A Real-World Study Comparing Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems During Pregnancy in Women with Type 1 Diabetes.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Carmen Quirós, Ana M Wägner, Sharona Azriel, Berta Soldevila, Pilar I Beato-Vibora, Mayte Herrera Arranz, Lía Nattero, María José Picón-César, Elisenda Climent, Judit Amigó, Natalia Colomo, María Durán-Martínez, Macarena Alpañes Buesa, Ana Megía, Irene Vinagre, Begoña Vega Guedes, Gonzalo Díaz-Soto, Orosia Bandrés, Beatriz Barquiel, Cristina López Tinocco, Rosa Márquez-Pardo, Maria A Martínez-Brocca, Rosa Corcoy, Mercè Codina, María Piedra, Ángel Rebollo Román, Martín Cuesta, Gema López-Gallardo, Maria M Goya Canino, Fernando Bugatto, Lilian C Mendoza, María Del Pilar Olvera Márquez, Verónica Perea
{"title":"A Real-World Study Comparing Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems During Pregnancy in Women with Type 1 Diabetes.","authors":"Carmen Quirós, Ana M Wägner, Sharona Azriel, Berta Soldevila, Pilar I Beato-Vibora, Mayte Herrera Arranz, Lía Nattero, María José Picón-César, Elisenda Climent, Judit Amigó, Natalia Colomo, María Durán-Martínez, Macarena Alpañes Buesa, Ana Megía, Irene Vinagre, Begoña Vega Guedes, Gonzalo Díaz-Soto, Orosia Bandrés, Beatriz Barquiel, Cristina López Tinocco, Rosa Márquez-Pardo, Maria A Martínez-Brocca, Rosa Corcoy, Mercè Codina, María Piedra, Ángel Rebollo Román, Martín Cuesta, Gema López-Gallardo, Maria M Goya Canino, Fernando Bugatto, Lilian C Mendoza, María Del Pilar Olvera Márquez, Verónica Perea","doi":"10.1177/15209156251379488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To compare maternal glucose metrics and pregnancy outcomes of three advanced hybrid closed-loop (aHCL) systems (MiniMed 780G®, CamAPS® FX, and Tandem Control-IQ) in a real-world, multicenter cohort of pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. <b><i>Research Design and Methods:</i></b> Cohort study including 137 pregnant women with type 1 diabetes using aHCL from 27 hospitals in Spain. Participants were grouped according to the aHCL system used: 85 MiniMed 780G (62%), 38 CamAPS FX (27.7%), and 14 Control-IQ (10.2%). Maternal glucose metrics (HbA1c and time spent within [TIRp], below [TBRp], and above [TARp] the pregnancy-specific glucose range 3.5-7.8 mmol/L), as well as pregnancy outcomes, were analyzed. Adjusted models were applied to account for potential confounding factors. <b><i>Results:</i></b> No between-group differences in HbA1c levels were observed at baseline. By the third trimester, CamAPS FX and Control-IQ users had significantly lower HbA1c levels compared with the MiniMed 780G group (β<sub>adjusted</sub> -4.77 mmol/mol, 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.40 to -2.13; and β<sub>adjusted</sub> -4.79, 95% CI -8.53 to -1.06; respectively). In the second trimester, CamAPS FX was associated with a higher percentage of time in range (β<sub>adjusted</sub> +5.88%, 95% CI 1.09 to 10.67) and a lower percentage of time above range (β<sub>adjusted</sub> -6.36%, 95% CI -11.46 to -1.26) compared with MiniMed 780G, with no other significant differences observed in other trimesters. Both CamAPS FX and Control-IQ were associated with lower odds of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants (CamAPS FX: OR<sub>adjusted</sub> 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.77; Control-IQ: OR<sub>adjusted</sub> 0.10, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.99) compared with MiniMed 780G. