Wellness interventions in surgery: a scoping review.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Canadian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2025-09-26 Print Date: 2025-09-01 DOI:10.1503/cjs.009124
Kimberley Yuen, Olivia Ginty, Kaitlyn Rourke, Michael Hendry, Natasha Cohen, Glykeria Martou
{"title":"Wellness interventions in surgery: a scoping review.","authors":"Kimberley Yuen, Olivia Ginty, Kaitlyn Rourke, Michael Hendry, Natasha Cohen, Glykeria Martou","doi":"10.1503/cjs.009124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wellness research has expanded in surgery owing to the high prevalence of burnout. In this scoping review, we aim to identify trends of wellness interventions for surgeons and surgical trainees.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified studies on wellness interventions across surgical specialties. We categorized interventions based on the targeted wellness domain, including physical, social, emotional, intellectual, and occupational domains.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 49 studies in the final analysis. Most focused on resident wellness (<i>n</i> = 40) and were categorized as an individual-level intervention (<i>n</i> = 21). General surgery was represented in most studies (<i>n</i> = 24). Interventions focused on ergonomics, mindfulness, stress reduction, work hours, and wellness programs. Since 2015, there has been a shift in the wellness domains addressed from physical and occupational, to mostly emotional.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The prevalence of individual-level interventions targeting emotional wellness reflects a belief that surgeons are responsible for their own wellness. Studies to date have largely focused on surgical trainees, with a dearth of research on measures to improve staff surgeon wellness. Methodologically sound intervention studies with objective outcome measures are lacking and needed to facilitate a culture of shared organizational responsibility for surgeon well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":9573,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","volume":"68 5","pages":"E376-E392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12479134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.009124","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Wellness research has expanded in surgery owing to the high prevalence of burnout. In this scoping review, we aim to identify trends of wellness interventions for surgeons and surgical trainees.

Methods: We identified studies on wellness interventions across surgical specialties. We categorized interventions based on the targeted wellness domain, including physical, social, emotional, intellectual, and occupational domains.

Results: We included 49 studies in the final analysis. Most focused on resident wellness (n = 40) and were categorized as an individual-level intervention (n = 21). General surgery was represented in most studies (n = 24). Interventions focused on ergonomics, mindfulness, stress reduction, work hours, and wellness programs. Since 2015, there has been a shift in the wellness domains addressed from physical and occupational, to mostly emotional.

Conclusion: The prevalence of individual-level interventions targeting emotional wellness reflects a belief that surgeons are responsible for their own wellness. Studies to date have largely focused on surgical trainees, with a dearth of research on measures to improve staff surgeon wellness. Methodologically sound intervention studies with objective outcome measures are lacking and needed to facilitate a culture of shared organizational responsibility for surgeon well-being.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

手术中的健康干预:范围综述。
背景:由于职业倦怠的高发,健康研究已经扩展到外科领域。在这个范围审查,我们的目的是确定健康干预外科医生和外科培训生的趋势。方法:我们确定了跨外科专业的健康干预研究。我们根据目标健康领域对干预措施进行分类,包括身体、社会、情感、智力和职业领域。结果:最终分析纳入49项研究。大多数关注居民健康(n = 40),并归类为个人层面的干预(n = 21)。大多数研究(n = 24)涉及普通外科手术。干预措施侧重于人体工程学、正念、减压、工作时间和健康计划。自2015年以来,健康领域已经从身体和职业领域转向主要是情感领域。结论:以情绪健康为目标的个人层面干预的流行反映了一种信念,即外科医生对自己的健康负责。迄今为止的研究主要集中在外科培训生身上,缺乏关于改善外科医生员工健康的措施的研究。缺乏具有客观结果测量的方法学上可靠的干预研究,需要促进对外科医生福祉共同承担组织责任的文化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of CJS is to contribute to the meaningful continuing medical education of Canadian surgical specialists, and to provide surgeons with an effective vehicle for the dissemination of observations in the areas of clinical and basic science research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信