The Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Cohort Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Koji Fukata, Atsushi Ogura, Yuki Murata, Ryutaro Kobayashi, Shoji Kawakatsu, Shizuki Sugita, Shunsuke Onoe, Kazushi Miyata, Junpei Yamaguchi, Takashi Mizuno, Tomoki Ebata
{"title":"The Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Propensity Score Matching Cohort Study.","authors":"Koji Fukata, Atsushi Ogura, Yuki Murata, Ryutaro Kobayashi, Shoji Kawakatsu, Shizuki Sugita, Shunsuke Onoe, Kazushi Miyata, Junpei Yamaguchi, Takashi Mizuno, Tomoki Ebata","doi":"10.21873/anticanres.17791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Total neoadjuvant therapy has been widespread over the past years and the multimodal treatment strategy involving administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) gradually increases for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. However, the necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) following NAC remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of AC on survival outcomes and the influence of perioperative chemotherapy on treatment efficacy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who received NAC followed by surgery.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 107 patients with LARC who received NAC using propensity score matching (PSM) with covariates of clinical N stage, anus-preserving status, presence of severe complications (≥ Clavien-Dindo 3). All patients were planned and treated for three months with oxaliplatin-based doublet chemotherapy preoperatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences between AC and Non-AC groups in 50 patients of the PSM cohort. At a median follow-up of 85.6 months, the 5-year overall survival was 88.0% and the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 81.3% for the entire cohort. The 5-year RFS was significantly better in the AC than in the non-AC group (87.3% <i>vs.</i> 79.8%, <i>p</i>=0.033). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that non-AC and lateral lymph node metastasis were poor prognostic factors of RFS in patients with LARC [non-AC: Hazard ratio (HR)=4.089, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.217-13.735, <i>p</i>=0.023; lateral lymph node metastasis: HR=9.04, 95%CI=1.737-47.040, <i>p</i>=0.009].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>AC could improve RFS in patients with LARC following NAC.</p>","PeriodicalId":8072,"journal":{"name":"Anticancer research","volume":"45 10","pages":"4431-4439"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anticancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17791","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aim: Total neoadjuvant therapy has been widespread over the past years and the multimodal treatment strategy involving administration of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) gradually increases for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. However, the necessity of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) following NAC remains controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of AC on survival outcomes and the influence of perioperative chemotherapy on treatment efficacy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who received NAC followed by surgery.

Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed 107 patients with LARC who received NAC using propensity score matching (PSM) with covariates of clinical N stage, anus-preserving status, presence of severe complications (≥ Clavien-Dindo 3). All patients were planned and treated for three months with oxaliplatin-based doublet chemotherapy preoperatively.

Results: There were no significant differences between AC and Non-AC groups in 50 patients of the PSM cohort. At a median follow-up of 85.6 months, the 5-year overall survival was 88.0% and the 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) was 81.3% for the entire cohort. The 5-year RFS was significantly better in the AC than in the non-AC group (87.3% vs. 79.8%, p=0.033). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that non-AC and lateral lymph node metastasis were poor prognostic factors of RFS in patients with LARC [non-AC: Hazard ratio (HR)=4.089, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.217-13.735, p=0.023; lateral lymph node metastasis: HR=9.04, 95%CI=1.737-47.040, p=0.009].

Conclusion: AC could improve RFS in patients with LARC following NAC.

辅助化疗对局部晚期直肠癌患者新辅助化疗后的影响:倾向评分匹配队列研究。
背景/目的:在过去的几年里,全新辅助治疗已经被广泛应用,包括新辅助化疗(NAC)在内的多模式治疗策略在局部晚期直肠癌患者中逐渐增加。然而,NAC后是否需要辅助化疗(AC)仍存在争议。本研究旨在探讨局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)术后行NAC的患者,AC对生存结局的影响以及围手术期化疗对治疗效果的影响。患者和方法:我们回顾性分析了107例接受NAC治疗的LARC患者,采用倾向评分匹配(PSM),共变量为临床N分期、肛门保存状态、是否存在严重并发症(≥Clavien-Dindo 3)。所有患者术前计划并接受基于奥沙利铂的双重化疗3个月。结果:50例PSM患者AC组与非AC组之间无显著差异。在中位随访85.6个月时,整个队列的5年总生存率为88.0%,5年无复发生存率(RFS)为81.3%。AC组的5年RFS明显优于非AC组(87.3% vs. 79.8%, p=0.033)。多因素分析显示,非ac和侧淋巴结转移是LARC患者RFS的不良预后因素[非ac:风险比(HR)=4.089, 95%可信区间(CI)=1.217-13.735, p=0.023;侧淋巴结转移:HR=9.04, 95%CI=1.737 ~ 47.040, p=0.009。结论:AC可改善NAC后LARC患者的RFS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anticancer research
Anticancer research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
566
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANTICANCER RESEARCH is an independent international peer-reviewed journal devoted to the rapid publication of high quality original articles and reviews on all aspects of experimental and clinical oncology. Prompt evaluation of all submitted articles in confidence and rapid publication within 1-2 months of acceptance are guaranteed. ANTICANCER RESEARCH was established in 1981 and is published monthly (bimonthly until the end of 2008). Each annual volume contains twelve issues and index. Each issue may be divided into three parts (A: Reviews, B: Experimental studies, and C: Clinical and Epidemiological studies). Special issues, presenting the proceedings of meetings or groups of papers on topics of significant progress, will also be included in each volume. There is no limitation to the number of pages per issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信