Assessment of permaculture integration into gray and mainstream scientific literature in four languages. A review

IF 6.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Roberto Carlos Forte Taylor, Osborne Grant Clark, Julien Jean Malard-Adam
{"title":"Assessment of permaculture integration into gray and mainstream scientific literature in four languages. A review","authors":"Roberto Carlos Forte Taylor,&nbsp;Osborne Grant Clark,&nbsp;Julien Jean Malard-Adam","doi":"10.1007/s13593-025-01017-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Permaculture, often described as a grassroots movement, philosophy, or set of progressive agricultural practices, is considered to have significant potential to revitalize degraded land, improve the robustness of ecosystems, reduce energy consumption, and lower operating costs while effectively sequestering carbon. Despite its growing international popularity and practical benefits, the term <i>permaculture</i> remains notably isolated from mainstream scientific discourse, limiting its broader integration and impact. Literature reviews on this versatile set of agricultural practices are uncommon, and this isolation from established scientific literature significantly hampers the potential of permaculture to influence and transform contemporary agricultural systems toward enhanced sustainability. Addressing this gap, this study compiles the most comprehensive collection of white and gray literature related to permaculture to date, analyzing 975 publications across four languages—English, Portuguese, Spanish, and French—through bibliometric analysis, qualitative content analysis, H-index, and citation counts. The findings reveal that permaculture retains a dynamic presence within academic discussions, being increasingly associated with critical concepts such as design, agriculture, and ecology. Notably, the use of <i>permaculture</i> in peer-reviewed technical publications has surged, particularly in recent study periods, marking a significant shift towards recognizing its value in mainstream scientific literature. This review aims to:</p><ol>\n <li>\n <span>1.</span>\n \n <p>Gather white and gray literature related to the term <i>permaculture</i> across four languages.</p>\n \n </li>\n <li>\n <span>2.</span>\n \n <p>Identify terms most commonly associated with permaculture using computational tools.</p>\n \n </li>\n <li>\n <span>3.</span>\n \n <p>Describe the evolution of the term <i>permaculture</i> over time.</p>\n \n </li>\n <li>\n <span>4.</span>\n \n <p>Examine whether the term <i>permaculture</i> is predominantly associated with philosophical or scientific perspectives in peer-reviewed literature.</p>\n \n </li>\n <li>\n <span>5.</span>\n \n <p>Assess the increasing recognition of permaculture as a topic of interest in English peer-reviewed literature.</p>\n \n </li>\n </ol></div>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":"45 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13593-025-01017-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13593-025-01017-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Permaculture, often described as a grassroots movement, philosophy, or set of progressive agricultural practices, is considered to have significant potential to revitalize degraded land, improve the robustness of ecosystems, reduce energy consumption, and lower operating costs while effectively sequestering carbon. Despite its growing international popularity and practical benefits, the term permaculture remains notably isolated from mainstream scientific discourse, limiting its broader integration and impact. Literature reviews on this versatile set of agricultural practices are uncommon, and this isolation from established scientific literature significantly hampers the potential of permaculture to influence and transform contemporary agricultural systems toward enhanced sustainability. Addressing this gap, this study compiles the most comprehensive collection of white and gray literature related to permaculture to date, analyzing 975 publications across four languages—English, Portuguese, Spanish, and French—through bibliometric analysis, qualitative content analysis, H-index, and citation counts. The findings reveal that permaculture retains a dynamic presence within academic discussions, being increasingly associated with critical concepts such as design, agriculture, and ecology. Notably, the use of permaculture in peer-reviewed technical publications has surged, particularly in recent study periods, marking a significant shift towards recognizing its value in mainstream scientific literature. This review aims to:

  1. 1.

    Gather white and gray literature related to the term permaculture across four languages.

  2. 2.

    Identify terms most commonly associated with permaculture using computational tools.

  3. 3.

    Describe the evolution of the term permaculture over time.

  4. 4.

    Examine whether the term permaculture is predominantly associated with philosophical or scientific perspectives in peer-reviewed literature.

  5. 5.

    Assess the increasing recognition of permaculture as a topic of interest in English peer-reviewed literature.

永续农业融入灰色和主流科学文献的评估。回顾
永续农业,通常被描述为一种草根运动、哲学或一套进步的农业实践,被认为具有振兴退化土地、提高生态系统稳健性、减少能源消耗和降低运营成本的巨大潜力,同时有效地隔离碳。尽管永续农业在国际上越来越受欢迎,并带来了实际的好处,但它仍然明显孤立于主流科学话语之外,限制了它更广泛的整合和影响。关于这种多用途的农业实践的文献综述并不多见,这种与已建立的科学文献的隔离极大地阻碍了永久农业影响和转变当代农业系统的潜力,使其朝着增强可持续性的方向发展。为了弥补这一差距,本研究汇编了迄今为止与永续农业相关的最全面的白色和灰色文献,通过文献计量分析、定性内容分析、h指数和引用计数,分析了英语、葡萄牙语、西班牙语和法语四种语言的975种出版物。研究结果表明,永久农业在学术讨论中保持着活跃的存在,越来越多地与设计、农业和生态等关键概念联系在一起。值得注意的是,在同行评审的技术出版物中,特别是在最近的研究期间,永续农业的使用激增,标志着主流科学文献中认识到其价值的重大转变。本综述旨在:1。收集四种语言中与“永续农业”一词相关的白色和灰色文献。2. 使用计算工具确定与永续栽培最常相关的术语。3. 请描述“永续农业”一词随时间的演变。4. 考察在同行评议的文献中,“永续文化”一词是否主要与哲学或科学观点联系在一起。5. 评估永续农业在英国同行评议文献中越来越受重视的话题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信