Carmen Quirós, Ana M Wägner, Sharona Azriel, Berta Soldevila, Pilar I Beato-Vibora, Mayte Herrera Arranz, Lía Nattero, María José Picón-César, Elisenda Climent, Judit Amigó, Natalia Colomo, María Durán-Martínez, Macarena Alpañes Buesa, Ana Megía, Irene Vinagre, Begoña Vega Guedes, Gonzalo Díaz-Soto, Orosia Bandrés, Beatriz Barquiel, Cristina López Tinocco, Rosa Márquez-Pardo, Maria A Martínez-Brocca, Rosa Corcoy, Mercè Codina, María Piedra, Ángel Rebollo Román, Martín Cuesta, Gema López-Gallardo, Maria M Goya Canino, Fernando Bugatto, Lilian C Mendoza, María Del Pilar Olvera Márquez, Verónica Perea
{"title":"A Real-World Study Comparing Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Systems During Pregnancy in Women with Type 1 Diabetes.","authors":"Carmen Quirós, Ana M Wägner, Sharona Azriel, Berta Soldevila, Pilar I Beato-Vibora, Mayte Herrera Arranz, Lía Nattero, María José Picón-César, Elisenda Climent, Judit Amigó, Natalia Colomo, María Durán-Martínez, Macarena Alpañes Buesa, Ana Megía, Irene Vinagre, Begoña Vega Guedes, Gonzalo Díaz-Soto, Orosia Bandrés, Beatriz Barquiel, Cristina López Tinocco, Rosa Márquez-Pardo, Maria A Martínez-Brocca, Rosa Corcoy, Mercè Codina, María Piedra, Ángel Rebollo Román, Martín Cuesta, Gema López-Gallardo, Maria M Goya Canino, Fernando Bugatto, Lilian C Mendoza, María Del Pilar Olvera Márquez, Verónica Perea","doi":"10.1177/15209156251379488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Objective:</i></b> To compare maternal glucose metrics and pregnancy outcomes of three advanced hybrid closed-loop (aHCL) systems (MiniMed 780G®, CamAPS® FX, and Tandem Control-IQ) in a real-world, multicenter cohort of pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. <b><i>Research Design and Methods:</i></b> Cohort study including 137 pregnant women with type 1 diabetes using aHCL from 27 hospitals in Spain. Participants were grouped according to the aHCL system used: 85 MiniMed 780G (62%), 38 CamAPS FX (27.7%), and 14 Control-IQ (10.2%). Maternal glucose metrics (HbA1c and time spent within [TIRp], below [TBRp], and above [TARp] the pregnancy-specific glucose range 3.5-7.8 mmol/L), as well as pregnancy outcomes, were analyzed. Adjusted models were applied to account for potential confounding factors. <b><i>Results:</i></b> No between-group differences in HbA1c levels were observed at baseline. By the third trimester, CamAPS FX and Control-IQ users had significantly lower HbA1c levels compared with the MiniMed 780G group (β<sub>adjusted</sub> -4.77 mmol/mol, 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.40 to -2.13; and β<sub>adjusted</sub> -4.79, 95% CI -8.53 to -1.06; respectively). In the second trimester, CamAPS FX was associated with a higher percentage of time in range (β<sub>adjusted</sub> +5.88%, 95% CI 1.09 to 10.67) and a lower percentage of time above range (β<sub>adjusted</sub> -6.36%, 95% CI -11.46 to -1.26) compared with MiniMed 780G, with no other significant differences observed in other trimesters. Both CamAPS FX and Control-IQ were associated with lower odds of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants (CamAPS FX: OR<sub>adjusted</sub> 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.77; Control-IQ: OR<sub>adjusted</sub> 0.10, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.99) compared with MiniMed 780G. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In this multicenter observational study, CamAPS FX and Control-IQ users achieved better glycemic metrics and lower odds of delivering LGA infants compared with those using MiniMed 780G. These findings warrant investigation to confirm associations and inform individualized clinical decision-making in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11159,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes technology & therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156251379488","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To compare maternal glucose metrics and pregnancy outcomes of three advanced hybrid closed-loop (aHCL) systems (MiniMed 780G®, CamAPS® FX, and Tandem Control-IQ) in a real-world, multicenter cohort of pregnant women with type 1 diabetes. Research Design and Methods: Cohort study including 137 pregnant women with type 1 diabetes using aHCL from 27 hospitals in Spain. Participants were grouped according to the aHCL system used: 85 MiniMed 780G (62%), 38 CamAPS FX (27.7%), and 14 Control-IQ (10.2%). Maternal glucose metrics (HbA1c and time spent within [TIRp], below [TBRp], and above [TARp] the pregnancy-specific glucose range 3.5-7.8 mmol/L), as well as pregnancy outcomes, were analyzed. Adjusted models were applied to account for potential confounding factors. Results: No between-group differences in HbA1c levels were observed at baseline. By the third trimester, CamAPS FX and Control-IQ users had significantly lower HbA1c levels compared with the MiniMed 780G group (βadjusted -4.77 mmol/mol, 95% confidence interval [CI] -7.40 to -2.13; and βadjusted -4.79, 95% CI -8.53 to -1.06; respectively). In the second trimester, CamAPS FX was associated with a higher percentage of time in range (βadjusted +5.88%, 95% CI 1.09 to 10.67) and a lower percentage of time above range (βadjusted -6.36%, 95% CI -11.46 to -1.26) compared with MiniMed 780G, with no other significant differences observed in other trimesters. Both CamAPS FX and Control-IQ were associated with lower odds of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants (CamAPS FX: ORadjusted 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.77; Control-IQ: ORadjusted 0.10, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.99) compared with MiniMed 780G. Conclusions: In this multicenter observational study, CamAPS FX and Control-IQ users achieved better glycemic metrics and lower odds of delivering LGA infants compared with those using MiniMed 780G. These findings warrant investigation to confirm associations and inform individualized clinical decision-making in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes.
期刊介绍:
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics is the only peer-reviewed journal providing healthcare professionals with information on new devices, drugs, drug delivery systems, and software for managing patients with diabetes. This leading international journal delivers practical information and comprehensive coverage of cutting-edge technologies and therapeutics in the field, and each issue highlights new pharmacological and device developments to optimize patient care.