Down the Digital Delta: Health Information Inequities Among Rural Mississippi Caregivers.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Danielle K Nadorff, Sujan Anreddy, Katerina Sergi, Zaccheus J Ahonle, Colleen Stouffer, Tockie Hemphill, David R Buys
{"title":"Down the Digital Delta: Health Information Inequities Among Rural Mississippi Caregivers.","authors":"Danielle K Nadorff, Sujan Anreddy, Katerina Sergi, Zaccheus J Ahonle, Colleen Stouffer, Tockie Hemphill, David R Buys","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13182361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: As healthcare increasingly utilizes digital delivery systems, equitable access and engagement are critical, particularly for caregivers of older adults in rural regions. This study examines how education levels and geographic rurality influence health information-seeking in Mississippi, a state with persistent structural inequities, through the theoretical lenses of Digital Divide Theory and Theory of Planned Behavior. <b>Methods</b>: A statewide survey was conducted among caregivers in Mississippi (N = 452) who support adults aged 50+. The survey assessed rurality level, educational attainment, attitudes toward various health information sources, perceived digital accessibility, and reported challenges in obtaining necessary health guidance. <b>Results</b>: Findings challenged conventional assumptions regarding rural digital engagement. Rural caregivers reported higher trust in both internet and interpersonal health information sources. Rurality did not significantly predict internet use or reported difficulty finding information. However, a significant interaction between education and rurality revealed an \"Outcome Divide\": while higher education correlated with more positive attitudes toward online health information in urban areas, this association weakened and reversed in highly rural contexts. <b>Conclusions</b>: These results underscore the need for strategies beyond merely improving access to bridge digital health equity gaps. Policy and interventions must address contextual barriers, such as digital health literacy and relevance, limiting the effectiveness of digital tools, even when internet access is available. Promoting digital health literacy, integrating trusted local interpersonal networks, and adapting educational initiatives to rural realities are essential for advancing equitable and effective digital health engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469357/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182361","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: As healthcare increasingly utilizes digital delivery systems, equitable access and engagement are critical, particularly for caregivers of older adults in rural regions. This study examines how education levels and geographic rurality influence health information-seeking in Mississippi, a state with persistent structural inequities, through the theoretical lenses of Digital Divide Theory and Theory of Planned Behavior. Methods: A statewide survey was conducted among caregivers in Mississippi (N = 452) who support adults aged 50+. The survey assessed rurality level, educational attainment, attitudes toward various health information sources, perceived digital accessibility, and reported challenges in obtaining necessary health guidance. Results: Findings challenged conventional assumptions regarding rural digital engagement. Rural caregivers reported higher trust in both internet and interpersonal health information sources. Rurality did not significantly predict internet use or reported difficulty finding information. However, a significant interaction between education and rurality revealed an "Outcome Divide": while higher education correlated with more positive attitudes toward online health information in urban areas, this association weakened and reversed in highly rural contexts. Conclusions: These results underscore the need for strategies beyond merely improving access to bridge digital health equity gaps. Policy and interventions must address contextual barriers, such as digital health literacy and relevance, limiting the effectiveness of digital tools, even when internet access is available. Promoting digital health literacy, integrating trusted local interpersonal networks, and adapting educational initiatives to rural realities are essential for advancing equitable and effective digital health engagement.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

数字三角洲下游:密西西比州农村护理人员的健康信息不平等。
背景/目标:随着医疗保健越来越多地利用数字交付系统,公平获取和参与至关重要,特别是对农村地区老年人护理人员而言。本研究通过数字鸿沟理论和计划行为理论的理论镜头,考察了教育水平和地理乡村性如何影响密西西比州(一个持续存在结构性不平等的州)的健康信息寻求。方法:在密西西比州(N = 452)进行了一项全州范围的调查,他们支持50岁以上的成年人。该调查评估了农村水平、受教育程度、对各种卫生信息来源的态度、感知到的数字可及性以及在获得必要卫生指导方面报告的挑战。结果:调查结果挑战了关于农村数字参与的传统假设。农村护理人员报告对互联网和人际健康信息来源的信任度较高。农村地区并没有显著地预测互联网使用或报告的信息查找困难。然而,教育和农村之间的重要相互作用揭示了“结果鸿沟”:在城市地区,高等教育与对在线健康信息的更积极态度相关,但在高度农村的环境中,这种关联减弱并逆转。结论:这些结果强调需要制定战略,而不仅仅是改善获取,以弥合数字卫生公平差距。政策和干预措施必须解决环境障碍,例如数字卫生素养和相关性,即使在有互联网接入的情况下,也会限制数字工具的有效性。促进数字卫生素养、整合可信赖的地方人际网络以及使教育举措适应农村现实,对于促进公平和有效的数字卫生参与至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信