{"title":"Wearables in Healthcare Organizations: Implications for Occupational Health, Organizational Performance, and Economic Outcomes.","authors":"Daniele Virgillito, Pierluigi Catalfo, Caterina Ledda","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13182289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Healthcare organizations face major challenges in protecting staff health and ensuring business continuity, particularly in high-risk settings. Wearable technologies are emerging tools to monitor occupational health indicators, improve staff safety, and strengthen organizational resilience. <b>Objectives</b>: This scoping review aimed to map the current evidence on wearable technologies in healthcare, focusing on their impact on occupational health, staff safety, and economic outcomes, as well as barriers and facilitators to their adoption. <b>Methods</b>: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, sources from inception to July 2025. Studies were included if they evaluated wearable technologies used by healthcare workers and assessed outcomes related to occupational health, organizational resilience, absenteeism, presenteeism, or cost-effectiveness. The review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. <b>Results</b>: 31 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were pilot or feasibility studies; only two randomized controlled trials were identified. The wearable technologies evaluated included continuous physiological monitoring devices, real-time location systems, hands-free communication tools, and consumer-grade devices. Evidence suggests potential benefits in improving staff safety, reducing stress and burnout, and enhancing workflow efficiency. However, economic evidence was limited and outcomes varied considerably. Barriers included alert fatigue, privacy concerns, interoperability challenges, and limited staff engagement. Facilitators included leadership support, user-centered design, and adequate infrastructure. <b>Conclusions</b>: Wearable technologies show promise for supporting occupational health and organizational resilience in healthcare, but evidence remains fragmented.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470153/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182289","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Healthcare organizations face major challenges in protecting staff health and ensuring business continuity, particularly in high-risk settings. Wearable technologies are emerging tools to monitor occupational health indicators, improve staff safety, and strengthen organizational resilience. Objectives: This scoping review aimed to map the current evidence on wearable technologies in healthcare, focusing on their impact on occupational health, staff safety, and economic outcomes, as well as barriers and facilitators to their adoption. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, sources from inception to July 2025. Studies were included if they evaluated wearable technologies used by healthcare workers and assessed outcomes related to occupational health, organizational resilience, absenteeism, presenteeism, or cost-effectiveness. The review followed the Arksey and O'Malley framework and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Results: 31 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were pilot or feasibility studies; only two randomized controlled trials were identified. The wearable technologies evaluated included continuous physiological monitoring devices, real-time location systems, hands-free communication tools, and consumer-grade devices. Evidence suggests potential benefits in improving staff safety, reducing stress and burnout, and enhancing workflow efficiency. However, economic evidence was limited and outcomes varied considerably. Barriers included alert fatigue, privacy concerns, interoperability challenges, and limited staff engagement. Facilitators included leadership support, user-centered design, and adequate infrastructure. Conclusions: Wearable technologies show promise for supporting occupational health and organizational resilience in healthcare, but evidence remains fragmented.
背景:医疗保健组织在保护员工健康和确保业务连续性方面面临重大挑战,特别是在高风险环境中。可穿戴技术是监测职业健康指标、提高员工安全性和加强组织弹性的新兴工具。目标:本次范围审查旨在绘制医疗保健领域可穿戴技术的现有证据,重点关注其对职业健康、工作人员安全和经济成果的影响,以及采用可穿戴技术的障碍和促进因素。方法:系统检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science、Embase、CINAHL等自成立至2025年7月的文献。如果研究评估了医护人员使用的可穿戴技术,并评估了与职业健康、组织弹性、缺勤、出勤或成本效益相关的结果,则纳入研究。审查遵循Arksey和O'Malley框架和PRISMA-ScR指南。结果:31项研究符合纳入标准。大多数是试点或可行性研究;仅确定了两项随机对照试验。评估的可穿戴技术包括连续生理监测设备、实时定位系统、免提通信工具和消费级设备。有证据表明,在提高员工安全、减少压力和倦怠以及提高工作流程效率方面有潜在的好处。然而,经济证据有限,结果差异很大。障碍包括警报疲劳、隐私问题、互操作性挑战和有限的员工参与。促进因素包括领导支持、以用户为中心的设计和适当的基础设施。结论:可穿戴技术有望支持医疗保健行业的职业健康和组织弹性,但证据仍然不完整。
期刊介绍:
Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.