Quantitative variation in the camptothecin produced by diverse endophytic microorganisms of Ophiorrhiza mungos L.

IF 2.5 3区 生物学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Mary Theresa, Arya Nikathil Pradeep, Aswani Ravi, Maya Mathew, Manjusha Premnath, Charuvila T Aravindakumar, Remakanthan Appukuttan, Indu C Nair, Linu Mathew, Sebastian Franz Bender, Marcel G A van der Heijden, Radhakrishnan Edayileveettil Krishnankutty
{"title":"Quantitative variation in the camptothecin produced by diverse endophytic microorganisms of Ophiorrhiza mungos L.","authors":"Mary Theresa, Arya Nikathil Pradeep, Aswani Ravi, Maya Mathew, Manjusha Premnath, Charuvila T Aravindakumar, Remakanthan Appukuttan, Indu C Nair, Linu Mathew, Sebastian Franz Bender, Marcel G A van der Heijden, Radhakrishnan Edayileveettil Krishnankutty","doi":"10.1002/btpr.70074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endophytic microorganisms (EMs) residing in medicinal plants form a promising resource of anticancer compounds such as camptothecin (CPT). Given the increasing therapeutic demand for CPT, its sustainable production is of high significance. This study has investigated the EMs isolated from different parts of Ophiorrhiza mungos for the CPT biosynthetic potential. Preliminary screening of EMs for the CPT synthesis was carried out by HPLC analysis of culture extracts, and the HPLC-positive extracts were further confirmed via LC-MS/MS. From a total of 175 EMs screened in the study, 17 strains (14 bacterial and 3 fungal) were found to be CPT producing, with most of them being sourced from the root tissues. Among the bacterial strains, Alcaligenes faecalis subsp. phenolicus S18 exhibited the highest CPT yield (1294.52 μg/L) followed by Bacillus tequilensis (309.02 μg/L). From the fungal strains, Aspergillus sp., S109, S42, and S111 yielded CPT of 22.07, 18.98, and 13.26 μg/L, respectively. Overall, CPT yield among the bacterial producers ranged from 1294.52 to 5.16 μg/L, predominantly from the Bacillus, Acinetobacter, Alcaligenes, and Pseudomonas genera. This study provides the first report on the CPT production by A. faecalis and Aspergillus sp. isolated from O. mungos, and also the first documentation of CPT synthesis in Stenotrophomonas, Fictibacillus, Acinetobacter, and Pseudomonas genera. These findings highlight the potential of novel microbial sources as high-yielding, reliable, and cost-effective alternatives to support commercial CPT production.</p>","PeriodicalId":8856,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology Progress","volume":" ","pages":"e70074"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology Progress","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/btpr.70074","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endophytic microorganisms (EMs) residing in medicinal plants form a promising resource of anticancer compounds such as camptothecin (CPT). Given the increasing therapeutic demand for CPT, its sustainable production is of high significance. This study has investigated the EMs isolated from different parts of Ophiorrhiza mungos for the CPT biosynthetic potential. Preliminary screening of EMs for the CPT synthesis was carried out by HPLC analysis of culture extracts, and the HPLC-positive extracts were further confirmed via LC-MS/MS. From a total of 175 EMs screened in the study, 17 strains (14 bacterial and 3 fungal) were found to be CPT producing, with most of them being sourced from the root tissues. Among the bacterial strains, Alcaligenes faecalis subsp. phenolicus S18 exhibited the highest CPT yield (1294.52 μg/L) followed by Bacillus tequilensis (309.02 μg/L). From the fungal strains, Aspergillus sp., S109, S42, and S111 yielded CPT of 22.07, 18.98, and 13.26 μg/L, respectively. Overall, CPT yield among the bacterial producers ranged from 1294.52 to 5.16 μg/L, predominantly from the Bacillus, Acinetobacter, Alcaligenes, and Pseudomonas genera. This study provides the first report on the CPT production by A. faecalis and Aspergillus sp. isolated from O. mungos, and also the first documentation of CPT synthesis in Stenotrophomonas, Fictibacillus, Acinetobacter, and Pseudomonas genera. These findings highlight the potential of novel microbial sources as high-yielding, reliable, and cost-effective alternatives to support commercial CPT production.

芒戈蛇根不同内生微生物产喜树碱的数量变异。
药用植物内生微生物(EMs)是喜树碱(CPT)等抗癌化合物的重要来源。鉴于对CPT的治疗需求不断增加,其可持续生产具有重要意义。本研究考察了从芒戈蛇根不同部位分离得到的EMs对CPT的生物合成潜力。通过对培养提取物的HPLC分析初步筛选CPT合成的EMs,并通过LC-MS/MS进一步确认HPLC阳性提取物。在研究中筛选的175个EMs中,发现17个菌株(14个细菌和3个真菌)产生CPT,其中大多数来自根组织。在菌株中,粪碱菌亚芽孢杆菌;苯酚S18的CPT产量最高(1294.52 μg/L),其次是龙舌兰芽孢杆菌(309.02 μg/L)。真菌中曲霉、S109、S42和S111的CPT分别为22.07、18.98和13.26 μg/L。CPT产率在1294.52 ~ 5.16 μg/L之间,主要产自芽孢杆菌属、不动杆菌属、碱性菌属和假单胞菌属。本研究首次报道了从芒果孤芽胞杆菌中分离的粪芽胞杆菌和曲霉菌产CPT,也首次记录了窄养单胞菌、芽胞杆菌、不动杆菌和假单胞菌属合成CPT。这些发现突出了新型微生物源作为高产、可靠和具有成本效益的替代品支持CPT商业化生产的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biotechnology Progress
Biotechnology Progress 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.40%
发文量
83
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: Biotechnology Progress , an official, bimonthly publication of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers and its technological community, the Society for Biological Engineering, features peer-reviewed research articles, reviews, and descriptions of emerging techniques for the development and design of new processes, products, and devices for the biotechnology, biopharmaceutical and bioprocess industries. Widespread interest includes application of biological and engineering principles in fields such as applied cellular physiology and metabolic engineering, biocatalysis and bioreactor design, bioseparations and downstream processing, cell culture and tissue engineering, biosensors and process control, bioinformatics and systems biology, biomaterials and artificial organs, stem cell biology and genetics, and plant biology and food science. Manuscripts concerning the design of related processes, products, or devices are also encouraged. Four types of manuscripts are printed in the Journal: Research Papers, Topical or Review Papers, Letters to the Editor, and R & D Notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信