Learning from the Implementation of Disability-Inclusive Maternity Care: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sarah Clifford, Meighan Mary, Briana Kramer, Mairead C Minihane, Brina Ratangee, Erin M Gilmer, Andreea A Creanga
{"title":"Learning from the Implementation of Disability-Inclusive Maternity Care: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Sarah Clifford, Meighan Mary, Briana Kramer, Mairead C Minihane, Brina Ratangee, Erin M Gilmer, Andreea A Creanga","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13182315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: A growing body of evidence has revealed the multifaceted barriers populations with disabilities face during pregnancy and postpartum. This scoping review aimed to synthesize the literature on the implementation of disability-inclusive maternity care services for patients with disabilities. <b>Methods</b>: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PsycInfo were sourced for literature between January 2013 and July 2025. Articles were eligible for inclusion in the review if they reported on the implementation of interventions that aimed to improve quality of maternity care for pregnant or postpartum patients with physical, sensory, intellectual, mental impairments. In total, 6279 studies were screened to yield a final sample of 13 eligible articles. Key characteristics and implementation outcomes were extracted and synthesized from each eligible article. <b>Results</b>: Three of the studies targeted populations with physical impairments, five targeted populations with intellectual impairments, and five focused on populations with mental impairments. A variety of interventions were employed to improve the quality of care, targeting functional referral systems (<i>n</i> = 4), competent and motivated human resources (<i>n</i> = 4), actionable information systems (<i>n</i> = 3), effective communication (<i>n</i> = 1), and evidence-based practices (<i>n</i> = 1). Eligible studies reported acceptability (<i>n</i> = 11), adoption (<i>n</i> = 7), fidelity (<i>n</i> = 2), and penetration (<i>n</i> = 1) outcomes. The interventions generally reported high acceptability among providers and patients and emphasized the importance of participatory development and phased introduction. <b>Conclusions</b>: Significant gaps in the evidence remain across all categories of impairments. Additional research is needed to understand what types of interventions can be effectively implemented to improve the quality of maternity care for pregnant and postpartum patients with disabilities.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470062/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182315","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: A growing body of evidence has revealed the multifaceted barriers populations with disabilities face during pregnancy and postpartum. This scoping review aimed to synthesize the literature on the implementation of disability-inclusive maternity care services for patients with disabilities. Methods: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, PsycInfo were sourced for literature between January 2013 and July 2025. Articles were eligible for inclusion in the review if they reported on the implementation of interventions that aimed to improve quality of maternity care for pregnant or postpartum patients with physical, sensory, intellectual, mental impairments. In total, 6279 studies were screened to yield a final sample of 13 eligible articles. Key characteristics and implementation outcomes were extracted and synthesized from each eligible article. Results: Three of the studies targeted populations with physical impairments, five targeted populations with intellectual impairments, and five focused on populations with mental impairments. A variety of interventions were employed to improve the quality of care, targeting functional referral systems (n = 4), competent and motivated human resources (n = 4), actionable information systems (n = 3), effective communication (n = 1), and evidence-based practices (n = 1). Eligible studies reported acceptability (n = 11), adoption (n = 7), fidelity (n = 2), and penetration (n = 1) outcomes. The interventions generally reported high acceptability among providers and patients and emphasized the importance of participatory development and phased introduction. Conclusions: Significant gaps in the evidence remain across all categories of impairments. Additional research is needed to understand what types of interventions can be effectively implemented to improve the quality of maternity care for pregnant and postpartum patients with disabilities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

从实施包容残疾的产妇护理中学习:范围审查。
背景/目的:越来越多的证据表明,残疾人群在怀孕和产后面临多方面的障碍。这一范围审查的目的是综合文献的实施残疾包容性产妇护理服务的残疾患者。方法:检索2013年1月~ 2025年7月的PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、PsycInfo等文献。如果文章报道了旨在改善孕妇或产后身体、感觉、智力、精神障碍患者的产妇护理质量的干预措施的实施情况,则有资格纳入本综述。总共筛选了6279项研究,最终得到13篇符合条件的文章。从每个符合条件的文章中提取和综合关键特征和实施结果。结果:3项研究针对身体障碍人群,5项研究针对智力障碍人群,5项研究针对精神障碍人群。采用了各种干预措施来提高护理质量,针对功能性转诊系统(n = 4),称职且积极的人力资源(n = 4),可操作的信息系统(n = 3),有效的沟通(n = 1)和循证实践(n = 1)。符合条件的研究报告了可接受性(n = 11)、采用性(n = 7)、保真度(n = 2)和穿透性(n = 1)结果。这些干预措施在提供者和患者中普遍具有较高的可接受性,并强调了参与性发展和分阶段引入的重要性。结论:在所有类别的损伤中,证据仍然存在显著差距。需要进一步的研究来了解哪些类型的干预措施可以有效地实施,以提高孕妇和产后残疾患者的产科护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信