{"title":"Geo-effectiveness of ICMES/MCs of different magnetic-polarity configurations","authors":"W. Alotaibi, B. Badruddin, M. Derouich","doi":"10.1007/s10509-025-04487-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This research investigates the geoeffectiveness of interplanetary magnetic field configurations by analyzing 203 geomagnetic storm events recorded between 1995 and 2015. The study systematically categorizes events into five intensity levels: quiet, weak, moderate, intense, and severe, to evaluate how different polarity configurations and flux rope configurations influence geomagnetic activity. Utilizing an extensive methodology, we employed correlation analysis and superposed epoch analysis on 17 parameters extracted from OMNI/NASA hourly datasets. The investigation focused on identifying how specific magnetic configurations impact geomagnetic storm characteristics, with special attention to the Disturbance Storm-Time Index (Dst). The findings reveal nuanced variations in geoeffectiveness across magnetic configurations. Configurations were stratified into two primary groups, with Group 1 (S, SN, SNN, SNS) demonstrating notably higher geomagnetic responsiveness. Notably, the SNS configuration emerged as the most geoeffective, accounting for 37% of intense storms and exhibiting an extended main phase lasting 48 hours. Conversely, Group 2 configurations (N, NS, NSS, NSN) generally displayed reduced geoeffectiveness, contributing to 30% of quiet storms and merely 3% of severe storms. However, the NSS configuration presented an intriguing anomaly, characterized by the lowest negative Dst value and an unprecedented 96-hour recovery phase, attributed to its distinctive two-step main phase storm. Flux rope configurations also demonstrated differential impacts, with the <span>\\(F^{+}\\)</span> rotation being particularly geoeffective, contributing to 11% of severe storms. We further uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between the dawn-dusk electric field (Ey) and <span>\\(Dst_{min}\\)</span> in the NSS configuration, registering a correlation coefficient of -0.95.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8644,"journal":{"name":"Astrophysics and Space Science","volume":"370 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astrophysics and Space Science","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10509-025-04487-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research investigates the geoeffectiveness of interplanetary magnetic field configurations by analyzing 203 geomagnetic storm events recorded between 1995 and 2015. The study systematically categorizes events into five intensity levels: quiet, weak, moderate, intense, and severe, to evaluate how different polarity configurations and flux rope configurations influence geomagnetic activity. Utilizing an extensive methodology, we employed correlation analysis and superposed epoch analysis on 17 parameters extracted from OMNI/NASA hourly datasets. The investigation focused on identifying how specific magnetic configurations impact geomagnetic storm characteristics, with special attention to the Disturbance Storm-Time Index (Dst). The findings reveal nuanced variations in geoeffectiveness across magnetic configurations. Configurations were stratified into two primary groups, with Group 1 (S, SN, SNN, SNS) demonstrating notably higher geomagnetic responsiveness. Notably, the SNS configuration emerged as the most geoeffective, accounting for 37% of intense storms and exhibiting an extended main phase lasting 48 hours. Conversely, Group 2 configurations (N, NS, NSS, NSN) generally displayed reduced geoeffectiveness, contributing to 30% of quiet storms and merely 3% of severe storms. However, the NSS configuration presented an intriguing anomaly, characterized by the lowest negative Dst value and an unprecedented 96-hour recovery phase, attributed to its distinctive two-step main phase storm. Flux rope configurations also demonstrated differential impacts, with the \(F^{+}\) rotation being particularly geoeffective, contributing to 11% of severe storms. We further uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between the dawn-dusk electric field (Ey) and \(Dst_{min}\) in the NSS configuration, registering a correlation coefficient of -0.95.
本研究通过分析1995年至2015年记录的203次地磁风暴事件,探讨了行星际磁场配置的地球有效性。该研究系统地将事件分为五个强度级别:安静、弱、中等、强烈和严重,以评估不同的极性配置和通量绳配置如何影响地磁活动。利用广泛的方法,我们对从OMNI/NASA每小时数据集中提取的17个参数进行了相关分析和叠加历元分析。调查的重点是确定特定的磁结构如何影响地磁风暴特征,特别关注扰动风暴时间指数(Dst)。这些发现揭示了不同磁结构的地球有效性的细微变化。地层结构主要分为两组,第1组(S、SN、SNN、SNS)地磁响应性明显较高。值得注意的是,SNS配置是最有效的,占37%% of intense storms and exhibiting an extended main phase lasting 48 hours. Conversely, Group 2 configurations (N, NS, NSS, NSN) generally displayed reduced geoeffectiveness, contributing to 30% of quiet storms and merely 3% of severe storms. However, the NSS configuration presented an intriguing anomaly, characterized by the lowest negative Dst value and an unprecedented 96-hour recovery phase, attributed to its distinctive two-step main phase storm. Flux rope configurations also demonstrated differential impacts, with the \(F^{+}\) rotation being particularly geoeffective, contributing to 11% of severe storms. We further uncovered a remarkably strong correlation between the dawn-dusk electric field (Ey) and \(Dst_{min}\) in the NSS configuration, registering a correlation coefficient of -0.95.
期刊介绍:
Astrophysics and Space Science publishes original contributions and invited reviews covering the entire range of astronomy, astrophysics, astrophysical cosmology, planetary and space science and the astrophysical aspects of astrobiology. This includes both observational and theoretical research, the techniques of astronomical instrumentation and data analysis and astronomical space instrumentation. We particularly welcome papers in the general fields of high-energy astrophysics, astrophysical and astrochemical studies of the interstellar medium including star formation, planetary astrophysics, the formation and evolution of galaxies and the evolution of large scale structure in the Universe. Papers in mathematical physics or in general relativity which do not establish clear astrophysical applications will no longer be considered.
The journal also publishes topically selected special issues in research fields of particular scientific interest. These consist of both invited reviews and original research papers. Conference proceedings will not be considered. All papers published in the journal are subject to thorough and strict peer-reviewing.
Astrophysics and Space Science features short publication times after acceptance and colour printing free of charge.