Facilitators and Barriers to Self-Volume Management in Older Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Multimorbidity: A Qualitative Study.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Xin Xu, Yu Chen, Jiaxin Zhou, Shuying Li, Xinyue Dong, Zhiyun Shen
{"title":"Facilitators and Barriers to Self-Volume Management in Older Patients with Chronic Heart Failure and Multimorbidity: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Xin Xu, Yu Chen, Jiaxin Zhou, Shuying Li, Xinyue Dong, Zhiyun Shen","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13182353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective volume management can significantly improve patients' health outcomes, but the current situation of volume management in older patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and multimorbidity is not optimistic. This study aimed to explore the facilitators and barriers of self-volume management in patients and to provide a basis for the development of self-volume management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A descriptive qualitative research method was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with older patients with CHF and multimorbidity between January and April 2025 in two tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China. Data were analyzed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight facilitators emerged, including the hospital-community collaboration mechanism, Medicare and long-term care insurance coverage, diverse social support, the doctor-patient trust relationship, results-oriented incentives, digital health management, high self-efficacy, and strong motivation for health. Nine barriers were identified; these were insufficient adaptability of self-volume management programs, limited access to community resources, lack of standardized self-volume management tools, inadequate multidisciplinary team communication, one-way doctor-patient communication, lack of knowledge of self-volume management, physical limitations, management negligence caused by work constraints, and behavioral habits' consolidation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Self-volume management was affected by various factors. The study suggests strengthening health insurance coverage to reduce financial burden, taking advantage of family support and providing digital health management tools. In addition, healthcare providers should provide patient-centered care, enhance multidisciplinary collaboration, and address individual barriers with precise intervention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469624/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182353","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Effective volume management can significantly improve patients' health outcomes, but the current situation of volume management in older patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) and multimorbidity is not optimistic. This study aimed to explore the facilitators and barriers of self-volume management in patients and to provide a basis for the development of self-volume management strategies.

Methods: A descriptive qualitative research method was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with older patients with CHF and multimorbidity between January and April 2025 in two tertiary hospitals in Shanghai, China. Data were analyzed using content analysis.

Results: Eight facilitators emerged, including the hospital-community collaboration mechanism, Medicare and long-term care insurance coverage, diverse social support, the doctor-patient trust relationship, results-oriented incentives, digital health management, high self-efficacy, and strong motivation for health. Nine barriers were identified; these were insufficient adaptability of self-volume management programs, limited access to community resources, lack of standardized self-volume management tools, inadequate multidisciplinary team communication, one-way doctor-patient communication, lack of knowledge of self-volume management, physical limitations, management negligence caused by work constraints, and behavioral habits' consolidation.

Conclusions: Self-volume management was affected by various factors. The study suggests strengthening health insurance coverage to reduce financial burden, taking advantage of family support and providing digital health management tools. In addition, healthcare providers should provide patient-centered care, enhance multidisciplinary collaboration, and address individual barriers with precise intervention strategies.

老年慢性心力衰竭和多重疾病患者自我容积管理的促进因素和障碍:一项定性研究。
背景:有效的容积管理可以显著改善患者的健康结局,但目前容积管理在老年慢性心力衰竭(CHF)合并多病患者中的应用情况不容乐观。本研究旨在探讨患者自我容积管理的促进因素和障碍,为制定自我容积管理策略提供依据。方法:采用描述性定性研究方法。研究人员对2025年1月至4月在中国上海两家三级医院的老年CHF多病患者进行了半结构化访谈。数据采用内容分析法进行分析。结果:出现了8个促进因素,包括医院-社区协作机制、医疗保险和长期护理保险覆盖、多元化社会支持、医患信任关系、结果导向激励、数字化健康管理、高自我效能感和强健康动机。确定了9个障碍;自我容积管理方案适应性不足、社区资源获取受限、缺乏标准化的自我容积管理工具、多学科团队沟通不足、医患单向沟通、自我容积管理知识缺乏、身体限制、工作约束导致管理疏忽、行为习惯固化。结论:自我容积管理受多种因素影响。该研究建议加强健康保险覆盖面以减轻经济负担,利用家庭支持并提供数字健康管理工具。此外,医疗保健提供者应提供以患者为中心的护理,加强多学科合作,并通过精确的干预策略解决个体障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信