Juliana Andrea Solarte-Soto, Fabiola Ospina-Bautista, Tobias Fremout, William Felipe Melo-Zipacon, Manuel C. Valencia-Molina, Mirjam Pulleman
{"title":"Biodiversity and ecosystem services of cacao agroforestry arrangements in the Colombian Amazon","authors":"Juliana Andrea Solarte-Soto, Fabiola Ospina-Bautista, Tobias Fremout, William Felipe Melo-Zipacon, Manuel C. Valencia-Molina, Mirjam Pulleman","doi":"10.1007/s10457-025-01326-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cacao agroforestry systems (AFS) represent a more sustainable alternative to monocultures by providing significant benefits in terms of carbon stocks and biodiversity conservation. For their adoption, farmers must make key decisions regarding the tree species to integrate and the type of spatial arrangement to implement. This study aimed to evaluate how tree diversity in AFS influences the provision of ecosystem services (ES), as well as the potential synergies and trade-offs among them, in the southern Colombian Amazon region. We analyzed three AFS arrangements, scattered trees, live fences, and alley cropping, and four ES (aboveground carbon stocks, and provision of cacao, timber and fruit). Thirty farms were sampled using variable-area transects to record tree composition and density. Carbon stocks were estimated using an allometric equation, cacao yields were reported by farmers, and timber and fruit provision were indirectly quantified through the basal area of fruit and timber trees. A total of 121 tree species were identified, mostly native species. Although tree diversity and density did not vary significantly among AFS arrangements, composition differed. Significant synergies were detected between regulating ES (aboveground carbon stocks) and provisioning ES (timber provision), both of which were associated with tree species richness and density. In contrast, no statistically significant trade-offs were found between cacao yields and other ES. In conclusion, diverse AFS can sustain multiple ES, but require careful planning and incentives that recognize their value in terms of ecosystem service delivery and biodiversity conservation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":"99 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-025-01326-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cacao agroforestry systems (AFS) represent a more sustainable alternative to monocultures by providing significant benefits in terms of carbon stocks and biodiversity conservation. For their adoption, farmers must make key decisions regarding the tree species to integrate and the type of spatial arrangement to implement. This study aimed to evaluate how tree diversity in AFS influences the provision of ecosystem services (ES), as well as the potential synergies and trade-offs among them, in the southern Colombian Amazon region. We analyzed three AFS arrangements, scattered trees, live fences, and alley cropping, and four ES (aboveground carbon stocks, and provision of cacao, timber and fruit). Thirty farms were sampled using variable-area transects to record tree composition and density. Carbon stocks were estimated using an allometric equation, cacao yields were reported by farmers, and timber and fruit provision were indirectly quantified through the basal area of fruit and timber trees. A total of 121 tree species were identified, mostly native species. Although tree diversity and density did not vary significantly among AFS arrangements, composition differed. Significant synergies were detected between regulating ES (aboveground carbon stocks) and provisioning ES (timber provision), both of which were associated with tree species richness and density. In contrast, no statistically significant trade-offs were found between cacao yields and other ES. In conclusion, diverse AFS can sustain multiple ES, but require careful planning and incentives that recognize their value in terms of ecosystem service delivery and biodiversity conservation.
期刊介绍:
Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base