Influence of 3D-printed fiber geometry and content on the mechanical and fracture behavior of cemented sand

Q2 Engineering
Mohammad Hematibahar, Ali Hasanzadeh, Makhmud Kharun, Amir Ali Milani, Amir Bakhtiyari, Jonas Yoshiriro Namba, Carlos Humberto Martins
{"title":"Influence of 3D-printed fiber geometry and content on the mechanical and fracture behavior of cemented sand","authors":"Mohammad Hematibahar,&nbsp;Ali Hasanzadeh,&nbsp;Makhmud Kharun,&nbsp;Amir Ali Milani,&nbsp;Amir Bakhtiyari,&nbsp;Jonas Yoshiriro Namba,&nbsp;Carlos Humberto Martins","doi":"10.1007/s42107-025-01412-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study assessed the influence of geometry and dosage of 3D-printed PLA + fibers on the mechanical and fracture behavior of cemented sand stabilized with silica fume. Four fiber geometries—straight (S), enlarged-end (E), indented (I), and hooked-end (H)—were manufactured via Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) and incorporated into sand specimens stabilized with 7% Portland cement and 0.5% silica fume (by dry weight). After 42 days of curing, compressive strength, tensile strength, and flexural strength tests were conducted according to ASTM standards. The addition of 5% silica fume enhanced compressive strength by 15%, contributing to improved particle bonding and matrix cohesion. Moreover, the incorporation of 3D-printed fibers enhanced mechanical performance, with gains of up to 30% in compressive strength, 18% in tensile strength, and 25% in flexural strength compared to unreinforced specimens. The stiffness increased significantly with silica fume (E₅₀ = 285.7 MPa) and with indented 3D-printed fibers at 0.6% content (E₅₀ = 236.8 MPa), indicating the contribution of silica fume in refining the soil matrix and enhancing particle bonding through pozzolanic activity. Specimens with enlarged-end fibers (E) exhibited the best overall performance. The energy absorption capacity (EAC) increased by 45%, with values rising from 128.1 MJ/m<sup>3</sup> to 209.6 MJ/m<sup>3</sup> for specimens containing 0.6% fiber, indicating enhanced toughness and crack resistance. Failure mode analysis revealed a transition from brittle to more ductile and progressive behavior in fiber-reinforced composites. Statistical analyses confirmed the significance of these improvements. Overall, the study highlights the promising role of 3D-printed fibers combined with silica fume as a sustainable and effective reinforcement strategy for improving the strength, ductility, and durability of cemented soils in geotechnical and civil construction applications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 9","pages":"3969 - 3992"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-025-01412-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study assessed the influence of geometry and dosage of 3D-printed PLA + fibers on the mechanical and fracture behavior of cemented sand stabilized with silica fume. Four fiber geometries—straight (S), enlarged-end (E), indented (I), and hooked-end (H)—were manufactured via Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) and incorporated into sand specimens stabilized with 7% Portland cement and 0.5% silica fume (by dry weight). After 42 days of curing, compressive strength, tensile strength, and flexural strength tests were conducted according to ASTM standards. The addition of 5% silica fume enhanced compressive strength by 15%, contributing to improved particle bonding and matrix cohesion. Moreover, the incorporation of 3D-printed fibers enhanced mechanical performance, with gains of up to 30% in compressive strength, 18% in tensile strength, and 25% in flexural strength compared to unreinforced specimens. The stiffness increased significantly with silica fume (E₅₀ = 285.7 MPa) and with indented 3D-printed fibers at 0.6% content (E₅₀ = 236.8 MPa), indicating the contribution of silica fume in refining the soil matrix and enhancing particle bonding through pozzolanic activity. Specimens with enlarged-end fibers (E) exhibited the best overall performance. The energy absorption capacity (EAC) increased by 45%, with values rising from 128.1 MJ/m3 to 209.6 MJ/m3 for specimens containing 0.6% fiber, indicating enhanced toughness and crack resistance. Failure mode analysis revealed a transition from brittle to more ductile and progressive behavior in fiber-reinforced composites. Statistical analyses confirmed the significance of these improvements. Overall, the study highlights the promising role of 3D-printed fibers combined with silica fume as a sustainable and effective reinforcement strategy for improving the strength, ductility, and durability of cemented soils in geotechnical and civil construction applications.

3d打印纤维几何形状和含量对胶结砂力学和断裂行为的影响
本研究评估了3d打印PLA +纤维的几何形状和用量对硅灰稳定胶结砂力学和断裂行为的影响。通过熔融沉积模型(FDM)制造出四种纤维形状——直(S)、扩大端(E)、缩进端(I)和钩端(H),并将其放入用7%波特兰水泥和0.5%硅粉(按干重计)稳定的砂样中。养护42天后,按ASTM标准进行抗压强度、抗拉强度和抗折强度试验。添加5%硅粉可使抗压强度提高15%,有助于改善颗粒结合和基体凝聚力。此外,3d打印纤维的加入增强了机械性能,与未增强的样品相比,抗压强度提高了30%,抗拉强度提高了18%,抗折强度提高了25%。硅灰(E₅₀= 285.7 MPa)和含量为0.6% (E₅₀= 236.8 MPa)的缩进3d打印纤维的刚度显着增加,这表明硅灰在精炼土壤基质和通过火山灰活性增强颗粒结合方面的贡献。端部增大的纤维(E)表现出最好的综合性能。当纤维含量为0.6%时,材料的能量吸收能力(EAC)提高了45%,从128.1 MJ/m3增加到209.6 MJ/m3,韧性和抗裂能力得到了提高。失效模式分析揭示了纤维增强复合材料从脆性到延性的转变和渐进行为。统计分析证实了这些改进的重要性。总的来说,该研究强调了3d打印纤维与硅灰相结合的有希望的作用,作为一种可持续和有效的加固策略,可以提高岩土工程和民用建筑应用中胶结土的强度、延性和耐久性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信