Biodiversity and ecosystem services of cacao agroforestry arrangements in the Colombian Amazon

IF 2.2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Juliana Andrea Solarte-Soto, Fabiola Ospina-Bautista, Tobias Fremout, William Felipe Melo-Zipacon, Manuel C. Valencia-Molina, Mirjam Pulleman
{"title":"Biodiversity and ecosystem services of cacao agroforestry arrangements in the Colombian Amazon","authors":"Juliana Andrea Solarte-Soto,&nbsp;Fabiola Ospina-Bautista,&nbsp;Tobias Fremout,&nbsp;William Felipe Melo-Zipacon,&nbsp;Manuel C. Valencia-Molina,&nbsp;Mirjam Pulleman","doi":"10.1007/s10457-025-01326-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cacao agroforestry systems (AFS) represent a more sustainable alternative to monocultures by providing significant benefits in terms of carbon stocks and biodiversity conservation. For their adoption, farmers must make key decisions regarding the tree species to integrate and the type of spatial arrangement to implement. This study aimed to evaluate how tree diversity in AFS influences the provision of ecosystem services (ES), as well as the potential synergies and trade-offs among them, in the southern Colombian Amazon region. We analyzed three AFS arrangements, scattered trees, live fences, and alley cropping, and four ES (aboveground carbon stocks, and provision of cacao, timber and fruit). Thirty farms were sampled using variable-area transects to record tree composition and density. Carbon stocks were estimated using an allometric equation, cacao yields were reported by farmers, and timber and fruit provision were indirectly quantified through the basal area of fruit and timber trees. A total of 121 tree species were identified, mostly native species. Although tree diversity and density did not vary significantly among AFS arrangements, composition differed. Significant synergies were detected between regulating ES (aboveground carbon stocks) and provisioning ES (timber provision), both of which were associated with tree species richness and density. In contrast, no statistically significant trade-offs were found between cacao yields and other ES. In conclusion, diverse AFS can sustain multiple ES, but require careful planning and incentives that recognize their value in terms of ecosystem service delivery and biodiversity conservation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"99 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01326-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cacao agroforestry systems (AFS) represent a more sustainable alternative to monocultures by providing significant benefits in terms of carbon stocks and biodiversity conservation. For their adoption, farmers must make key decisions regarding the tree species to integrate and the type of spatial arrangement to implement. This study aimed to evaluate how tree diversity in AFS influences the provision of ecosystem services (ES), as well as the potential synergies and trade-offs among them, in the southern Colombian Amazon region. We analyzed three AFS arrangements, scattered trees, live fences, and alley cropping, and four ES (aboveground carbon stocks, and provision of cacao, timber and fruit). Thirty farms were sampled using variable-area transects to record tree composition and density. Carbon stocks were estimated using an allometric equation, cacao yields were reported by farmers, and timber and fruit provision were indirectly quantified through the basal area of fruit and timber trees. A total of 121 tree species were identified, mostly native species. Although tree diversity and density did not vary significantly among AFS arrangements, composition differed. Significant synergies were detected between regulating ES (aboveground carbon stocks) and provisioning ES (timber provision), both of which were associated with tree species richness and density. In contrast, no statistically significant trade-offs were found between cacao yields and other ES. In conclusion, diverse AFS can sustain multiple ES, but require careful planning and incentives that recognize their value in terms of ecosystem service delivery and biodiversity conservation.

哥伦比亚亚马逊地区可可农林业安排的生物多样性和生态系统服务
可可农林复合系统(AFS)通过在碳储量和生物多样性保护方面提供显着效益,代表了单一栽培的更可持续的替代方案。为了采用它们,农民必须就要整合的树种和要实施的空间安排类型做出关键决定。本研究旨在评估哥伦比亚南部亚马逊地区AFS树木多样性如何影响生态系统服务(ES)的提供,以及它们之间潜在的协同效应和权衡。我们分析了三种AFS安排,分散树木,活围栏和小巷种植,以及四种ES(地上碳储量,可可,木材和水果的供应)。采用变面积样带对30个农场进行取样,记录树木组成和密度。碳储量利用异速生长方程估算,可可产量由农民报告,木材和果实供应通过果树和木材的基底面积间接量化。共鉴定树种121种,以本地种居多。不同树种间树木多样性和密度差异不显著,但组成差异较大。在调节ES(地上碳储量)和供应ES(木材供应)之间发现了显著的协同效应,两者都与树种丰富度和密度有关。相比之下,在可可产量和其他ES之间没有发现统计学上显著的权衡。总之,多样化的AFS可以维持多种生态系统,但需要仔细的规划和激励措施,以认识其在生态系统服务提供和生物多样性保护方面的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信