Prognostic Significance of Venous-to-Arterial CO2 Difference in Critically Ill Patients After Major Abdominal Surgery.

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Gyeo Ra Lee, Eun Young Kim
{"title":"Prognostic Significance of Venous-to-Arterial CO<sub>2</sub> Difference in Critically Ill Patients After Major Abdominal Surgery.","authors":"Gyeo Ra Lee, Eun Young Kim","doi":"10.3390/biomedicines13092295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference [P(v-a)CO<sub>2</sub>] reflects the adequacy of tissue perfusion, with elevated values suggesting impaired clearance of CO<sub>2</sub>. While its prognostic role has been investigated in septic shock and high-risk surgery, evidence in postoperative critically ill patients remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of ΔP(v-a)CO<sub>2</sub> after major abdominal surgery and its relationship with microcirculatory markers. <b>Methods</b>: We retrospectively analyzed 86 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after major abdominal surgery between September 2020 and October 2023. Arterial and central venous blood gas analyses were performed immediately postoperatively and at 24 h. Patients were stratified into groups according to ΔP(v-a)CO<sub>2</sub> (≤ 0 vs. >0). Postoperative outcomes and correlations with central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO<sub>2</sub>) were assessed. <b>Results</b>: In the subgroup analysis of patients with an initial P(v-a)CO<sub>2</sub> > 6 mmHg, those in the ΔP(v-a)CO<sub>2</sub> > 0 group required mechanical ventilation (54.5% vs. 22.2%, <i>p = 0.033</i>) and continuous renal replacement therapy (36.4% vs. 8.9%, <i>p = 0.020</i>) more frequently, with longer durations of both interventions (<i>p = 0.011</i> and <i>p = 0.016</i>, respectively). ICU length of stay and the incidence of acute kidney injury were significantly lower in the ΔP(v-a)CO<sub>2</sub> ≤ 0 group. In addition, a modest negative correlation was observed between ScvO<sub>2</sub> measured at 24 h postoperatively and ΔP(v-a)CO<sub>2</sub>. <b>Conclusions</b>: ΔP(v-a)CO<sub>2</sub> may serve as a useful marker for postoperative risk stratification in critically ill patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. However, given the retrospective design, small sample size, and single-center setting, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in larger, prospective multicenter studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":8937,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicines","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12467732/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicines","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13092295","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The venous-to-arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure difference [P(v-a)CO2] reflects the adequacy of tissue perfusion, with elevated values suggesting impaired clearance of CO2. While its prognostic role has been investigated in septic shock and high-risk surgery, evidence in postoperative critically ill patients remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of ΔP(v-a)CO2 after major abdominal surgery and its relationship with microcirculatory markers. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 86 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after major abdominal surgery between September 2020 and October 2023. Arterial and central venous blood gas analyses were performed immediately postoperatively and at 24 h. Patients were stratified into groups according to ΔP(v-a)CO2 (≤ 0 vs. >0). Postoperative outcomes and correlations with central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO2) were assessed. Results: In the subgroup analysis of patients with an initial P(v-a)CO2 > 6 mmHg, those in the ΔP(v-a)CO2 > 0 group required mechanical ventilation (54.5% vs. 22.2%, p = 0.033) and continuous renal replacement therapy (36.4% vs. 8.9%, p = 0.020) more frequently, with longer durations of both interventions (p = 0.011 and p = 0.016, respectively). ICU length of stay and the incidence of acute kidney injury were significantly lower in the ΔP(v-a)CO2 ≤ 0 group. In addition, a modest negative correlation was observed between ScvO2 measured at 24 h postoperatively and ΔP(v-a)CO2. Conclusions: ΔP(v-a)CO2 may serve as a useful marker for postoperative risk stratification in critically ill patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. However, given the retrospective design, small sample size, and single-center setting, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in larger, prospective multicenter studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

危重病人腹大手术后静脉-动脉CO2差异的预后意义。
目的:静脉-动脉二氧化碳分压差[P(v-a)CO2]反映了组织灌注的充分性,其升高提示CO2清除受损。虽然其在感染性休克和高危手术中的预后作用已被研究,但在术后危重患者中的证据仍然有限。本研究旨在评价ΔP(v-a)CO2在腹部大手术后的预后价值及其与微循环指标的关系。方法:回顾性分析2020年9月至2023年10月期间86例腹部大手术后入住重症监护病房(ICU)的患者。术后立即和24 h进行动脉和中心静脉血气分析。根据ΔP(v-a)CO2(≤0 vs. >)将患者分层。评估术后预后及与中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO2)的相关性。结果:在初始P(v-a)CO2 > 6 mmHg患者的亚组分析中,ΔP(v-a)CO2 >组患者需要机械通气(54.5% vs. 22.2%, P = 0.033)和持续肾脏替代治疗(36.4% vs. 8.9%, P = 0.020)的频率更高,两种干预的持续时间更长(P = 0.011和P = 0.016)。ΔP(v-a)CO2≤0组患者ICU住院时间及急性肾损伤发生率均明显降低。此外,术后24 h ScvO2与ΔP(v-a)CO2之间存在适度的负相关。结论:ΔP(v-a)CO2可作为腹大手术危重患者术后危险分层的有效指标。然而,考虑到回顾性设计、小样本量和单中心设置,这些发现应该被认为是假设产生的,需要在更大的前瞻性多中心研究中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedicines
Biomedicines Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2823
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomedicines (ISSN 2227-9059; CODEN: BIOMID) is an international, scientific, open access journal on biomedicines published quarterly online by MDPI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信