Commentary on Sources of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Overdiagnosis Among U.S. Adults.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Samuel R Weber
{"title":"Commentary on Sources of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Overdiagnosis Among U.S. Adults.","authors":"Samuel R Weber","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13182367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Diagnosis of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has risen precipitously in recent years in the United States. This has been accompanied by a corresponding increase in rates of stimulant medication prescriptions, resulting in prescription drug shortages. These data raise concern that adult ADHD may be overdiagnosed. This article examines factors that can contribute to adult ADHD overdiagnosis. Sources of overdiagnosis include lack of adherence to DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria, poor diagnostic practices, malingering, electronic distractions, cultural shifts in how the term \"ADHD\" has been used, and other health conditions that impair attention. More rigorous diagnostic practices are necessary to ensure appropriate diagnoses and treatments are offered. Adopting such practices will help optimize patient outcomes. Such practices include ruling out other conditions that impair attention, taking a careful developmental history, gathering information from collateral sources, and evaluating the patient for functional impairments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469559/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182367","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Diagnosis of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has risen precipitously in recent years in the United States. This has been accompanied by a corresponding increase in rates of stimulant medication prescriptions, resulting in prescription drug shortages. These data raise concern that adult ADHD may be overdiagnosed. This article examines factors that can contribute to adult ADHD overdiagnosis. Sources of overdiagnosis include lack of adherence to DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria, poor diagnostic practices, malingering, electronic distractions, cultural shifts in how the term "ADHD" has been used, and other health conditions that impair attention. More rigorous diagnostic practices are necessary to ensure appropriate diagnoses and treatments are offered. Adopting such practices will help optimize patient outcomes. Such practices include ruling out other conditions that impair attention, taking a careful developmental history, gathering information from collateral sources, and evaluating the patient for functional impairments.

美国成年人注意力缺陷/多动症过度诊断的来源评论
成人注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的诊断近年来在美国急剧上升。与此同时,兴奋剂处方的比例也相应增加,导致处方药短缺。这些数据引起了人们对成人多动症可能被过度诊断的关注。这篇文章探讨了可能导致成人多动症过度诊断的因素。过度诊断的来源包括缺乏对DSM-5-TR诊断标准的遵守、不良的诊断实践、装病、电子干扰、使用“ADHD”一词的文化转变,以及其他损害注意力的健康状况。更严格的诊断实践是必要的,以确保提供适当的诊断和治疗。采用这种做法将有助于优化患者的治疗效果。这些做法包括排除其他损害注意力的条件,仔细记录病史,从间接来源收集信息,并评估患者的功能障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信