Intradialytic Exercise Interventions to Enhance Physical Activity Levels in Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Siran Zhao, Gaoting Zhong, Aili Lv, Yuxiu Tao, Hongbao Liu, Honghong Lv, Zhonghui Zhai, Yang Li, Yan Hua, Yanqing Kang, Ya Zhang, Mei Huang, Chunping Ni
{"title":"Intradialytic Exercise Interventions to Enhance Physical Activity Levels in Hemodialysis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Siran Zhao, Gaoting Zhong, Aili Lv, Yuxiu Tao, Hongbao Liu, Honghong Lv, Zhonghui Zhai, Yang Li, Yan Hua, Yanqing Kang, Ya Zhang, Mei Huang, Chunping Ni","doi":"10.1159/000548114","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Physical activity levels in hemodialysis patients are low and continue to decline, increasing mortality risk. Intradialytic exercise improves hemodialysis patients' quality of life and enhances their physical and psychological health. But, existing reviews fail to provide the best evidence for enhancing physical activity levels in this population. This study is to examine the efficacy and safety of intradialytic exercise for hemodialysis patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, Wan Fang data, and SinoMed were searched up to March 2025. The reference lists of eligible studies were systematically checked to ensure comprehensive coverage of the relevant literature. Two independent reviewers searched the databases, selected trials, conducted a bias assessment, and extracted the data. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager Version 5.4.1.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 3880 studies that were screened, 23 studies involving 1114 patients were identified. Three types of exercise, seven exercise durations, and four exercise intensity standards were compared, and physical activity level, VO2 peak, muscle strength, and muscle mass were reported. Statistically, in terms of exercise type, combined aerobic and resistance exercise improved physical activity levels (SMD=0.99, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.55) and VO2 peak (SMD=1.01, 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.46). Meanwhile, resistance exercise significantly improved muscle strength (SMD=0.52, 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.81). In terms of exercise intensity, moderate exercise intensity significantly improved Physical activity levels (SMD=0.55, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.88), VO2 peak (SMD=0.59, 95% CI: 0.12 to 1.07), and muscle strength (SMD=0.37, 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.63). Additionally, higher-intensity exercise also significantly improved muscle strength (SMD=1.02, 95% CI: 0.51 to 1.53). As for exercise duration, programs lasting up to 3 months positively impacted Physical activity levels (SMD = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.17 to 1.13) and VO2 peak (SMD = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.19 to 1.21). Furthermore, exercise extending up to 6 months significantly improved muscle strength in hemodialysis patients (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.64).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Evidence shows that intradialytic exercise intervention improves physical activity levels, VO2 peak, and muscle strength in hemodialysis patients. Future clinical intervention studies could conduct direct comparisons of protocols with different exercise modalities, intensities, and durations.</p>","PeriodicalId":7570,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"1-35"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548114","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Physical activity levels in hemodialysis patients are low and continue to decline, increasing mortality risk. Intradialytic exercise improves hemodialysis patients' quality of life and enhances their physical and psychological health. But, existing reviews fail to provide the best evidence for enhancing physical activity levels in this population. This study is to examine the efficacy and safety of intradialytic exercise for hemodialysis patients.

Methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library CINAHL, Web of Science, PubMed, Wan Fang data, and SinoMed were searched up to March 2025. The reference lists of eligible studies were systematically checked to ensure comprehensive coverage of the relevant literature. Two independent reviewers searched the databases, selected trials, conducted a bias assessment, and extracted the data. Meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager Version 5.4.1.

Results: Of the 3880 studies that were screened, 23 studies involving 1114 patients were identified. Three types of exercise, seven exercise durations, and four exercise intensity standards were compared, and physical activity level, VO2 peak, muscle strength, and muscle mass were reported. Statistically, in terms of exercise type, combined aerobic and resistance exercise improved physical activity levels (SMD=0.99, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.55) and VO2 peak (SMD=1.01, 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.46). Meanwhile, resistance exercise significantly improved muscle strength (SMD=0.52, 95% CI: 0.24 to 0.81). In terms of exercise intensity, moderate exercise intensity significantly improved Physical activity levels (SMD=0.55, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.88), VO2 peak (SMD=0.59, 95% CI: 0.12 to 1.07), and muscle strength (SMD=0.37, 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.63). Additionally, higher-intensity exercise also significantly improved muscle strength (SMD=1.02, 95% CI: 0.51 to 1.53). As for exercise duration, programs lasting up to 3 months positively impacted Physical activity levels (SMD = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.17 to 1.13) and VO2 peak (SMD = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.19 to 1.21). Furthermore, exercise extending up to 6 months significantly improved muscle strength in hemodialysis patients (SMD = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.64).

Conclusion: Evidence shows that intradialytic exercise intervention improves physical activity levels, VO2 peak, and muscle strength in hemodialysis patients. Future clinical intervention studies could conduct direct comparisons of protocols with different exercise modalities, intensities, and durations.

透析期运动干预提高血液透析患者身体活动水平:系统回顾和荟萃分析
血液透析患者的身体活动水平较低且持续下降,增加了死亡风险。分析内运动可改善血液透析患者的生活质量,增强其身心健康。但是,现有的评论并没有为提高这一人群的体育活动水平提供最好的证据。本研究旨在探讨血液透析患者进行透析内运动的有效性和安全性。方法:检索截至2025年3月的MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane Library CINAHL、Web of Science、PubMed、万方数据和中国医学信息数据库。系统地检查了符合条件的研究的参考文献列表,以确保相关文献的全面覆盖。两名独立审稿人检索了数据库,选择了试验,进行了偏倚评估,并提取了数据。meta分析使用Review Manager Version 5.4.1进行。结果:在筛选的3880项研究中,确定了23项研究,涉及1114例患者。比较三种运动类型、七种运动持续时间和四种运动强度标准,并报告身体活动水平、VO2峰值、肌肉力量和肌肉质量。统计上,在运动类型方面,有氧和阻力联合运动改善了身体活动水平(SMD=0.99, 95% CI: 0.44 ~ 1.55)和VO2峰值(SMD=1.01, 95% CI: 0.56 ~ 1.46)。同时,抗阻运动显著提高肌力(SMD=0.52, 95% CI: 0.24 ~ 0.81)。在运动强度方面,中等运动强度显著改善了身体活动水平(SMD=0.55, 95% CI: 0.22 ~ 0.88)、VO2峰值(SMD=0.59, 95% CI: 0.12 ~ 1.07)和肌肉力量(SMD=0.37, 95% CI: 0.11 ~ 0.63)。此外,高强度运动也显著改善肌肉力量(SMD=1.02, 95% CI: 0.51 ~ 1.53)。至于运动时间,持续3个月的项目对身体活动水平(SMD = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.17至1.13)和VO2峰值(SMD = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.19至1.21)有积极影响。此外,长达6个月的运动可显著改善血液透析患者的肌肉力量(SMD = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.18至0.64)。结论:有证据表明,运动干预可以改善血液透析患者的身体活动水平、VO2峰值和肌肉力量。未来的临床干预研究可以直接比较不同运动方式、强度和持续时间的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Nephrology
American Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
74
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The ''American Journal of Nephrology'' is a peer-reviewed journal that focuses on timely topics in both basic science and clinical research. Papers are divided into several sections, including:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信