed to assess the feasibility of a virtual C13 urea breath test clinic for H. pylori in Ireland. Methods: C13 urea breath test kits were provided to patients in the community, who were subsequently invited to book an online video appointment with a GI lab technician to assist them in performing the test at home. Completed tests were returned to the hospital via local GP, by post, or a specified hospital drop-off point, and analysed using our standard protocol. Results: 423 virtual appointments were reviewed. 135 (32%) were male, and the mean age was 42 years. The test positivity rate was 22%, similar to a matched in-person testing cohort (21%). In all, there were no non-attenders, and two cancellations. Virtual patients were more likely to attend their appointments (OR = 153.9, p = 0.0004) than in-person patients. Virtual UBT appointments saved 9943.5 Km of road journeys, equivalent to 254 person-hours of travel time and 1.24 metric tonnes of CO2. Additionally, 300 (71%) patients returned a feedback questionnaire, of which 276 (92%) rated the overall home breath test experience as 'good' or 'excellent'. Conclusions: Home testing for H. pylori is effective, acceptable, and reduces both reliance on invasive procedures such as endoscopy and carbon emissions.

Abstract Image

家庭尿素呼气测试显示增加了患者的吸收,高满意度,减少了碳排放,因为消除了住院率,同时保持了幽门螺杆菌的诊断准确性。
背景/目标:医疗保健约占全球碳排放量的4.4%。胃肠病学是一个特别重要的生产者,专业组织概述了迈向碳中和的目标。错过医院预约,导致医疗结果不佳,也对医疗部门造成了物质和经济上的浪费。COVID-19加速了向虚拟诊所的转变,但远程诊断并没有得到类似的扩展。我们的目的是评估虚拟C13尿素呼吸测试诊所幽门螺杆菌在爱尔兰的可行性。方法:向社区患者提供C13尿素呼气测试试剂盒,随后邀请患者与胃肠道实验室技术人员预约在线视频,以协助他们在家进行测试。完成的测试通过当地全科医生、邮寄或指定的医院投递点返回医院,并使用我们的标准方案进行分析。结果:审查了423个虚拟预约。男性135例(32%),平均年龄42岁。检测阳性率为22%,与匹配的现场检测队列(21%)相似。总的来说,没有人不参加,有两人取消了。虚拟患者比面对面患者更有可能参加他们的预约(OR = 153.9, p = 0.0004)。虚拟UBT预约节省了9943.5公里的公路行程,相当于254人小时的旅行时间和1.24公吨的二氧化碳。此外,300名(71%)患者返回了反馈问卷,其中276名(92%)将整体家庭呼吸测试体验评为“良好”或“优秀”。结论:幽门螺杆菌的家庭检测是有效的,可接受的,并且减少了对内窥镜检查等侵入性手术的依赖和碳排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信