Survivors of Oncological Disease: Experience and Satisfaction with National Health Care and Service.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Tânia Gaspar, Joana Ferreira, Anabela Coelho
{"title":"Survivors of Oncological Disease: Experience and Satisfaction with National Health Care and Service.","authors":"Tânia Gaspar, Joana Ferreira, Anabela Coelho","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13182330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: The relationship between patients, health professionals, and healthcare organizations is a key factor in patient satisfaction and adherence to care. Organizations, professionals, and patients would benefit from the implementation of organizational measures to promote health literacy and post-discharge psychological counseling. This study aims to explore cancer survivors' experiences and satisfaction with care, along with identifying their primary needs and barriers. <b>Methods</b>: This is a cross-sectional, mixed study with a random and representative sample of the three Portuguese Institutes of Oncology. The patient sample consists of 768 participants, 463 of whom are female (60.3%), aged between 18 and 68 years. <b>Results</b>: Most patients reported a positive healthcare experience, particularly regarding staff attention and clarification of doubts, comfort, and ease of access. However, less positive aspects included long waiting times, limited involvement in decision-making, and difficulties understanding medical information. No significant differences were found by gender or age. Overall satisfaction was influenced by the patient's health status, with those in better health reporting more favorable experiences. <b>Conclusions</b>: Patients shared suggestions and complaints about healthcare organization functioning, especially regarding long waiting lists and inadequate conditions during prolonged hospital stays. Overall, their view of the National Health System, particularly Primary Health Care, was less positive compared to the satisfaction with the health organizations under study. This study highlights the importance of follow-up for cancer survivors, with many patients valuing post-discharge contact as a space to share experiences and challenges. The psychological monitoring of patients and families surviving cancer should be clinical practice in health organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469433/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182330","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The relationship between patients, health professionals, and healthcare organizations is a key factor in patient satisfaction and adherence to care. Organizations, professionals, and patients would benefit from the implementation of organizational measures to promote health literacy and post-discharge psychological counseling. This study aims to explore cancer survivors' experiences and satisfaction with care, along with identifying their primary needs and barriers. Methods: This is a cross-sectional, mixed study with a random and representative sample of the three Portuguese Institutes of Oncology. The patient sample consists of 768 participants, 463 of whom are female (60.3%), aged between 18 and 68 years. Results: Most patients reported a positive healthcare experience, particularly regarding staff attention and clarification of doubts, comfort, and ease of access. However, less positive aspects included long waiting times, limited involvement in decision-making, and difficulties understanding medical information. No significant differences were found by gender or age. Overall satisfaction was influenced by the patient's health status, with those in better health reporting more favorable experiences. Conclusions: Patients shared suggestions and complaints about healthcare organization functioning, especially regarding long waiting lists and inadequate conditions during prolonged hospital stays. Overall, their view of the National Health System, particularly Primary Health Care, was less positive compared to the satisfaction with the health organizations under study. This study highlights the importance of follow-up for cancer survivors, with many patients valuing post-discharge contact as a space to share experiences and challenges. The psychological monitoring of patients and families surviving cancer should be clinical practice in health organizations.

肿瘤疾病幸存者:国家卫生保健和服务的经验和满意度。
背景/目的:患者、卫生专业人员和卫生保健机构之间的关系是影响患者满意度和护理依从性的关键因素。实施促进健康知识普及和出院后心理咨询的组织措施将使各组织、专业人员和患者受益。本研究旨在探讨癌症幸存者的经历和对护理的满意度,以及确定他们的主要需求和障碍。方法:这是一项横断面混合研究,随机选取三个葡萄牙肿瘤研究所的代表性样本。患者样本由768名参与者组成,其中463名女性(60.3%),年龄在18至68岁之间。结果:大多数患者报告了积极的医疗保健体验,特别是在工作人员的关注和澄清疑虑、舒适度和访问便利性方面。然而,不太积极的方面包括等待时间长、参与决策有限以及难以理解医疗信息。性别和年龄之间没有明显差异。总体满意度受到患者健康状况的影响,那些健康状况较好的人报告了更多的愉快经历。结论:患者分享了对医疗机构运作的建议和抱怨,特别是关于长时间的等待名单和不适当的条件。总的来说,他们对国家卫生系统的看法,特别是初级卫生保健,与对所研究的卫生组织的满意度相比,不太积极。这项研究强调了癌症幸存者随访的重要性,许多患者将出院后的接触视为分享经验和挑战的空间。对癌症患者及其家属的心理监测应成为卫生机构的临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信