Developing the Menstrual Myths Attitude Scale.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Gülüzar Sade, Metin Yıldız
{"title":"Developing the Menstrual Myths Attitude Scale.","authors":"Gülüzar Sade, Metin Yıldız","doi":"10.3390/healthcare13182381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Menstrual myths include practices that negatively impact women's health. Knowing attitudes toward menstrual myths is essential for protecting and improving women's health. However, there are limited measurement tools available to determine attitudes toward menstrual myths. <b>Methods:</b> This study is a methodological scale development study conducted between October 2021 and January 2023 to determine individuals' attitudes towards menstrual myths. For this purpose, the scale items prepared by making use of the literature were shaped with expert opinions, pre-application was made, and data were collected from a total of 337 women through a questionnaire and validity analyses, including exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability analyses (Cronbach's alpha), were also performed. <b>Results:</b> The final version of the scale included 20 items under 5 subscales (menstrual information, menstrual stigmatization, menstrual privacy, menstrual hygiene, menstruation education). Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.79 for the whole scale. EFA revealed five factors explaining 52.074% of the total variance. CFA confirmed a good model fit: χ<sup>2</sup> = 2876.480; df = 496, <i>p</i> < 0.05; X<sup>2</sup>/sd = 1.655; RMSEA = 0.044, AGFI = 0.910, IFI = 0.928, TLI = 0.913, GFI = 0.932, and CFI = 0.927. Cronbach's alpha was 0.790 for the total scale. <b>Conclusions:</b> The Attitude Towards Menstrual Myths scale is a valid and reliable tool for determining women's attitudes toward menstrual myths. It is recommended that further testing be conducted for use by different groups, men and gender-neutral individuals.</p>","PeriodicalId":12977,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare","volume":"13 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12469603/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare13182381","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Menstrual myths include practices that negatively impact women's health. Knowing attitudes toward menstrual myths is essential for protecting and improving women's health. However, there are limited measurement tools available to determine attitudes toward menstrual myths. Methods: This study is a methodological scale development study conducted between October 2021 and January 2023 to determine individuals' attitudes towards menstrual myths. For this purpose, the scale items prepared by making use of the literature were shaped with expert opinions, pre-application was made, and data were collected from a total of 337 women through a questionnaire and validity analyses, including exploratory factor analysis (EFA), confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and reliability analyses (Cronbach's alpha), were also performed. Results: The final version of the scale included 20 items under 5 subscales (menstrual information, menstrual stigmatization, menstrual privacy, menstrual hygiene, menstruation education). Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.79 for the whole scale. EFA revealed five factors explaining 52.074% of the total variance. CFA confirmed a good model fit: χ2 = 2876.480; df = 496, p < 0.05; X2/sd = 1.655; RMSEA = 0.044, AGFI = 0.910, IFI = 0.928, TLI = 0.913, GFI = 0.932, and CFI = 0.927. Cronbach's alpha was 0.790 for the total scale. Conclusions: The Attitude Towards Menstrual Myths scale is a valid and reliable tool for determining women's attitudes toward menstrual myths. It is recommended that further testing be conducted for use by different groups, men and gender-neutral individuals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

制定月经神话态度量表。
背景:经期神话包括对妇女健康产生负面影响的做法。了解人们对经期神话的态度对于保护和改善妇女健康至关重要。然而,有有限的测量工具可用来确定对月经神话的态度。方法:本研究是一项方法学量表开发研究,于2021年10月至2023年1月进行,以确定个体对月经神话的态度。为此,利用文献编制的量表项目经专家意见定型,进行预应用,并通过问卷调查和效度分析,包括探索性因子分析(EFA)、验证性因子分析(CFA)和信度分析(Cronbach’s alpha),对337名女性进行数据收集。结果:终版量表包括月经信息、月经污名化、月经隐私、月经卫生、月经教育5个分量表共20个条目。整个量表的Cronbach's alpha系数为0.79。EFA揭示的5个因素解释了总方差的52.074%。CFA证实模型拟合良好:χ2 = 2876.480;Df = 496, p < 0.05;X2/sd = 1.655;RMSEA = 0.044, AGFI = 0.910, IFI = 0.928, TLI = 0.913, GFI = 0.932, CFI = 0.927。总量表的Cronbach's alpha为0.790。结论:月经迷思态度量表是测定女性月经迷思态度的有效、可靠的工具。建议进行进一步的检测,以供不同群体、男性和性别中立的个人使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Healthcare
Healthcare Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: Healthcare (ISSN 2227-9032) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal (free for readers), which publishes original theoretical and empirical work in the interdisciplinary area of all aspects of medicine and health care research. Healthcare publishes Original Research Articles, Reviews, Case Reports, Research Notes and Short Communications. We encourage researchers to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. For theoretical papers, full details of proofs must be provided so that the results can be checked; for experimental papers, full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Additionally, electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculations, experimental procedure, etc., can be deposited along with the publication as “Supplementary Material”.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信