Experimental secondary reference odour mass (SROM) measurement for selected four odorants

IF 6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Elisa Polvara, Giacomo Domenico Scolieri, Marzio Invernizzi, Selena Sironi
{"title":"Experimental secondary reference odour mass (SROM) measurement for selected four odorants","authors":"Elisa Polvara,&nbsp;Giacomo Domenico Scolieri,&nbsp;Marzio Invernizzi,&nbsp;Selena Sironi","doi":"10.1186/s12302-025-01179-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The selection of panellists in dynamic olfactometry traditionally relies on their sensitivity to n-Butanol. The introduction of <i>secondary reference odour mass</i> (SROM), as proposed in the updated standard EN 13725:2022, offers a potential improvement in the selection process and, consequently, in odour quantification accuracy. This study was conducted at the Laboratorio Olfattometrico of Politecnico di Milano, using the new standardized procedure outlined in EN 13725:2022. This study measured and calculated the SROM values for four odorants (dimethyl sulphide, toluene, methanethiol and acetaldehyde), comparing the results with odour thresholds available in the literature.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The research’s findings show that sulphur-containing compounds, such as dimethyl sulphide and methanethiol, have lower SROM values, respectively 0.0015 and 0.000066 µmol/mol, indicating higher odour potency compared to the other tested substances (SROM<sub>toluene</sub> = 0.77 µmol/mol and SROM<sub>acetaldehyde</sub> = 0.024 µmol/mol). Focusing on the examiners' response, a slight correlation between their response to investigated odorants and n-Butanol is found. In addition, the response of examiners to odorants is generally found to be less variable compared to their response to n-Butanol under the test conditions. A different trend emerges when comparing the panellists' responses to n-Butanol and acetaldehyde: the variability between individual responses is higher for acetaldehyde, and there is a slight negative correlation between the responses to the two substances.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study provides specific SROM values and experimental evidence supporting the integration of odorant-specific reference materials into panel selection procedures, with the aim of enhancing the reliability of dynamic olfactometry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":546,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-025-01179-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-025-01179-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The selection of panellists in dynamic olfactometry traditionally relies on their sensitivity to n-Butanol. The introduction of secondary reference odour mass (SROM), as proposed in the updated standard EN 13725:2022, offers a potential improvement in the selection process and, consequently, in odour quantification accuracy. This study was conducted at the Laboratorio Olfattometrico of Politecnico di Milano, using the new standardized procedure outlined in EN 13725:2022. This study measured and calculated the SROM values for four odorants (dimethyl sulphide, toluene, methanethiol and acetaldehyde), comparing the results with odour thresholds available in the literature.

Results

The research’s findings show that sulphur-containing compounds, such as dimethyl sulphide and methanethiol, have lower SROM values, respectively 0.0015 and 0.000066 µmol/mol, indicating higher odour potency compared to the other tested substances (SROMtoluene = 0.77 µmol/mol and SROMacetaldehyde = 0.024 µmol/mol). Focusing on the examiners' response, a slight correlation between their response to investigated odorants and n-Butanol is found. In addition, the response of examiners to odorants is generally found to be less variable compared to their response to n-Butanol under the test conditions. A different trend emerges when comparing the panellists' responses to n-Butanol and acetaldehyde: the variability between individual responses is higher for acetaldehyde, and there is a slight negative correlation between the responses to the two substances.

Conclusions

This study provides specific SROM values and experimental evidence supporting the integration of odorant-specific reference materials into panel selection procedures, with the aim of enhancing the reliability of dynamic olfactometry.

选取四种气味剂进行二次参考气味质量(SROM)的实验测量
在动态嗅觉测定中,小组成员的选择传统上依赖于他们对正丁醇的敏感性。更新后的标准EN 13725:2022中提出的二次参考气味质量(rom)的引入,为选择过程提供了潜在的改进,从而提高了气味量化的准确性。这项研究是在米兰理工大学Olfattometrico实验室进行的,使用了EN 13725:2022中概述的新标准化程序。本研究测量并计算了四种气味剂(二甲基硫化物、甲苯、甲硫醇和乙醛)的rom值,并将结果与文献中可用的气味阈值进行了比较。结果研究结果表明,含硫化合物,如二甲基硫化物和甲硫醇,具有较低的rom值,分别为0.0015和0.000066 μ mol/mol,表明与其他测试物质(srom甲苯= 0.77 μ mol/mol和SROMacetaldehyde = 0.024 μ mol/mol)相比,气味效能更高。关注审查员的反应,发现他们对所研究的气味和正丁醇的反应之间存在轻微的相关性。此外,在测试条件下,审查员对气味剂的反应通常比他们对正丁醇的反应变化更小。当比较小组成员对正丁醇和乙醛的反应时,出现了不同的趋势:乙醛的个体反应之间的可变性更高,对这两种物质的反应之间存在轻微的负相关。结论本研究提供了特定的rom值和实验证据,支持将特定气味参考物质纳入面板选择程序,旨在提高动态嗅觉测定的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Sciences Europe
Environmental Sciences Europe Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation. ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation. ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation. Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues. Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信