{"title":"The impact of graphene filler on the energy absorption of hybrid composite crash boxes","authors":"Baran Erkek, Ertan Kosedag, Hamit Adin","doi":"10.1007/s10999-024-09739-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>One of the safety components found in vehicles is crash boxes mounted on vehicle chassis. These boxes, when mounted on the vehicle chassis, are intended to preserve the integrity of vehicle and ensure safety of passengers inside during crashs. Since these crash boxes are generally made of metal, efforts are made to reduce the additional weight on vehicles. Therefore, like many other parts in vehicles, there is a tendency to move towards the use of composite materials in crash boxes. In our study, crash boxes with hybridization achieved by altering the winding sequences of glass, aramid, and carbon fibers, with addition of graphene, were experimentally compared in terms of maximum peak forces, energy absorption, and specific energy absorption. Samples were produced with 0.25% graphene addition, with glass fiber G0.25 g, aramid fiber A0.25 g, and carbon fiber C0.25 g, and in hybridization, winding sequences were internally aramid-carbon-glass ACG0.25 g, carbon-glass-aramid CGA0.25 g, and glass-aramid-carbon GAC0.25 g. Similarly, samples labeled G0.50 g-GAC0.50 g were produced with 0.50% graphene addition. As a result, the best maximum peak force and specific energy absorption were achieved with the 0.50% graphene-added C0.50 g, at 8.52 kN and 10.08 J/g respectively. While the best energy absorption was with C0.25 g at 228.25 J, the worst was with glass fiber G0.25 g at 21.78 J. The addition of graphene to A0.25 g and A0.50 g, namely the aramid fiber samples, significantly increased their values by forming a good structure.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":593,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design","volume":"21 2","pages":"339 - 355"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10999-024-09739-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
One of the safety components found in vehicles is crash boxes mounted on vehicle chassis. These boxes, when mounted on the vehicle chassis, are intended to preserve the integrity of vehicle and ensure safety of passengers inside during crashs. Since these crash boxes are generally made of metal, efforts are made to reduce the additional weight on vehicles. Therefore, like many other parts in vehicles, there is a tendency to move towards the use of composite materials in crash boxes. In our study, crash boxes with hybridization achieved by altering the winding sequences of glass, aramid, and carbon fibers, with addition of graphene, were experimentally compared in terms of maximum peak forces, energy absorption, and specific energy absorption. Samples were produced with 0.25% graphene addition, with glass fiber G0.25 g, aramid fiber A0.25 g, and carbon fiber C0.25 g, and in hybridization, winding sequences were internally aramid-carbon-glass ACG0.25 g, carbon-glass-aramid CGA0.25 g, and glass-aramid-carbon GAC0.25 g. Similarly, samples labeled G0.50 g-GAC0.50 g were produced with 0.50% graphene addition. As a result, the best maximum peak force and specific energy absorption were achieved with the 0.50% graphene-added C0.50 g, at 8.52 kN and 10.08 J/g respectively. While the best energy absorption was with C0.25 g at 228.25 J, the worst was with glass fiber G0.25 g at 21.78 J. The addition of graphene to A0.25 g and A0.50 g, namely the aramid fiber samples, significantly increased their values by forming a good structure.
期刊介绍:
It is the objective of this journal to provide an effective medium for the dissemination of recent advances and original works in mechanics and materials'' engineering and their impact on the design process in an integrated, highly focused and coherent format. The goal is to enable mechanical, aeronautical, civil, automotive, biomedical, chemical and nuclear engineers, researchers and scientists to keep abreast of recent developments and exchange ideas on a number of topics relating to the use of mechanics and materials in design.
Analytical synopsis of contents:
The following non-exhaustive list is considered to be within the scope of the International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design:
Intelligent Design:
Nano-engineering and Nano-science in Design;
Smart Materials and Adaptive Structures in Design;
Mechanism(s) Design;
Design against Failure;
Design for Manufacturing;
Design of Ultralight Structures;
Design for a Clean Environment;
Impact and Crashworthiness;
Microelectronic Packaging Systems.
Advanced Materials in Design:
Newly Engineered Materials;
Smart Materials and Adaptive Structures;
Micromechanical Modelling of Composites;
Damage Characterisation of Advanced/Traditional Materials;
Alternative Use of Traditional Materials in Design;
Functionally Graded Materials;
Failure Analysis: Fatigue and Fracture;
Multiscale Modelling Concepts and Methodology;
Interfaces, interfacial properties and characterisation.
Design Analysis and Optimisation:
Shape and Topology Optimisation;
Structural Optimisation;
Optimisation Algorithms in Design;
Nonlinear Mechanics in Design;
Novel Numerical Tools in Design;
Geometric Modelling and CAD Tools in Design;
FEM, BEM and Hybrid Methods;
Integrated Computer Aided Design;
Computational Failure Analysis;
Coupled Thermo-Electro-Mechanical Designs.