Burnout and Moral Injury in Healthcare Workers: An Observational Study in a Romanian Chronic Care Hospital.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Enășoni Sorina, Szekely Diana, Raluca Mioara Cosoroabă, Flavia Zara, Dorin Novacescu, Cristina Stefania Dumitru, Raul Patrascu, Alexandra Enache
{"title":"Burnout and Moral Injury in Healthcare Workers: An Observational Study in a Romanian Chronic Care Hospital.","authors":"Enășoni Sorina, Szekely Diana, Raluca Mioara Cosoroabă, Flavia Zara, Dorin Novacescu, Cristina Stefania Dumitru, Raul Patrascu, Alexandra Enache","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13182278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Healthcare workers in chronic care hospitals are vulnerable to psychosocial risks such as burnout and moral injury due to prolonged patient exposure and limited institutional support. This study assessed the prevalence of burnout and moral injury among staff at the Chronic Diseases Hospital of Sebiș, Romania, and examined their associations with perceived stress and managerial support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted between October 2022 and October 2024, including 62 healthcare workers (physicians, nurses, and auxiliary staff). Participants completed a sociodemographic survey, the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), the Moral Injury Symptom Scale-Health Professional (MISS-HP), and additional items on perceived stress and institutional support. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, group comparisons, correlation matrices, and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High emotional exhaustion (MBI-EE ≥ 27) was reported by 45.2% of participants, with the highest rates among nurses (50%) and auxiliary staff (45.5%). Mean moral injury scores were moderate (mean = 5.3), with elevated levels observed in nurses and auxiliary staff. Pearson correlation analysis revealed no strong linear associations between burnout dimensions and moral injury. Logistic regression did not identify emotional exhaustion, perceived stress, or support as significant predictors of high moral injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Burnout and moral injury are prevalent but appear to be partially dissociated in this Romanian chronic care setting. Moral injury may arise from contextual ethical pressures beyond general occupational strain. Interventions should focus on ethical climate, institutional responsiveness, and peer-based moral support to enhance staff resilience.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469754/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182278","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/objectives: Healthcare workers in chronic care hospitals are vulnerable to psychosocial risks such as burnout and moral injury due to prolonged patient exposure and limited institutional support. This study assessed the prevalence of burnout and moral injury among staff at the Chronic Diseases Hospital of Sebiș, Romania, and examined their associations with perceived stress and managerial support.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between October 2022 and October 2024, including 62 healthcare workers (physicians, nurses, and auxiliary staff). Participants completed a sociodemographic survey, the Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI), the Moral Injury Symptom Scale-Health Professional (MISS-HP), and additional items on perceived stress and institutional support. Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, group comparisons, correlation matrices, and logistic regression.

Results: High emotional exhaustion (MBI-EE ≥ 27) was reported by 45.2% of participants, with the highest rates among nurses (50%) and auxiliary staff (45.5%). Mean moral injury scores were moderate (mean = 5.3), with elevated levels observed in nurses and auxiliary staff. Pearson correlation analysis revealed no strong linear associations between burnout dimensions and moral injury. Logistic regression did not identify emotional exhaustion, perceived stress, or support as significant predictors of high moral injury.

Conclusions: Burnout and moral injury are prevalent but appear to be partially dissociated in this Romanian chronic care setting. Moral injury may arise from contextual ethical pressures beyond general occupational strain. Interventions should focus on ethical climate, institutional responsiveness, and peer-based moral support to enhance staff resilience.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

医疗工作者的职业倦怠和道德伤害:罗马尼亚一家慢性护理医院的观察性研究
背景/目的:慢性护理医院的卫生保健工作者容易受到心理社会风险的影响,如由于长期接触病人和有限的机构支持,倦怠和道德伤害。本研究评估了罗马尼亚塞比乌姆慢性病医院工作人员中职业倦怠和道德伤害的普遍程度,并检查了它们与感知压力和管理支持的关系。方法:采用横断面研究方法,于2022年10月至2024年10月对62名医护人员(医生、护士和辅助人员)进行研究。参与者完成了一项社会人口学调查,马斯拉克倦怠量表(MBI),道德伤害症状量表-健康专业人员(mis - hp),以及关于感知压力和机构支持的附加项目。统计分析包括描述性统计、分组比较、相关矩阵和逻辑回归。结果:45.2%的受访患者存在高度情绪耗竭(MBI-EE≥27),其中护士(50%)和辅助人员(45.5%)的比例最高。平均道德伤害评分中等(平均5.3分),护士和辅助人员得分较高。Pearson相关分析显示,职业倦怠各维度与道德伤害之间没有明显的线性关系。逻辑回归没有发现情绪衰竭、感知压力或支持是高道德伤害的重要预测因素。结论:倦怠和道德伤害是普遍的,但似乎是部分分离在这个罗马尼亚慢性护理设置。道德伤害可能产生于超越一般职业压力的背景伦理压力。干预措施应侧重于道德氛围、机构响应能力和基于同伴的道德支持,以增强工作人员的复原力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信