Agroecology supports sustainable development in Africa. A review

IF 6.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Sidney Madsen, Rachel Bezner Kerr, Kintan Kamilia, Maria Fernanda Cevallos, Claire Bazille, Maria Luisa Paracchini, Alexander Wezel
{"title":"Agroecology supports sustainable development in Africa. A review","authors":"Sidney Madsen,&nbsp;Rachel Bezner Kerr,&nbsp;Kintan Kamilia,&nbsp;Maria Fernanda Cevallos,&nbsp;Claire Bazille,&nbsp;Maria Luisa Paracchini,&nbsp;Alexander Wezel","doi":"10.1007/s13593-024-00976-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In African countries with high levels of food insecurity, food system transitions are key avenues for sustainable development but could also lead to serious trade-offs, depending on factors such as climatic conditions and socio-economic context. Here we review evidence of agroecology’s impact on economic, social, environmental, and food security outcomes in 17 African countries with high food insecurity to assess how agroecology might contribute to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The major findings are as follows: (1) agroecological practices positively affected multiple SDGs across semi-arid, sub-humid and humid agro-climatic zones for 94% of outcomes measured; (2) agroecological practices positively influenced two or more SDGs at the same time in 79% of articles. Crop diversification and agroecosystem diversity, for example, simultaneously lowered production costs (SDG1) and boosted yields (SDG2) through better soil health or agroecosystem resilience to climate events (SDG13/15), while reducing agrochemical pollution (SDG6) and improving biodiversity (SDG15). (3) Trade-offs between SDGs were documented in 14% of papers, and a negative feedback was observed between SDG8 (economic growth) and SDG5 (gender equity), with women disproportionately affected by the labour requirements of agroecological practices. Results from the review suggest that practical implementation of agroecology has the potential to reinforce interdependencies between SDGs, recommending this approach as an integral component of food system transformations for sustainable development.</p>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"45 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-024-00976-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-024-00976-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In African countries with high levels of food insecurity, food system transitions are key avenues for sustainable development but could also lead to serious trade-offs, depending on factors such as climatic conditions and socio-economic context. Here we review evidence of agroecology’s impact on economic, social, environmental, and food security outcomes in 17 African countries with high food insecurity to assess how agroecology might contribute to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The major findings are as follows: (1) agroecological practices positively affected multiple SDGs across semi-arid, sub-humid and humid agro-climatic zones for 94% of outcomes measured; (2) agroecological practices positively influenced two or more SDGs at the same time in 79% of articles. Crop diversification and agroecosystem diversity, for example, simultaneously lowered production costs (SDG1) and boosted yields (SDG2) through better soil health or agroecosystem resilience to climate events (SDG13/15), while reducing agrochemical pollution (SDG6) and improving biodiversity (SDG15). (3) Trade-offs between SDGs were documented in 14% of papers, and a negative feedback was observed between SDG8 (economic growth) and SDG5 (gender equity), with women disproportionately affected by the labour requirements of agroecological practices. Results from the review suggest that practical implementation of agroecology has the potential to reinforce interdependencies between SDGs, recommending this approach as an integral component of food system transformations for sustainable development.

生态农业支持非洲的可持续发展。回顾
在粮食不安全程度很高的非洲国家,粮食系统转型是可持续发展的关键途径,但也可能导致严重的权衡,这取决于气候条件和社会经济背景等因素。本文回顾了17个粮食不安全状况严重的非洲国家的生态农业对经济、社会、环境和粮食安全结果影响的证据,以评估生态农业如何有助于实现可持续发展目标。主要发现如下:(1)农业生态实践对半干旱、半湿润和湿润农业气候带的多个可持续发展目标产生了积极影响,所测结果的94%;(2)在79%的文章中,农业生态实践同时对两个或多个可持续发展目标产生了积极影响。例如,作物多样化和农业生态系统多样性通过改善土壤健康或农业生态系统对气候事件的抵御能力(可持续发展目标13/15),同时降低了生产成本(可持续发展目标1)并提高了产量(可持续发展目标2),同时减少了农用化学品污染(可持续发展目标6)并改善了生物多样性(可持续发展目标15)。(3) 14%的论文记录了可持续发展目标之间的权衡,可持续发展目标8(经济增长)和可持续发展目标5(性别平等)之间存在负反馈,女性受到农业生态实践劳动力需求的不成比例的影响。审查结果表明,生态农业的实际实施有可能加强可持续发展目标之间的相互依存关系,建议将这种方法作为粮食系统转型促进可持续发展的一个组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信