Access to Services Within the Entrusted Budgets in Primary Healthcare in Poland from 2022 to 2025.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Magdalena Mrożek-Gąsiorowska
{"title":"Access to Services Within the Entrusted Budgets in Primary Healthcare in Poland from 2022 to 2025.","authors":"Magdalena Mrożek-Gąsiorowska","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13182358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Entrusted budgets were introduced as part of the primary healthcare (PHC) system in Poland in July 2022. This initiative aimed to increase the role of PHC and enhance the accessibility of diagnostic services and specialist consultations/advice for patients. <b>Methods</b>: Data from the National Health Fund (NHF) databases regarding contracts between the NHF and healthcare providers in the field of PHC from 2022 to 2025 were analyzed. The share of contracts with entrusted budgets in the total number of PHC physician contracts was estimated in individual voivodships, as well as in counties, using the example of the Małopolskie Voivodship. It was assessed whether there were significant differences between voivodships and counties as well as the pace of implementation of the new solution. <b>Results</b>: Only 43.1% of PHC physicians have signed contracts with the NHF for coordinated care services for 2025, with this percentage varying significantly between voivodships, ranging from 24.8% in Opolskie Voivodship to 66.3% in Lubelskie Voivodship (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). For the vast majority of voivodships, no statistically significant increase in the share of service providers was demonstrated in the period from 2022 to 2025. Access to services between counties is also highly varied (from 10.0% to 76.5%), although the differences were not statistically significant (<i>p</i> = 0.217). <b>Conclusions</b>: The results indicate regional and local inequalities in access to services. It is necessary to implement incentive mechanisms within the contracting of health services between the NHF and providers that will ensure equal access to PHC services within entrusted budgets for all patients. The range of available services should be equal regardless of at which PHC facility a patient is registered. The current regulations concerning entrusted budgets, including the voluntary involvement of service providers, are not sufficient.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182358","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Entrusted budgets were introduced as part of the primary healthcare (PHC) system in Poland in July 2022. This initiative aimed to increase the role of PHC and enhance the accessibility of diagnostic services and specialist consultations/advice for patients. Methods: Data from the National Health Fund (NHF) databases regarding contracts between the NHF and healthcare providers in the field of PHC from 2022 to 2025 were analyzed. The share of contracts with entrusted budgets in the total number of PHC physician contracts was estimated in individual voivodships, as well as in counties, using the example of the Małopolskie Voivodship. It was assessed whether there were significant differences between voivodships and counties as well as the pace of implementation of the new solution. Results: Only 43.1% of PHC physicians have signed contracts with the NHF for coordinated care services for 2025, with this percentage varying significantly between voivodships, ranging from 24.8% in Opolskie Voivodship to 66.3% in Lubelskie Voivodship (p < 0.0001). For the vast majority of voivodships, no statistically significant increase in the share of service providers was demonstrated in the period from 2022 to 2025. Access to services between counties is also highly varied (from 10.0% to 76.5%), although the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.217). Conclusions: The results indicate regional and local inequalities in access to services. It is necessary to implement incentive mechanisms within the contracting of health services between the NHF and providers that will ensure equal access to PHC services within entrusted budgets for all patients. The range of available services should be equal regardless of at which PHC facility a patient is registered. The current regulations concerning entrusted budgets, including the voluntary involvement of service providers, are not sufficient.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

在2022年至2025年波兰初级保健委托预算范围内获得服务的机会。
背景:委托预算于2022年7月在波兰作为初级卫生保健(PHC)系统的一部分引入。这一举措的目的是加强初级保健的作用,提高患者获得诊断服务和专家咨询/建议的机会。方法:分析国家卫生基金(NHF)数据库中2022 - 2025年国家卫生基金与卫生保健提供者在初级保健领域的合同数据。委托预算合同在初级保健医生合同总数中所占的份额在各省和各县均有估算,以Małopolskie省为例。评估了各省和县之间是否存在显著差异,以及新解决方案的实施速度。结果:只有43.1%的初级保健医生与国家卫生基金签订了2025年的协调护理服务合同,这一比例在各省之间存在显著差异,从奥波尔斯基省的24.8%到卢别尔斯基省的66.3% (p < 0.0001)。对于绝大多数省份来说,在2022年至2025年期间,服务提供商的份额没有统计学上的显著增长。县与县之间获得服务的机会也有很大差异(从10.0%到76.5%),尽管差异没有统计学意义(p = 0.217)。结论:结果表明区域和地方在获得服务方面存在不平等。有必要在国家卫生基金和提供者之间的保健服务合同中实施激励机制,以确保所有患者在委托预算范围内平等获得初级保健服务。无论患者在哪个初级保健机构注册,可获得的服务范围都应该是平等的。目前关于委托预算的规定,包括服务提供者的自愿参与,是不够的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信