Stakeholder Roles and Views in the Implementation of the Differentiated HIV Treatment Service Delivery Model Among Female Sex Workers in Gauteng Province, South Africa.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Lifutso Motsieloa, Edith Phalane, Refilwe N Phaswana-Mafuya
{"title":"Stakeholder Roles and Views in the Implementation of the Differentiated HIV Treatment Service Delivery Model Among Female Sex Workers in Gauteng Province, South Africa.","authors":"Lifutso Motsieloa, Edith Phalane, Refilwe N Phaswana-Mafuya","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13182329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Key populations (KPs), particularly female sex workers (FSWs), continue to face significant barriers in accessing HIV-related healthcare services in South Africa. Structural challenges have historically hindered equitable HIV treatment access, worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic. Overburdened clinics, staff shortages, and travel constraints disrupted HIV services and ART adherence. In response, the Differentiated Service Delivery (DSD) model was rapidly scaled up to decentralise care and improve treatment continuity. <b>Objective</b>: To solicit the views of stakeholders regarding their interests, roles and experiences in the implementation of the HIV treatment DSD model among FSWs in South Africa, as well as associated successes and barriers thereof. <b>Methods</b>: We purposively selected and interviewed eight stakeholders, comprising government officials, implementers and sex workers' advocacy organizations. Thematic analysis was used to explore the perceived impact of DSD models and associated successes and barriers in the current service delivery landscape. <b>Results</b>: The study found that decentralization of DSD models improved access to services for FSWs. However, the criminalization of sex work perpetuates fear and marginalization, while stigma and discrimination within healthcare settings remain significant deterrents to HIV treatment uptake. High mobility among FSWs also disrupts continuity of care, contributing to treatment interruptions and lack of data on loss to follow-up. Participants highlighted the need for legal reform, increased healthcare provider sensitization, and the integration of mental health and psychosocial support in HIV services. Peer-led interventions and digital health innovations, such as biometric systems and electronic medical records, emerged as promising strategies for enhancing patient tracking and retention. Nonetheless, the sustainability of DSD models is threatened by an overreliance on external donor funding and insufficient government ownership. <b>Conclusions</b>: To achieve equitable healthcare access and improved HIV outcomes for KPs, especially FSWs, a multi-pronged, rights-based approach is essential. This must include community engagement, structural and legal reforms, integrated support services, and sustainable financing mechanisms to ensure the long-term impact and scalability of DSD models.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12470232/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182329","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Key populations (KPs), particularly female sex workers (FSWs), continue to face significant barriers in accessing HIV-related healthcare services in South Africa. Structural challenges have historically hindered equitable HIV treatment access, worsened by the COVID-19 pandemic. Overburdened clinics, staff shortages, and travel constraints disrupted HIV services and ART adherence. In response, the Differentiated Service Delivery (DSD) model was rapidly scaled up to decentralise care and improve treatment continuity. Objective: To solicit the views of stakeholders regarding their interests, roles and experiences in the implementation of the HIV treatment DSD model among FSWs in South Africa, as well as associated successes and barriers thereof. Methods: We purposively selected and interviewed eight stakeholders, comprising government officials, implementers and sex workers' advocacy organizations. Thematic analysis was used to explore the perceived impact of DSD models and associated successes and barriers in the current service delivery landscape. Results: The study found that decentralization of DSD models improved access to services for FSWs. However, the criminalization of sex work perpetuates fear and marginalization, while stigma and discrimination within healthcare settings remain significant deterrents to HIV treatment uptake. High mobility among FSWs also disrupts continuity of care, contributing to treatment interruptions and lack of data on loss to follow-up. Participants highlighted the need for legal reform, increased healthcare provider sensitization, and the integration of mental health and psychosocial support in HIV services. Peer-led interventions and digital health innovations, such as biometric systems and electronic medical records, emerged as promising strategies for enhancing patient tracking and retention. Nonetheless, the sustainability of DSD models is threatened by an overreliance on external donor funding and insufficient government ownership. Conclusions: To achieve equitable healthcare access and improved HIV outcomes for KPs, especially FSWs, a multi-pronged, rights-based approach is essential. This must include community engagement, structural and legal reforms, integrated support services, and sustainable financing mechanisms to ensure the long-term impact and scalability of DSD models.

利益相关者在南非豪登省女性性工作者中实施差异化艾滋病毒治疗服务模式中的角色和观点。
背景:在南非,关键人群(KPs),特别是女性性工作者(FSWs),在获得与艾滋病毒相关的医疗保健服务方面继续面临重大障碍。结构性挑战历来阻碍了公平获得艾滋病毒治疗,而2019冠状病毒病大流行更是雪上加霜。诊所负担过重、人员短缺和旅行限制扰乱了艾滋病毒服务和抗逆转录病毒治疗的依从性。作为回应,差异化服务提供(DSD)模式迅速扩大,以分散护理和改善治疗的连续性。目的:征求利益相关者的意见,了解他们在南非社会福利机构中实施艾滋病毒治疗DSD模式的利益、作用和经验,以及相关的成功和障碍。方法:我们有针对性地选择并访谈了8名利益相关者,包括政府官员、实施人员和性工作者倡导组织。专题分析用于探索DSD模型的感知影响以及当前服务交付领域的相关成功和障碍。结果:研究发现,DSD模型的分散化改善了fsw获得服务的机会。然而,将性工作定为刑事犯罪使恐惧和边缘化永久化,而卫生保健环境中的耻辱和歧视仍然严重阻碍艾滋病毒治疗的接受。FSWs的高流动性也破坏了护理的连续性,导致治疗中断和缺乏随访损失数据。与会者强调需要进行法律改革,提高保健提供者的认识,并将心理健康和社会心理支持纳入艾滋病毒服务。同行主导的干预措施和数字卫生创新,如生物识别系统和电子医疗记录,成为加强患者跟踪和保留的有希望的战略。然而,DSD模式的可持续性受到过度依赖外部捐赠资金和政府所有权不足的威胁。结论:为了实现公平的医疗保健服务和改善KPs,特别是fsw的艾滋病毒治疗结果,多管齐下、基于权利的方法至关重要。这必须包括社区参与、结构和法律改革、综合支持服务和可持续融资机制,以确保可持续发展模式的长期影响和可扩展性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信