A Comparative Review of Fuzzy Reinforced Search Algorithms: Methods and Applications

IF 12.1 2区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Mahsa Moloodpoor, Ali Mortazavi
{"title":"A Comparative Review of Fuzzy Reinforced Search Algorithms: Methods and Applications","authors":"Mahsa Moloodpoor,&nbsp;Ali Mortazavi","doi":"10.1007/s11831-025-10259-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Engineering optimization provides efficient designs that balance performance with resource demand. Metaheuristic algorithms excel at this task, but their lack of adaptability across different problems limits their search capability. In this regard, integrating these methods with auxiliary decision-making mechanisms based on fuzzy logic can considerably improve their search ability. Fuzzy logic empowers these algorithms to adapt their search behavior dynamically based on specific problem characteristics. The current study assesses how this integration improves search efficiency and adaptability to complex and uncertain scenarios, ultimately leading to more effective solutions in engineering optimization. To this end, different fuzzy-reinforced metaheuristic approaches are evaluated, and their search capabilities are compared among themselves and against their standard versions. The selected methods were thoroughly assessed from diverse aspects, including search performance, behavioral process, computational cost, and stability across various problems (e.g., mathematical, mechanical, and structural problems). The acquired results are reported and discussed in detail. Consequently, the attained outcomes indicate that a proper fuzzy-based decision mechanism can considerably improve the search capability of metaheuristic algorithms.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55473,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering","volume":"32 6","pages":"3933 - 3977"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11831-025-10259-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11831-025-10259-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Engineering optimization provides efficient designs that balance performance with resource demand. Metaheuristic algorithms excel at this task, but their lack of adaptability across different problems limits their search capability. In this regard, integrating these methods with auxiliary decision-making mechanisms based on fuzzy logic can considerably improve their search ability. Fuzzy logic empowers these algorithms to adapt their search behavior dynamically based on specific problem characteristics. The current study assesses how this integration improves search efficiency and adaptability to complex and uncertain scenarios, ultimately leading to more effective solutions in engineering optimization. To this end, different fuzzy-reinforced metaheuristic approaches are evaluated, and their search capabilities are compared among themselves and against their standard versions. The selected methods were thoroughly assessed from diverse aspects, including search performance, behavioral process, computational cost, and stability across various problems (e.g., mathematical, mechanical, and structural problems). The acquired results are reported and discussed in detail. Consequently, the attained outcomes indicate that a proper fuzzy-based decision mechanism can considerably improve the search capability of metaheuristic algorithms.

模糊强化搜索算法的比较综述:方法与应用
工程优化提供了平衡性能与资源需求的有效设计。元启发式算法在这项任务中表现出色,但它们缺乏对不同问题的适应性,限制了它们的搜索能力。在这方面,将这些方法与基于模糊逻辑的辅助决策机制相结合,可以大大提高它们的搜索能力。模糊逻辑使这些算法能够根据特定的问题特征动态地调整其搜索行为。目前的研究评估了这种集成如何提高搜索效率和对复杂和不确定场景的适应性,最终在工程优化中产生更有效的解决方案。为此,评估了不同的模糊强化元启发式方法,并比较了它们之间以及它们的标准版本的搜索能力。所选择的方法从多个方面进行了全面评估,包括搜索性能、行为过程、计算成本和跨各种问题(例如,数学、机械和结构问题)的稳定性。报告并详细讨论了所得结果。结果表明,适当的模糊决策机制可以显著提高元启发式算法的搜索能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
19.80
自引率
4.10%
发文量
153
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering Aim and Scope: Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering serves as an active forum for disseminating research and advanced practices in computational engineering, particularly focusing on mechanics and related fields. The journal emphasizes extended state-of-the-art reviews in selected areas, a unique feature of its publication. Review Format: Reviews published in the journal offer: A survey of current literature Critical exposition of topics in their full complexity By organizing the information in this manner, readers can quickly grasp the focus, coverage, and unique features of the Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信