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In this multicenter observational study, CamAPS FX and Control-IQ users achieved better glycemic metrics and lower odds of delivering LGA infants compared with those using MiniMed 780G. These findings warrant investigation to confirm associations and inform individualized clinical decision-making in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156251379488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare maternal glucose metrics and pregnancy outcomes of three advanced hybrid closed-loop (aHCL) systems (MiniMed 780G®, CamAPS® FX, and Tandem Control-IQ) in a real-world, multicenter cohort of pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Research Design and Methods: Cohort study including 137 pregnant women with type 1 diabetes using aHCL from 27 hospitals in Spain. Participants were grouped according to the aHCL system used: 85 MiniMed 780G (62%), 38 CamAPS FX (27.7%), and 14 Control-IQ (10.2%). Maternal glucose metrics (HbA1c and time spent within [TIRp], below [TBRp], and above [TARp] the pregnancy-specific glucose range 3.5-7.8 mmol/L), as well as pregnancy outcomes, were analyzed. Adjusted models were applied to account for potential confounding factors. Results: No between-group differences in HbA1c levels were observed at baseline. By the third trimester, CamAPS FX and Control-IQ users had significantly lower HbA1c levels compared with the MiniMed 780G group (βadjusted -4.77 mmol/mol, 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.40 to -2.13; and βadjusted -4.79, 95% CI -8.53 to -1.06; respectively). In the second trimester, CamAPS FX was associated with a higher percentage of time in range (βadjusted +5.88%, 95% CI 1.09 to 10.67) and a lower percentage of time above range (βadjusted -6.36%, 95% CI -11.46 to -1.26) compared with MiniMed 780G, with no other significant differences observed in other trimesters. Both CamAPS FX and Control-IQ were associated with lower odds of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants (CamAPS FX: ORadjusted 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.77; Control-IQ: ORadjusted 0.10, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.99) compared with MiniMed 780G. Conclusions: In this multicenter observational study, CamAPS FX and Control-IQ users achieved better glycemic metrics and lower odds of delivering LGA infants compared with those using MiniMed 780G. These findings warrant investigation to confirm associations and inform individualized clinical decision-making in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes.

一项比较妊娠期1型糖尿病妇女先进混合闭环系统的真实世界研究。
目的:比较三种先进混合闭环(aHCL)系统(MiniMed 780G®、CamAPS®FX和Tandem Control-IQ)在现实世界多中心1型糖尿病孕妇队列中的孕妇血糖指标和妊娠结局。研究设计和方法:队列研究包括来自西班牙27家医院的137名使用aHCL的1型糖尿病孕妇。参与者根据所使用的aHCL系统进行分组:85个MiniMed 780G(62%), 38个CamAPS FX(27.7%)和14个Control-IQ(10.2%)。分析孕妇血糖指标(HbA1c和在[TIRp]、[TBRp]和[TARp](妊娠特异性血糖范围3.5-7.8 mmol/L)内停留的时间,以及妊娠结局。应用调整后的模型来考虑潜在的混杂因素。结果:基线时各组间HbA1c水平无差异。到妊娠晚期,CamAPS FX和Control-IQ使用者的HbA1c水平明显低于MiniMed 780G组(β调整为-4.77 mmol/mol, 95%可信区间[CI] -7.40至-2.13;β调整为-4.79,95%可信区间分别为-8.53至-1.06)。在妊娠中期,CamAPS FX与MiniMed 780G相比,在范围内的时间百分比更高(β调整为+5.88%,95% CI 1.09至10.67),在范围以上的时间百分比更低(β调整为-6.36%,95% CI -11.46至-1.26),在其他三个月没有观察到其他显著差异。与MiniMed 780G相比,CamAPS FX和Control-IQ与大胎龄儿(LGA)的几率较低相关(CamAPS FX:经校正后为0.25,95% CI 0.08至0.77;Control-IQ:经校正后为0.10,95% CI 0.01至0.99)。结论:在这项多中心观察性研究中,与使用MiniMed 780G的患者相比,CamAPS FX和Control-IQ用户获得了更好的血糖指标,分娩LGA婴儿的几率更低。这些发现值得进一步调查,以确认相关关系,并为1型糖尿病孕妇的个体化临床决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes technology & therapeutics
Diabetes technology & therapeutics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
14.80%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信