Optimizing stiffener orientation in cold-formed shear panel dampers for enhanced ductility and energy dissipation

Q2 Engineering
Ahmed Elgammal, Yasmin Ali
{"title":"Optimizing stiffener orientation in cold-formed shear panel dampers for enhanced ductility and energy dissipation","authors":"Ahmed Elgammal,&nbsp;Yasmin Ali","doi":"10.1007/s42107-025-01398-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Shear panel dampers (SPDs) are essential passive energy dissipation devices in earthquake-resistant structures, designed to yield in shear before other primary members, thereby mitigating seismic damage. The hysteretic response of SPDs is significantly affected by stiffener configurations on their webs, which prevent shear buckling. This study investigates SPDs with three distinct stiffener orientations (transverse, longitudinal, and diagonal) to identify the optimal configuration for enhanced ductility and energy dissipation. A 3D finite element model was developed in ANSYS Workbench to analyze SPDs under lateral cyclic loading, incorporating geometric imperfections and material nonlinearity. The model was validated against experimental data, confirming its accuracy. Subsequently, 18 SPDs, fabricated from cold-formed steel and cold-formed stainless steel, were numerically analyzed to evaluate their hysteretic performance. Results indicate that both transversely stiffened (TSPDs) and longitudinally stiffened (LSPDs) SPDs exhibited more stable hysteretic responses than diagonally stiffened (DSPDs). While DSPDs showed higher initial shear capacity, they demonstrated diminished ductility and energy dissipation due to rapid strength deterioration. LSPDs consistently outperformed TSPDs in buckling resistance, deformation capacity, ductility, and overall energy dissipation. Based on these findings, preliminary predictive design formulae for cold-formed stainless steel LSPDs were derived, offering valuable insights for optimized design.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8513,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"26 9","pages":"3797 - 3820"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42107-025-01398-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shear panel dampers (SPDs) are essential passive energy dissipation devices in earthquake-resistant structures, designed to yield in shear before other primary members, thereby mitigating seismic damage. The hysteretic response of SPDs is significantly affected by stiffener configurations on their webs, which prevent shear buckling. This study investigates SPDs with three distinct stiffener orientations (transverse, longitudinal, and diagonal) to identify the optimal configuration for enhanced ductility and energy dissipation. A 3D finite element model was developed in ANSYS Workbench to analyze SPDs under lateral cyclic loading, incorporating geometric imperfections and material nonlinearity. The model was validated against experimental data, confirming its accuracy. Subsequently, 18 SPDs, fabricated from cold-formed steel and cold-formed stainless steel, were numerically analyzed to evaluate their hysteretic performance. Results indicate that both transversely stiffened (TSPDs) and longitudinally stiffened (LSPDs) SPDs exhibited more stable hysteretic responses than diagonally stiffened (DSPDs). While DSPDs showed higher initial shear capacity, they demonstrated diminished ductility and energy dissipation due to rapid strength deterioration. LSPDs consistently outperformed TSPDs in buckling resistance, deformation capacity, ductility, and overall energy dissipation. Based on these findings, preliminary predictive design formulae for cold-formed stainless steel LSPDs were derived, offering valuable insights for optimized design.

Abstract Image

优化冷弯剪力板阻尼器的加劲筋方向以增强延性和能量耗散
剪力板阻尼器(spd)是抗震结构中必不可少的被动消能装置,其设计目的是在其他主要构件之前屈服于剪力,从而减轻地震破坏。腹板加劲筋的配置对spd的滞回响应有显著影响,从而防止了spd的剪切屈曲。本研究研究了具有三种不同加劲肋方向(横向、纵向和对角线)的spd,以确定增强延性和能量耗散的最佳配置。在ANSYS Workbench中建立了考虑几何缺陷和材料非线性的spd横向循环加载三维有限元模型。通过实验数据对模型进行了验证,验证了模型的准确性。随后,对18种由冷弯型钢和冷弯不锈钢制成的spd进行了滞回性能数值分析。结果表明,横向加筋(TSPDs)和纵向加筋(LSPDs)均表现出比斜向加筋(DSPDs)更稳定的滞回响应。虽然dspd具有较高的初始抗剪能力,但由于强度的快速劣化,其延性和能量耗散减弱。lspd在抗屈曲能力、变形能力、延展性和整体能量耗散方面一直优于tspd。基于这些发现,推导了冷弯不锈钢lspd的初步预测设计公式,为优化设计提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering
Asian Journal of Civil Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) welcomes articles and research contributions on topics such as:- Structural analysis and design - Earthquake and structural engineering - New building materials and concrete technology - Sustainable building and energy conservation - Housing and planning - Construction management - Optimal design of structuresPlease note that the journal will not accept papers in the area of hydraulic or geotechnical engineering, traffic/transportation or road making engineering, and on materials relevant to non-structural buildings, e.g. materials for road making and asphalt.  Although the journal will publish authoritative papers on theoretical and experimental research works and advanced applications, it may also feature, when appropriate:  a) tutorial survey type papers reviewing some fields of civil engineering; b) short communications and research notes; c) book reviews and conference announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信