Innowave MTB/RIF/INH facilitates timely and accurate diagnosis of multiple-drug resistant tuberculosis as a near POCT technique: a multicenter prospective on-site performance evaluation study.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 MICROBIOLOGY
Fen Wang, Long Cai, Zhongfeng Cui, Guanglu Jiang, Hairong Huang
{"title":"Innowave MTB/RIF/INH facilitates timely and accurate diagnosis of multiple-drug resistant tuberculosis as a near POCT technique: a multicenter prospective on-site performance evaluation study.","authors":"Fen Wang, Long Cai, Zhongfeng Cui, Guanglu Jiang, Hairong Huang","doi":"10.1186/s12941-025-00822-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Many rifampicin (RIF)-resistant (RR) tuberculosis (TB) patients remain sensitive to isoniazid (INH), which challenges the strategy of using RR as an instant indicator of multiple-drug resistance tuberculosis (MDR-TB). A molecular test capable of concurrently detecting RIF and INH resistance is urgently needed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The performance of a novel rapid molecular test, Innowave MTB/RIF/INH (InnowaveDX) was evaluated prospectively in three tertiary hospitals. Its capability of detecting resistance to RIF and INH was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 767 pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients, InnowaveDX showed significantly higher sensitivity than the Xpert MTB/RIF assay (Cepheid, USA) (74.97% versus 68.18%; p = 0.003, χ<sup>2</sup> = 8.664). This difference was particularly notable in culture-negative PTB cases (52.73% versus 41.29%; p = 0.001, χ<sup>2</sup> = 10.565). Both tests demonstrated high specificity in 286 non-TB patients. The overall consistency in RIF susceptibility prediction between InnowaveDX and the Xpert assay was 97.3% (505/519). InnowaveDX identified 83.05% (98/118) of INH-resistant cases as predicted by phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) and 95.45% (105/110) by another molecular method (MeltPro, Zeesan, China) for INH resistance detection on isolates. In addition, InnowaveDX showed a 99.35% consistency (154/155) with katG, inhA, and ahpC sequencing on sputum samples. The consistency rate for MDR-TB prediction between InnowaveDX and pDST was 93.25% (332/356). The accuracy of using RR to predict MDR-TB varied between 64.1 and 80.5%, depending on the reference method.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>InnowaveDX is an easy, rapid, and sensitive molecular test for PTB diagnosis that can detect INH and RIF resistance within 3 h, facilitating MDR-TB diagnosis on the first day of hospital admission.</p>","PeriodicalId":8052,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials","volume":"24 1","pages":"52"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12465834/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12941-025-00822-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Many rifampicin (RIF)-resistant (RR) tuberculosis (TB) patients remain sensitive to isoniazid (INH), which challenges the strategy of using RR as an instant indicator of multiple-drug resistance tuberculosis (MDR-TB). A molecular test capable of concurrently detecting RIF and INH resistance is urgently needed.

Methods: The performance of a novel rapid molecular test, Innowave MTB/RIF/INH (InnowaveDX) was evaluated prospectively in three tertiary hospitals. Its capability of detecting resistance to RIF and INH was assessed.

Results: In 767 pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) patients, InnowaveDX showed significantly higher sensitivity than the Xpert MTB/RIF assay (Cepheid, USA) (74.97% versus 68.18%; p = 0.003, χ2 = 8.664). This difference was particularly notable in culture-negative PTB cases (52.73% versus 41.29%; p = 0.001, χ2 = 10.565). Both tests demonstrated high specificity in 286 non-TB patients. The overall consistency in RIF susceptibility prediction between InnowaveDX and the Xpert assay was 97.3% (505/519). InnowaveDX identified 83.05% (98/118) of INH-resistant cases as predicted by phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (pDST) and 95.45% (105/110) by another molecular method (MeltPro, Zeesan, China) for INH resistance detection on isolates. In addition, InnowaveDX showed a 99.35% consistency (154/155) with katG, inhA, and ahpC sequencing on sputum samples. The consistency rate for MDR-TB prediction between InnowaveDX and pDST was 93.25% (332/356). The accuracy of using RR to predict MDR-TB varied between 64.1 and 80.5%, depending on the reference method.

Conclusion: InnowaveDX is an easy, rapid, and sensitive molecular test for PTB diagnosis that can detect INH and RIF resistance within 3 h, facilitating MDR-TB diagnosis on the first day of hospital admission.

Innowave MTB/RIF/INH作为一种近POCT技术,有助于及时准确诊断耐多药结核病:一项多中心前瞻性现场性能评估研究。
背景:许多利福平(RIF)耐药(RR)结核病(TB)患者仍然对异烟肼(INH)敏感,这对将RR作为耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)的即时指标的策略提出了挑战。目前迫切需要一种能够同时检测RIF和INH耐药性的分子检测方法。方法:对新型快速分子检测试剂盒InnowaveDX (InnowaveDX)在三家三级医院的性能进行前瞻性评价。对其检测RIF和INH耐药性的能力进行了评估。结果:在767例肺结核(PTB)患者中,InnowaveDX检测的敏感性显著高于Xpert MTB/RIF检测(美国造父岛)(74.97%比68.18%;p = 0.003, χ2 = 8.664)。这种差异在培养阴性肺结核患者中尤为显著(52.73% vs 41.29%; p = 0.001, χ2 = 10.565)。两种检测在286例非结核病患者中均显示出高特异性。InnowaveDX和Xpert法在RIF敏感性预测上的总体一致性为97.3%(505/519)。InnowaveDX检测表型药敏试验(pDST)预测的耐药病例为83.05%(98/118),另一种分子方法(MeltPro, Zeesan, China)检测的耐药病例为95.45%(105/110)。此外,在痰样本上,InnowaveDX与katG、inhA和ahpC测序的一致性为99.35%(154/155)。InnowaveDX与pDST预测耐多药结核病的符合率为93.25%(332/356)。根据参考方法的不同,使用RR预测耐多药结核病的准确度在64.1 ~ 80.5%之间。结论:InnowaveDX是一种简便、快速、灵敏的PTB诊断分子检测方法,可在3 h内检测出INH和RIF耐药,便于在入院第一天诊断出MDR-TB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials considers good quality, novel and international research of more than regional relevance. Research must include epidemiological and/or clinical information about isolates, and the journal covers the clinical microbiology of bacteria, viruses and fungi, as well as antimicrobial treatment of infectious diseases. Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials is an open access, peer-reviewed journal focusing on information concerning clinical microbiology, infectious diseases and antimicrobials. The management of infectious disease is dependent on correct diagnosis and appropriate antimicrobial treatment, and with this in mind, the journal aims to improve the communication between laboratory and clinical science in the field of clinical microbiology and antimicrobial treatment. Furthermore, the journal has no restrictions on space or access; this ensures that the journal can reach the widest possible audience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信