Andreas Gericke, Karoline Morling, Ingo Haag, Micha Gebel, Julia Krumm, Georges Bruns, Justus E. E. van Beusekom, Stephan Fuchs, Wera Leujak
{"title":"Are historical conditions reference conditions? Revising the modeled riverine nutrient input into the German North Sea and Baltic Sea around 1880","authors":"Andreas Gericke, Karoline Morling, Ingo Haag, Micha Gebel, Julia Krumm, Georges Bruns, Justus E. E. van Beusekom, Stephan Fuchs, Wera Leujak","doi":"10.1186/s12302-025-01185-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The German legislation sets two targets for riverine nitrogen concentrations in North Sea and Baltic Sea tributaries as well as river type-specific phosphorus thresholds. The current target for the Baltic Sea as well as the thresholds for the good status were derived from modeled riverine and atmospheric inputs around 1880. However, the calculated nitrogen balance differed between the model applications for the German North Sea and Baltic Sea. Existing nitrogen targets for North Sea tributaries are likely insufficient for environmental objectives according to recent model and data analyses. We used a harmonized approach to model nutrient inputs to the German Seas around 1880 and discuss these outcomes in the context of stricter requirements needed for ecological objectives in the North Sea.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>For river basins entering the German North Sea and Baltic Sea, we modeled emissions, concentrations, and loads of total nitrogen and total phosphorus around 1880. The historical riverine inputs to the North Sea were 180 kt N yr<sup>−1</sup> and 4.20 kt P yr<sup>−1</sup> and to the Baltic Sea 22 kt N yr<sup>−1</sup> and 0.45 kt P yr<sup>−1</sup>, respectively. These loads corresponded to annual mean concentrations of 1.36 mg N l<sup>−1</sup> and 0.032 mg P l<sup>−1</sup> (North Sea) as well as 1.11 mg N l<sup>−1</sup> and 0.022 mg P l<sup>−1</sup> (Baltic Sea). Modeled nitrogen concentrations at river mouths were lower than the previous German model results but exceeded published reference concentrations. They were, however, partly in agreement with ecology-based concentrations for major North Sea tributaries based on published reduction needs.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The modeled nutrient concentrations at river mouths confirm the inconsistency of German model applications with regional applications. For the North Sea, they support a more stringent basin-wide nitrogen target and thresholds for the good status of coastal and marine waters. As the historical conditions exceeded reference conditions, the offset of 50% to the historical concentration for the good ecological status should be revised for both sea basins. According to ecology-based target concentrations, only + 30% may be acceptable for North Sea tributaries, corresponding to 1.8 mg N l<sup>−1</sup>. Any revision of the German legislation should acknowledge the inherent uncertainties.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":546,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-025-01185-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-025-01185-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
The German legislation sets two targets for riverine nitrogen concentrations in North Sea and Baltic Sea tributaries as well as river type-specific phosphorus thresholds. The current target for the Baltic Sea as well as the thresholds for the good status were derived from modeled riverine and atmospheric inputs around 1880. However, the calculated nitrogen balance differed between the model applications for the German North Sea and Baltic Sea. Existing nitrogen targets for North Sea tributaries are likely insufficient for environmental objectives according to recent model and data analyses. We used a harmonized approach to model nutrient inputs to the German Seas around 1880 and discuss these outcomes in the context of stricter requirements needed for ecological objectives in the North Sea.
Results
For river basins entering the German North Sea and Baltic Sea, we modeled emissions, concentrations, and loads of total nitrogen and total phosphorus around 1880. The historical riverine inputs to the North Sea were 180 kt N yr−1 and 4.20 kt P yr−1 and to the Baltic Sea 22 kt N yr−1 and 0.45 kt P yr−1, respectively. These loads corresponded to annual mean concentrations of 1.36 mg N l−1 and 0.032 mg P l−1 (North Sea) as well as 1.11 mg N l−1 and 0.022 mg P l−1 (Baltic Sea). Modeled nitrogen concentrations at river mouths were lower than the previous German model results but exceeded published reference concentrations. They were, however, partly in agreement with ecology-based concentrations for major North Sea tributaries based on published reduction needs.
Conclusions
The modeled nutrient concentrations at river mouths confirm the inconsistency of German model applications with regional applications. For the North Sea, they support a more stringent basin-wide nitrogen target and thresholds for the good status of coastal and marine waters. As the historical conditions exceeded reference conditions, the offset of 50% to the historical concentration for the good ecological status should be revised for both sea basins. According to ecology-based target concentrations, only + 30% may be acceptable for North Sea tributaries, corresponding to 1.8 mg N l−1. Any revision of the German legislation should acknowledge the inherent uncertainties.
德国立法为北海和波罗的海支流的河流氮浓度以及河流特定类型的磷阈值设定了两个目标。波罗的海目前的目标以及良好状态的阈值是根据1880年左右模拟的河流和大气输入得出的。然而,德国北海和波罗的海的模式应用计算出的氮平衡不同。根据最近的模型和数据分析,北海支流现有的氮目标可能不足以实现环境目标。我们使用了一种统一的方法来模拟1880年左右德国海的营养输入,并在北海生态目标需要更严格要求的背景下讨论这些结果。对于进入德国北海和波罗的海的河流流域,我们模拟了1880年前后总氮和总磷的排放、浓度和负荷。历史上流入北海的河流分别为180 kt N yr - 1和4.20 kt P yr - 1,流入波罗的海的河流分别为22 kt N yr - 1和0.45 kt P yr - 1。这些负荷对应于年平均浓度为1.36 mg N - 1和0.032 mg P - 1(北海)以及1.11 mg N - 1和0.022 mg P - 1(波罗的海)。模拟的河口氮浓度低于先前德国模型的结果,但超过了公布的参考浓度。然而,根据已公布的减排需求,它们与北海主要支流的生态浓度部分一致。结论模拟的河口营养物浓度证实了德国模式应用与区域应用的不一致性。对于北海,他们支持更严格的全盆地氮目标和阈值,以保持沿海和海洋水域的良好状态。由于历史条件超过参考条件,两个海盆生态状况良好时对历史浓度50%的偏移量应进行修正。根据基于生态学的目标浓度,北海支流只有+ 30%可接受,相当于1.8 mg N l−1。对德国立法的任何修订都应承认其固有的不确定性。
期刊介绍:
ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation.
ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation.
ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation.
Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues.
Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.