The role of environmental impact assessments in hospital care: Healthcare professionals' views on research and implementation priorities.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
L H J A Kouwenberg, A M Wijnhoven, E S Cohen, W J K Hehenkamp, N H Sperna Weiland, D S Kringos
{"title":"The role of environmental impact assessments in hospital care: Healthcare professionals' views on research and implementation priorities.","authors":"L H J A Kouwenberg, A M Wijnhoven, E S Cohen, W J K Hehenkamp, N H Sperna Weiland, D S Kringos","doi":"10.1186/s12961-025-01386-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The crossing of planetary boundaries, such as climate change and biosphere integrity, threatens human health, while healthcare systems paradoxically contribute substantially to these environmental challenges. Although research on the environmental impact of care activities and pathways is expanding, it remains unclear how this information is used in clinical practice. This study explores healthcare professionals' views on the environmental impact of hospital care, the role of environmental impact data and research and implementation priorities to support sustainability in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured focus groups and interviews were conducted between April and July 2024 with 31 Dutch healthcare professionals working across 12 medical (hospital) specialities with the highest care volumes and expenditures. Participants were selected on the basis of their involvement or interest in green healthcare initiatives. Focus groups and interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants have a general sense of environmentally impactful care activities, including surgical procedures, medication and outpatient visits. However, they reported a lack of quantitative environmental impact data at the clinical level, limiting their ability to make informed, sustainable choices. While participants recognized multiple uses for environmental impact data and supported integrating sustainability considerations into healthcare decision-making, they emphasized the need to balance these factors with other priorities, such as clinical effectiveness, patient safety and costs. Several research gaps were identified, including the need for comparative pathway analyses and standardized metrics. Additionally, implementation priorities, such as focusing on high-volume care, leveraging healthcare co-benefits and driving systemic changes to overcome barriers in the sustainability transition, were defined.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Healthcare professionals lack the quantitative data needed for sustainable healthcare decision-making. Targeted research and implementation efforts should focus on high-impact, modifiable care. These findings may support better alignment between environmental research and clinical priorities, thereby informing evidence-based sustainability efforts in hospital care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12870,"journal":{"name":"Health Research Policy and Systems","volume":"23 1","pages":"116"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Research Policy and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-025-01386-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The crossing of planetary boundaries, such as climate change and biosphere integrity, threatens human health, while healthcare systems paradoxically contribute substantially to these environmental challenges. Although research on the environmental impact of care activities and pathways is expanding, it remains unclear how this information is used in clinical practice. This study explores healthcare professionals' views on the environmental impact of hospital care, the role of environmental impact data and research and implementation priorities to support sustainability in clinical practice.

Methods: Semi-structured focus groups and interviews were conducted between April and July 2024 with 31 Dutch healthcare professionals working across 12 medical (hospital) specialities with the highest care volumes and expenditures. Participants were selected on the basis of their involvement or interest in green healthcare initiatives. Focus groups and interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results: Participants have a general sense of environmentally impactful care activities, including surgical procedures, medication and outpatient visits. However, they reported a lack of quantitative environmental impact data at the clinical level, limiting their ability to make informed, sustainable choices. While participants recognized multiple uses for environmental impact data and supported integrating sustainability considerations into healthcare decision-making, they emphasized the need to balance these factors with other priorities, such as clinical effectiveness, patient safety and costs. Several research gaps were identified, including the need for comparative pathway analyses and standardized metrics. Additionally, implementation priorities, such as focusing on high-volume care, leveraging healthcare co-benefits and driving systemic changes to overcome barriers in the sustainability transition, were defined.

Conclusions: Healthcare professionals lack the quantitative data needed for sustainable healthcare decision-making. Targeted research and implementation efforts should focus on high-impact, modifiable care. These findings may support better alignment between environmental research and clinical priorities, thereby informing evidence-based sustainability efforts in hospital care.

Abstract Image

环境影响评估在医院护理中的作用:医疗保健专业人员对研究和实施重点的看法。
背景:气候变化和生物圈完整性等地球边界的跨越威胁着人类健康,而卫生保健系统却矛盾地对这些环境挑战作出了重大贡献。尽管关于护理活动和途径对环境影响的研究正在扩大,但尚不清楚这些信息如何用于临床实践。本研究探讨医疗保健专业人员对医院护理的环境影响的看法,环境影响数据的作用以及支持临床实践中可持续性的研究和实施优先级。方法:在2024年4月至7月期间,对31名荷兰医疗保健专业人员进行了半结构化的焦点小组和访谈,这些专业人员来自12个医疗量和支出最高的医疗(医院)专业。参加者是根据他们对绿色医疗保健计划的参与或兴趣选出的。焦点小组和访谈被逐字记录下来,并使用反身性主题分析进行分析。结果:参与者对环境影响护理活动有一般的认识,包括外科手术、药物治疗和门诊就诊。然而,他们报告缺乏临床水平的定量环境影响数据,限制了他们做出明智、可持续选择的能力。虽然与会者认识到环境影响数据有多种用途,并支持将可持续性考虑因素纳入保健决策,但他们强调需要将这些因素与临床有效性、患者安全和成本等其他优先事项相平衡。确定了几个研究空白,包括需要比较途径分析和标准化指标。此外,还确定了实施优先事项,例如侧重于大批量护理、利用医疗保健协同效益和推动系统性变革以克服可持续性转型中的障碍。结论:卫生保健专业人员缺乏可持续卫生保健决策所需的定量数据。有针对性的研究和实施工作应侧重于高影响、可修改的护理。这些发现可能支持更好地将环境研究与临床优先事项结合起来,从而为医院护理中的循证可持续性工作提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Research Policy and Systems
Health Research Policy and Systems HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.50%
发文量
124
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Research Policy and Systems is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal that aims to provide a platform for the global research community to share their views, findings, insights and successes. Health Research Policy and Systems considers manuscripts that investigate the role of evidence-based health policy and health research systems in ensuring the efficient utilization and application of knowledge to improve health and health equity, especially in developing countries. Research is the foundation for improvements in public health. The problem is that people involved in different areas of research, together with managers and administrators in charge of research entities, do not communicate sufficiently with each other.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信